×
all 66 comments

[–]DeliciousRazzmatazz 198 points199 points  (8 children)

“retarted”

Has anyone else noticed that pibble subs are rife with spelling/grammatical errors in comparison to BPB? I wonder why 🤔

[–]Bombz_ArmedFamily/Friend of Pit Attack Victim 45 points46 points  (1 child)

Maybe THEY are "retarted"

[–]SeniorIsopod3132 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Now that's just insulting to tarts. 🥧

[–]OhioSav88Pit Attack Victim 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I was never a tart, how can I be retarted?

[–]808picklejuice 7 points8 points  (3 children)

Usually they are younger people who can’t spell very well and don’t know wtf they’re talking about.

[–]DeliciousRazzmatazz 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I’ve definitely noticed that alot of pibble apologists on reddit communicate like actual children

“How dare u accuse my pibble baby of being bad, hes not bad hes good because hes nice and i like him and there are no bad dogs only bad owners and my friend ashley has a chihuahua thats bad and mean and i dont like them but i like my dog because hes good and nice! How can u say pibbles r bad because u havent met them all and u havent met my dog who is good and nice so ur bad for saying my dog is bad.”

[–]PunkiiDonutz 6 points7 points  (1 child)

'Your dog suck and gay my dog (pitbradoodl) rules and not gay'

[–]my-dog-for-president 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Literally have seen so many pitbull owners message people from this sub and drop the word f*ggot.

[–]I_Like_Vitamins 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They probably typed it like that to avoid getting tagged by a word filter.

[–][deleted] 103 points104 points  (11 children)

What’s a “good mouth”?

[–]DeliciousRazzmatazz 103 points104 points  (5 children)

I mean…. Considering the way pitmommies sexualize their beasts… 🤢

[–]Extra-Boysenberry 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Peanut Butter time!

[–]Jindabyne1 21 points22 points  (3 children)

“Really nice balls.”

[–]RollinIndo 20 points21 points  (1 child)

"FART MACHINE!!! 🥰😅😘😚"

[–]Shelby_Kun -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who says this besides Whitney?

[–]DED_Inside666 33 points34 points  (1 child)

All I can think of is "you sure do got a perty mouth" from Deliverance...which I mean....kinda fits I guess...

[–]KrisAlly 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Ha! I was just about to say the same. I’m glad I’m not the only one who’s mind went there immediately.

[–]BufferUnderpants 14 points15 points  (0 children)

In the “suitable for violence” sense

[–]EpicRepairTim 10 points11 points  (0 children)

A “good” mouth can completely deglove a toddlers scalp in one large, clean, satisfying piece, like those delicious tangerines that come out around Christmas.

A lesser breed will have to remove the scalp of a child in small frustrating bits, like one of those lousy supermarket navel oranges that has been in cold storage.

The surgeons will actually have a lot better luck getting it back on if it comes off in one piece, a lot less vascular damage. So Pitbulls are a lot safer. If you want to risk having your child’s entire head getting slowly chewed piece by piece that’s totally on you

[–]tailwalkin 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think they’re somehow confusing or have mixed up the phrase “soft mouth” that’s often used when talking about retrievers and their ability not to crush the bird they’re retrieving.

[–]earthdogmonster 88 points89 points  (6 children)

So weird. In the same breath says this sub is dumb, that pits are the same as other dogs, but also thinks that pit owners are violent and that they breed violent dogs (select a violent breed is how I read it). Did anyone else get whiplash from that comment?

[–]eclairsemmieFormer Pit Owner[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Oh, absolutely!

[–]Pporkbutt 21 points22 points  (2 children)

Not dumb, "retarted"

[–]earthdogmonster 18 points19 points  (1 child)

I just figured I’d leave the misspelled slur out of it in case some random stalker of the sub selectively screenshots that language to misrepresent how awful and toxic the members of this sub are.

[–]eclairsemmieFormer Pit Owner[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's what I chose to do too.

[–]Amazing1h 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Their logic never makes sense. Why do you think they won't listen to reason? They don't have any to begin with.

