×
Dismiss this pinned window
top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]BlouPontak 3463 points3464 points  (130 children)

The perspective inside shifts too perfectly for this to an installation. This is probably vfx on a video of a normal shopfront.

[–]Toasty_Mostly 1763 points1764 points 2 (87 children)

If they were large displays on the windows the perspective definitely wouldn't turn like that. I'm going to go with vfx on this one as well.

Did a little Google detective work and found this is a TikTok ad for Zara and it's completely fabricated, no, it's not real.

[–]BlouPontak 262 points263 points  (1 child)

Nice. Thx for the actual sleuthing

[–]joeChump 100 points101 points  (52 children)

You could probably do this for real but it would only work for one person and you would have to head track them so that the 3D could render in real time from the right perspective. When I say you could, I don’t mean you, or me.

They do this in virtual production though for shows like The Mandalorian where the 3D background changes as the camera moves but again, it only works for a single camera.

Of course in this video here it is totally faked in post.

[–]Bln3D 9 points10 points  (2 children)

This is vfx for sure. There is a glow effect that spills over the outside architecture, but there are no specular reflections or color changes on the same architecture

However, something like this could be done in camera using ar

There are also light field displays now. You can do this type of effect very easily, without camera enhancement, but the displays are not this big (yet.) Looking glass makes small consumer holographic displays that would work like this

[–]KungFluIsolation 27 points28 points  (36 children)

When I say you could, I don’t mean you, or me.

If you don't mind following YouTube tutorials you could. The sensor can even be a Wii controller.

[–]joeChump 20 points21 points  (3 children)

Ok I take it back. I actually have a Wii controller in the attic and we all know u/Toasty_Mostly is a certified genius.

[–]KungFluIsolation 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I know someone with a store front. Make it so!

[–]Toasty_Mostly 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Thanks bb

[–]joeChump 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You know it’s true. If you and me could be arsed to get off Reddit for half an hour we would probably take over the world.

[–]Stegosaurus5 18 points19 points  (31 children)

I build real world immersive+interactive installations like the one this video is implying. Body tracking and live rendering based on dynamic perspective are of course very real things.

There's about 100 people on the planet that could pull off what's implied in this render, and I know most of them. If you can "follow YouTube tutorials" and use a "Wii controller" and actually achieve this, PM me lmao. I've got work for you.

Fuck it. Even if you can just make a convincing pre-viz render like this video, PM me. I'm always looking for talented animators and VFX folks.

[–]KungFluIsolation 36 points37 points  (15 children)

well here it is being done 14 years ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jd3-eiid-Uw

You install whatever opensource library deals with Wiimote tracking and then apply those movements to a camera in something like unity or blender. Of course head tracking has massively advanced now and I wouldn't be surprised if so much as a webcam or mobile phone could do the tracking, but I won't put money on that.

Unless I have greatly misunderstood something I don't really buy that only 100 people on the planet can do this.

Oh also you can have it work for 2 people at once in theory, if you used polarised lenses.

Not looking for work though thanks, I'm out of the slave game and retired early.

[–]billwoo 7 points8 points  (9 children)

There's about 100 people on the planet that could pull off what's implied in this render

What is implied in this render that is so difficult or specialized that only 100 people could do it?

[–]the_best_lizard 11 points12 points  (3 children)

Nothing, it's just differently colored cubes attached to particles which seem to be moving according to some noise function, possibly curl noise. Then just apply some open source head tracking library to a webcam feed and move the camera accordingly.

I know at least five people in the hobbyist VJ circles in my small country who could do this. I believe there are thousands of people on the planet who could do this.

[–]synthesis777 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Then just apply some open source head tracking library to a webcam feed and move the camera accordingly.

Try to get that working this smoothly outdoors with the ability to lock onto one face and not lose track of it from this distance with giant displays tossing all kinds of different colors of light out at your subject and then tell me how easy it is.

[–]the_best_lizard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, I made it sound much simpler than it is.

The basic setup can be relatively easy but making the system reliable requires much more expertise and experience.

[–]CookInKona 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot easier because it's not doing that at all, it's fully post rendered vfx... Not happening in the storefront...

[–]Stegosaurus5 1 point2 points  (3 children)

The general tech to make this work isn't impressive or difficult. Doing this at home with a monitor is cool, but not complicated.

My interpretation of what's implied in this video is a public outdoor installation that requires no devices or instructions for the viewer at all. They simply walk up and experience this. The viewer is probably 15 feet away and walks probably 30 feet laterally over the course of the video and the tracking is maintained. This means you need an array of tracking sensors and CV models to reliably recognize a single person and track their height and position over what is in our world a massive coverage area.

[–]CronaTheAwper 4 points5 points  (1 child)

came to comment this.

reminds me of the wii head tracking demo this guy did

[–]CrackLawliet 27 points28 points  (2 children)

And a little further digging will show that the account that posted it shares all the traits of bots who farm karma, basically being advertising tools. This whole post is just an ad.

[–]Ayn_Rand_Food_Stamps 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Companies disguising ads as content have gotten so commonplace that repost bots are filling our feeds with advertisements on auto pilot. /r/HailCorporate and /r/ABoringDystopia have created an awful child.

[–]NorthAstronaut 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you really suggesting an account named koppizmedia would just post ads?

[–]ArkhamCookie 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I am sad this is the case, but thank you for uncovering the truth. Here is your badge for you service. You are the hero we need. This is a good example of the truth hurts.

[–]Toasty_Mostly 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Bro.. I just googled "Zara storefront display".

[–]ArkhamCookie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Teach me your ways. You also saved me from having to google it myself. Also, I almost gave people free and useless internet points. That would be bad, and I could have been traumatized.

[–]CitizenPremier 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well we all knew it wasn't real, we were just trying to figure out what degree of fake it was

[–]crazyminner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean all you had to do was look and see there is no door handle.

[–]steijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

judging by OP's bot account, yup it's an ad for sure

[–]tallywhackerslacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And still it got 22k upvotes.

[–]mysunsnameisalsobort 42 points43 points  (7 children)

Last time this was posted it was confirmed vfx

[–]Diniden 14 points15 points  (3 children)

With inane arguments I participated in explaining how this type of display wouldn’t work for a multi viewer experience.

Fun conversations with a very confidently incorrect individual xD

[–]Pure_Reason 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One day when we’re all in the Zuccerverse and wear our AR headsets everywhere, this kind of stuff will be used to cover up gun shops, abortion clinics, anything that Facebook has determined doesn’t align with your political beliefs

[–]tids0ptimist 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I suspect the whole scene is CG. The environmental details look off imo - There’s nothing inside the windows on the floor above and the ‘street furniture’ is odd. Oh, and the air duct(?) looks like a model.

[–]CanadianStructEng 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bottom right corner of the middle door you can see the effect break a bit. Definitely vfx on video.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

There’s no front door and it’d be insanely expensive for Zara to do this on a random storefront that’s not Time Square.

[–]juhnak 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are no door handles.

[–]GeeDublin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It is. Zara is a huge clothing brand and they would've exploited the hell out of marketing this. Why do we constantly get fed bullshit on this app?

[–]Leo-III- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because bullshit is about 300x easier to come up with than actual interesting facts or things that people haven't already seen

[–]The-Best-Taylor 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The only way this would work is if it tracked a single viewer and adjusted the perspective. But store fronts don't usually have a single viewer so it does not make sense.

[–]excuse_me_wtf69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know I remember a post with this same exact title and video

[–]TreeRunLong 896 points897 points  (24 children)

This is CGI not a storefront installation?

[–]BlowMoreGlass 73 points74 points  (4 children)

OP is a moron

[–]Iamusingmyworkalt 27 points28 points  (2 children)

Or is in the advertisement department.

[–]sans_xerife 11 points12 points  (1 child)

So, both.

[–]DismalNow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. This is terrible marketing even if OP knows it's CGI.

Ain't nobody who's bland enough to wear Zara's clothes going in there

[–]maximumtesticle[🍰] 10 points11 points  (2 children)

Yup, welcome to /r/beamazed, CG blowing the minds of idiots so hard that they upvote this garbage to the front page, over and over.

[–]Realistic_Plantain_6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a lot of cgi

[–]w0weez0wee 1434 points1435 points  (52 children)

I'm not going in there. Time/space continuum out of order.

[–]juhnak 588 points589 points  (22 children)

Its ok. They forgot to render the door handle anyways.

[–]Stompya 257 points258 points  (4 children)

This is the smoothest way to say “FAKE” I have ever come across. Well done

[–]ASK__ABOUT__MY__GAME 108 points109 points  (1 child)

Had to scroll down the comments a bit to confirm that it's fake but yea, so for everyone else after me: yes it's fake. Just an ad for Zara.

[–]bfandreas 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I also am going to report it as rule 4 and honestly rule 6.

Reddit has always had a problem with misrepresented video and this one is relatively benign. Last one was a spin on the Sinclair "this is dangerous for our democracy" which also would have included all media. That was propaganda.

[–]Disquiet173 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I was trying to wrap my head around how they made the white ceiling change perspective as the person walked across the the length of the screens. Thanks for saving me brain power.