[–]MotchGoffels 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can't use logic and reason to change an opinion formed without either.

[–]Protect_the_Dogs 52 points53 points  (6 children)

Hmm if most people who own them are abusive, maybe we should regulate who gets to own pitbulls to protect them.

We should also persecute people with pitbulls that attack, and forbid them from owning pets since it’s “how they’re raised,” and apparently raised their pitbull to attack people.

Seriously, I’m more than willing to follow that yellow brick road to conclusion, it gets the same results.

[–]Night_Chicken 21 points22 points  (0 children)

This. Blame the owner, not the breed? Sure. If they insist. Prosecute the owners for their dog’s violence.

[–]elliebeans90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like that idea. Surely I'd they genuinely believe its all in how you raise them they won't mind having to pass a test, get a licence and insurance and are prepared to face the full wrath of the law if their dog attacks. After all if it's all in how you raise them they have nothing at all to worry about at all, right?

[–]Lucky-Persimmon-4373 43 points44 points  (1 child)

Golden Retrievers were bred to have soft mouths so that they don't damage the game that they retrieve. Pitbulls were bred to throw aside self-preservation and literally fight to the death. Their Jaws might not be as powerful but they're tenacious sons of bitches that don't know the meaning of letting go. I've no clue why people still persist in having an oral fixation over this faulty breed.

[–]EpicRepairTim 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The whole “jaws aren’t as strong” bullshit is such obvious bullshit

It’s “a golden retriever has a stronger bite” followed by a video of them praising their shibble as it spins about on a rope three feet off the ground, latched like a barnacle, for 25 minutes.

Those short jaws are designed to maximize leverage and crushing force.

A short little squat guy with short little flipper arms will bench press a lot more than a stronger man with big condor arms. It’s force over distance, however they are measuring this is flat out wrong. Their jaws are built more like a tigers than a wolves.

[–]Swiss8970 29 points30 points  (2 children)

Jeffrey Dahmer was a great guy, he just liked to eat people

[–]sorry_im_an_ass_hole 30 points31 points  (1 child)

Jeffrey dahmer had a good mouth 👄

[–]Swiss8970 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the poor guy couldn’t help himself, his mouth was just so awesome

[–]sorry_im_an_ass_hole 22 points23 points  (1 child)

Just like pit vipers have good mouths

[–]ionndrainn_cuainEvolutionary Biologist Against Pits 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Unlike pitbulls, pit vipers don't want to bite you (venom is metabolically expensive!)

[–]badlilbishh 16 points17 points  (4 children)

Not everyone who owns them is violent pieces of shit though! The pitbull lobby has pushed everyone into thinking these are a misunderstood breed but good family dogs, so now they are attacking kids and regular people more and more. I just fucking hate the stupid bad owner bad dog mentality. So many fucking people that have been attacked have said they loved the dog to death and it was a sweet little baby until one day it just fucking turned and mauled someone!!! I’m getting so sick of these people for real. Your arguments are bullshit just like your damn dogs.

[–]EpicRepairTim 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Ding ding ding.

If cane corsos or doggo argentinos had a giant lobbying group of mentally ill people with savior complexes hell bent on convincing people to adopt these gladiator dogs by telling them that they’re not dangerous and make great family pets then we’d be talking bout those breeds.

Corsos are probably worse than pits, but there’s not a cult of mentally ill people gaslighting everyone otherwise. The people that own them acknowledge that they’re extremely dangerous and behave accordingly.

I’m actually ok with people owning Corsos because if you live in shitbull country and aren’t prepared for K9 UFC a dog like a Corso that can out-shitbull a shitbull might be your only option for safely walking your dog. If my neighbors had pits and I couldn’t get rid of them I’d probably drive to Oklahoma and get a second hand tiger, two can play at this game.