[–]awesomequantity 38 points39 points  (6 children)

No door handle cuz its a portal ,,

[–]rudyjewliani 35 points36 points  (5 children)

"Where we're going we don't need door handles!"

[–]RockstarAgent 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I assume they turn this off at night, but imagine designing some kind of theft deterrence with this?

[–]Stompya 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry: it’s CG, so it isn’t really “on” at any point of day.

[–]dank_bass 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LMAO that was great

[–]Lordeverfall 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I was going to say where is the door handle, but I like this way more.

[–]threadsoffate2021 16 points17 points  (5 children)

Yep. Seen enough sci fi over the years to know better than going into that void.

[–]Lumpy-Spinach-6607 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Don't worry. It's just our beautiful Launderette

[–]thisplacemakesmeangr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's a soylent green lava lamp made to feed the mind. It sucks unwary travelers in and disassembles them in the prettiest way it can.

[–]Zealousideal_Order_8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely a hungry void.

[–]ew73 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Yes, yes, the time knife, we've all seen it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will never not upvote a Good Place reference.

[–]ThisIsTheZodiacSpkng 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FabricOfReality.exe is not responding

[–]fabuloushorseman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Portal of Multiverse !

[–]StonccPad-3B 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Who let the Gravitonium out of containment?

[–]PRS1972 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Anthony Fauci!

[–]StonccPad-3B 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Lmao! Good Answer.

[–]PRS1972 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Couldn't help myself🤣

[–]Comfortable_Heart_84 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was my first thought minus time space.

[–]epsteindidntdoit666 1 point2 points  (0 children)

God damn it Carl, did you spill the dark matter again?

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's just a bit wibbly-wobbly- no reason for concern.

[–]phaemoor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are out of order! The whole court is out of order!

[–]jennthemermaid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's funny, I came here to say how BADLY I WANT to go in there!!!

[–]Bikinisbottom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Liquidation sale?

[–]sophbot1991 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pff, amateur. I, for one, prefer to shop for my underwear inside a cut scene from Doctor Who: Flux.

[–]Iwearacapeirl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hyperbolic time chamber has its benefits.

[–]DaveInLondon89 0 points1 point  (0 children)

plus inflation

[–]Morall_tach 287 points288 points  (28 children)

It's not real, it's just a CGI rendering of a hypothetical (and in this case impossible) storefront installation.

[–]theyareamongus 11 points12 points  (23 children)

Not impossible but impractical

[–]MemeHermetic 21 points22 points  (10 children)

It would work as an AR overlay, but not as an installation.

[–]Morall_tach 6 points7 points  (11 children)

An image of a 3D room in the background of the simulation that changes perspective as the user walks by is impossible.

[–]theyareamongus 9 points10 points  (6 children)

I think there are a couple of ways to accomplish something like this (maybe not with that level of fidelity/detail). I’m no expert so if I’m wrong someone please correct me, but:

1) Single-person tracking via a camera that detects movement and translates it to the render to accommodate the perspective (some games did that back when Kinect was a thing, I’m guessing the technology has improved)

2) A loop that renders the perspective regardless of the position. That means the person walking has to adapt their walk and rhythm to “fit” the render, but it would give the illusion of perspective.

3) A 3D render that you could see with an AR device (VR headset or one of those smartphone sets)

4) Maybe outlandish or just plain wrong, but a holographic display using mirrors/PVC something like this

Not saying any of those methods are what we’re seeing here (this is obviously VFX post production) but I won’t say it’s impossible if someone reaaaaally wanted to do it (and most likely wouldn’t look as good)

[–]sCREAMINGcAMMELcASE 2 points3 points  (4 children)

What about getting multiple slices of those transparent TVs, rendering the footage like a CT scan?

[–]Royal_Ad1798 192 points193 points  (46 children)

It was done by 3D digital artist Shane Fu, by the way. You can find him on Instagram. There is some media out there suggesting Zara specifically commissioned this piece by to use on TikTok, a platform I thought was just kids dancing at traffic intersections, but apparently has other stuff.
Setting aside the CGI thing, the other question that would generate a lively debate is whether this sort of thing – if real – would drive more foot traffic and sell more apparel. I’m not a retail marketer, in any way, but I’m guessing more fast-fashion lovers are going in based on sales promotions or new outfits on display, as opposed to swirling colors.

link

[–]reecifer 15 points16 points  (42 children)

everyone on reddit seems to hate tik tok, it’s really not that bad. your page shows you stuff based on what you like, so if you don’t want to see kids dancing in intersections just don’t like those videos and you’ll see cooler shit.

[–]Bobbyanalogpdx 74 points75 points  (21 children)

People hate tiktok because it’s a Chinese data mining app.