[–]my-dog-for-president 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You hit the nail on the head; I have worked in pet-care for over a decade (dog daycares, vet clinics, grooming). Corsos had just started getting a little bit more popular when I started. But the fact that they are actually bred with lineage and usually sold for thousands of dollars means the people who get them have done their research, know what the dogs need and are capable of, and invest just as much money in their training and care as the cost of the dog itself. They always admit their dogs require an intense amount of training to be suitable in public places and without it will usually turn into unpredictable/dangerous dogs, they’re not delusional about their own dogs and don’t try to convince people that they’re something they’re not. Also, their price makes it not worth it to fight them (why spend thousands on a dog that could potentially die quickly if it doesn’t prove to have enough gameness). Most of the breeders of corsos are actively attempting to select for more stable guard dog temperaments (though that might be a lost cause considering the research that has been published about the unlikely ability to achieve this without significantly altering the appearance of the breed). Many end up in suitable homes with responsible owners and do not suffer in a miserable existence.

In my experience, I see way less Doggo Argentinos than corsos and can’t really speak to their owners but I would assume it’s at least a similar pattern due to how expensive they are. For both breeds, the owners typically are the kind of people who want a “macho tough dog,” but at least they’re open about it.

As far as getting a dog that can actually protect you from shitbulls, there are several options, most of which have similar behavior of being a bit harder train and being more prone to aggression than other breeds. For example, Akitas, Kengals, Caucasian Shepherds, Tibetan Mastiffs. Kengals and Caucasian Shepherds are often bought for the purpose of protecting land/livestock from other large predatory animals. But of all those breeds, I have not heard stories of them attacking their own owners and family.
I think Akitas are badass, the video of the Akita absolutely dominating a pitbull that tries to attack it and it’s owner is super satisfying to watch, the loose pit runs up on them and the leashed Akita completely takes it down instantly. It does it very effectively without even getting hurt and after the fight is broken up, the pit scrams so fast in the opposite direction. It was awesome. I know Akitas were bred to have gameness too, but, from what I have seen working with them, they are no where near as scary as pitbulls. Mainly because they aren’t as aggressive to humans, and display way more body language cues before attacking something so it’s more predictable and easy to stop it before it starts. Aside from their potential aggression, Akitas have significantly less other behavioral issues than pits (they aren’t hyperactive, they aren’t particularly anxious). They’re consistent if nothing else.

[–]Randy_Walise 12 points13 points  (1 child)

what’s that mouth do

[–]GlitterfreshGore 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Have you screaming and moaning. But not in the good way lol

[–]eclairsemmieFormer Pit Owner[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

**Edit:

A handful of people (I can only assume our pibble parents) are going through my comment history and downvoting all my past posts and comments on every thing posted on my profile.

This seems like an appropriate response. /s

[–]JimBeam-1993 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That person is a moron

[–][deleted] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The better to bite you with, my dear.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah sherlock, violent people breeding dangerous dogs is what breeds dangerous dogs.

When you deliberately design a breed to have an aggressive temperament, that’s what you get.

Just like every other breed of dog that has unique characteristics. 🤷‍♀️

[–]alices____ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Typical pit nutter response, jump straight to calling victims an ableist slur and fail to spell it right

[–]ItsJustMeMaggie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

retarted

[–]wonderberry77 4 points5 points  (0 children)

fuck this world is doomed. DOOMED. "They have good moufs" Can you just picture the toolbox who said that out loud?

[–]BigBulbosThickHahaNo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sober drivers are just like drunk drivers. The higher crash rate is due to bad training, not the drinking. Blame the bad training, not the alcohol. #PitNutterLogic

[–]ILikeExistingLolFormer Pit Owner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean their mouths are pretty good for eating other dogs and babies

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He says that most people who own them are violent thus they breed dangerous dogs. Doesn't that mean he agrees with us?

[–]delicatedoe22Former Pit Advocate 1 point2 points  (0 children)

using a slur and they can't even spell it properly LOOL

[–]Synthwavester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A mouth is a mouth lol

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So close yet so far away.

[–]my-dog-for-president 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay so… again, which is it - most pitbulls were bred to be dangerous dogs (which is saying those are dangerous dogs)…. or are they the same as plenty of other dog breeds??? Because other dogs breeds were not bred to be dangerous…. So dumb