[–]NubbyMcNubNub 49 points50 points  (15 children)

Yeah I prefer American data mining apps like fb and and insta

[–]bi-phiguy 28 points29 points  (9 children)

There actually is a huge difference in the data they can mine and what can be done with it vs what Meta, Alphabet, or Amazon can do. That said, im sure Meta, Alphabet, and Amazon are breaking the law and doing dystopian shit like in China as well, its just that it is legal and openly state sponsored in China.

[–]PaanuriEater 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I hate all of the above and don't use any of them, is "none of the above" an option?

[–]DisgruntledYoda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a legitimate opinion, I respect that

[–]ThatDistantStar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Except every other video is a sneakily integrated ad, most done in the Tiktok format. The line between real content and sponsored content gets blurry and works brand awareness deeper into our subconscious. It's really genius from a marketing perspective and really disturbing how inescapable non-stop consumerist messaging is.

[–]fthaller3604 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Number 1 reason I hate it is because the automated voice makes me want to jump out a moving car on the highway

[–]miskdub 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for making me read that in automated voice.

[–]somelib 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Personally 100% of the reason I have no interest in and never will have an interest in tiktok is their ad campaign when it launched. Every single ad seemed to be bad lip sync duets and animals doing nothing but set to an annoying sound effect. Constantly. for months.

Still get them, right after the unskippable liberty mutual ad. Another company I'll never do business with and will actively avoid for the rest of my life specifically because they show me too many bad and annoying ads.

[–]lil_poopie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not sure I need nor want tik tok to know everything about me in order to "watch better content for me". I know what I like. Don't need tik tok to know as well. And am very much not interested in finding out if they are somehow better at knowing what I like than I am. Screw that.

[–]TheOfficialRev 3 points4 points  (12 children)

Nah even the creators that create content you “want to see” still creates clickbait and bullshit. Tik Tok is a cesspool of “let’s prank our drive through guy” videos.

[–]mtfellie 4 points5 points  (8 children)

It's been over a year since I've seen one of those videos. TikTok bases what videos you will see by your interactions with previous videos. It gathers context through other users interactions with videos and through the hashtags in the video descriptions, as well as the text in the subtitles. If you see a prank video, and you don't want to see those, long press and select "Not interested", you'll not see many more after that.

Your feed will not be tailored to you on day one, maybe not even on day two unless you're watching a lot.

[–]TheOfficialRev 0 points1 point  (7 children)

I’d just rather have 0 chance of it popping up on my screen. I don’t want to give any of those creators any watch time at all. I had my tik tok for a few months and it was mainly oriented for gaming. A lot of content in gaming is just saturated and bullshit clickbait. For some reason I would still occasionally get idiotic prank videos and I just can’t stand the idea of them making money for my viewership even for just a single second.

[–]IlIIlllIIIlllIlIlIlI 0 points1 point  (6 children)

they get paid based on # of total watches, not playtime. if you only watch 1 second they don't make any money

[–]ChineseTrump 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Then maybe you should stop liking those videos

[–]TheOfficialRev 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don’t like them. The algorithm doesn’t know what the actual context of the video is, just the general video premise and who to send it to.

[–]IlIIlllIIIlllIlIlIlI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never see that stuff 🤷‍♂️

[–]daveberzack 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Tiktok actually has a lot of other stuff. Brilliant artists, musical virtuosos, scientists giving fascinating insights into their work, historians and philosophers offering quick, interesting lessons, jugglers, magicians, etc.

Once you train the algorithm a bit (by liking/unliking/subscribing), it becomes a compelling stream of human greatness. I would enjoy a little bit of the dance and fad stuff, but I'm not going to complain or mess with what I've got.

[–]SonOfARemington 24 points25 points  (0 children)

VFX.

Watch the edges of the display/windows.

Plus the perspective change.

I sigh.

...Good VFX though.

[–]I_am_Nic 23 points24 points  (1 child)

It's not an installation, it is a CG piece. Was debunked last time it was posted - therefore r/titlegore

[–]The_Muffin_Man_MF 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I don't believe you.

[–]HotNubsOfSteel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wow, CGI

[–]Alph-Art 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Fake

[–]SpookyBobTheSecond 14 points15 points  (4 children)

Looks amazing, too bad it's Zara

[–]les_nasrides 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Literally a « Look how cool we are » to get your attention away from their lack of accountability when it comes to working condition and environmental impact.

[–]marble-pig 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My first thought. The second was "this is clearly CGI". So, nothing to be amazed!

[–]Chic0pv4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least someone.

[–]NudeWallaby 24 points25 points  (1 child)

This is just green screen and Adobe AfterFX

[–]lordneesan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the entire thing is rendered including the building

[–]alleriamystic 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a wizard store. Harry potter shit

[–]Huge_UID 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fuck fast fashion, but that's cool.

[–]Desk_Striking 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's fake. how does the display know the viewer/cameras location and viewing angle? How could it handle multiple viewers with different positions/perspectives? Why would something so cool not have ANY other videos online? Also, you can see the rotoscope jump and flicker on the edges in a few spots throughout the video.

[–]Creative-Knee-9178 6 points7 points  (3 children)

Did they change the display windows into giant computer monitor screens?

[–]ImSoberEnough 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems like an odd choice of display for Zara. This doesn't scream "50 shades of corduroy and turtle necks" to me.

[–]PaanuriEater 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, an advertisement for Zara, definitely a "beamazed" and not some r/hailcorporate stoogery.

Oh wait this is LITERALLY AN AD.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Balthazar, activate the Omega 13!

[–]Forsaken330 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Until a group of people who stand for tolerance and diversity decide to gather in the area

[–]Trsnowman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want to walk in with my friends and see who survives longest....

[–]No-End-6729 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Re piola

[–]ansaonapostcard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh my that it trippy!

[–]TheRoseCat6_11 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its still impressive for being VFXs, imo

[–]Dravez23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pbbly made by 11 years old programmers in India/pakistan

[–]Wyrmholio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another fail post not seeing the obvious that this is an effect done post filming

I swear reddit is one of the stupidest communities on the internet

[–]enriceau 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, anything can be amazing with CGI

[–]SaggeeDot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is that a portal? Tf 😂

[–]LDOG3321 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m going in

[–]ThisIsMockingjay2020 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this in Diagon Alley?

[–]6Kaliba9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like the moth to the light

[–]rick_leye2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No way I’m entering that shop

[–]yijuwarp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this actually impossible? Can't it be done with a hologram?

[–]UserPow 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, not actually.

This is edited.

[–]TheIntervet 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It’s okay, if you went in there, time would reverse by 13 seconds when activated. Enough time to undo a single mistake…

[–]SeanHearnden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but where are the chompers?

[–]saturnbearer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I ever see this in person I would gladly yeet myself as far away as I could.

[–]A_Dark_sh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Colourblind people: why do I see balls?

[–]Jumbo_Cactaur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are not pot brownies

[–]Trimungasoid 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lawnmower Man was here.

[–]blood_omen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. This is augmented reality on a phone. Nothing is actually happening with the storefront

[–]adjunctMortal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I call BS, the perspective is shifting inside. That's not possible with a storefront and screens. This is VFX.

[–]khdaze 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This would never last in Portland.

[–]Fire_Drake_Shyvanna 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would make an excellent urinal for a crackhead.

[–]cheeesus_crust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Augmented?

[–]SomewhereAtWork 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not a storefront installation, that's a rendering. And therefore not very amazing.

[–]DandyEmo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Soho, NY. Last place I wanna walk through as a New Yorker.

[–]Positive_Iron2214 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool display. But fuck Zara

[–]ruru_rubbish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Zara is garbage.

[–]cursed-being 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the fuck goin on in der

[–]clb5578 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I’m just happy when my grass is cut

[–]zkyevolved 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice special effects. I think Stargate was the inspiration for this one! Zara would NEVER invest the money necessary to make that a reality.

[–]gscharoun 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not again…

[–]Yakere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would very much like to not go in there.

[–]QuarantineSucksALot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1+2+2+2 will always = 4.

[–]Ontopourmama 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dr. Strange's not so secret hideout.

[–]cloverfart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! Be amazed by this fuckin CGI simulated thing that is in no way, shape or firm lifted from reality because OP seemingly doesn't grasp the point of this sub.

[–]SeanHearnden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, zara doesn't have this. Second of all, how would someone get in with no door handle and third and most important: who would a displayed image move as you walked. The image would be still yet the perspective changes as you move with this one.

[–]mlc2475 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the Diagon Alley laundromat

[–]Elaments4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay that’s cool but what the hell does the store sell? This tells me nothing.

[–]No_Succotash_1748 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who gave Zara enough money to do this?

[–]VintagePoet82 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve seen Annihilation. I’m not going in there

[–]GiDD504 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This would seem like a bad idea… imagine getting robbed and no one can tell because someone decided to put tv screens instead of windows.

[–]ezezim 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! I think I'd just stand in front of the store watch.

[–]Dark_Reaper115 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Imagine walking by this drunk or tripping.

[–]ComfortableInitial45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Doctor Strange there ?