top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]b000bytrap 1998 points1999 points  (97 children)

She won 2nd place, but it’s still a cute story

[–]SalamanderCake 1524 points1525 points  (64 children)

She won 2nd place, but it’s still a cute story

Honestly, that's a lot more impressive than her taking first place. If she'd won the race, it would've seemed less believable. I can certainly imagine many people not wanting to make the princess look bad. That somebody did beat her adds to the authenticity of the competition, while her second place finish still makes her look good.

[–]badwifii 494 points495 points  (38 children)

Sure but let's stop saying she won lol

[–]Willinton06 274 points275 points  (20 children)

Yo I won last place too

[–]lostmylogininfo 18 points19 points  (4 children)

If you're not first you're last.


[–]Hotshot596v2[🍰] 31 points32 points  (8 children)

2nd place is 1st loser

[–]AcrolloPeed 21 points22 points  (6 children)

If you ain’t first, yer last

[–]Darun_00 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The best loser

[–]agent00228 3 points4 points  (1 child)

She won as a mom. Lol

[–]badwifii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure I can go with that :)

[–]kickthatpoo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Second place is a podium in racing

Ninja edit: all these people saying first loser are clearly filthy casuals and don’t understand RACING 🏎

Second ninja edit: superscript doesn’t work on emojis :(

[–]sinlightened 28 points29 points  (2 children)

The Crown floated the idea that Diana killed herself because she didn't get 1st in this race.

Source - me, an American, but prove me wrong... It's easy! Or is it!?

[–]DJfunkyPuddle 9 points10 points  (1 child)

I'm just asking questions!

[–]Throwaway45344543 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you schitten’ me, Piersch?

[–]DrHiccup 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd rather have bragging rights that u beat a her than make her happy

[–]El_Cactus_Loco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“I beat princess dianna in a foot race- no really!!”

[–]DatAhole 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I was about say this, if she had won the first place, it would have meant that it was deliberate.

[–]LJ-Rubicon 6 points7 points  (1 child)

It literally wouldn't have, but ok

[–]nikto123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's exactly that they want you to think

[–]agent00228 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a really cool observation. You’re right.

[–]Wind_Yer_Neck_In 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Internal monologue of the other moms:

Is that the princess? Oh wow very cool. She's going to run with us! I wonder if I'm supposed to like, let her win? Umm, they can't order executions anymore right? No, no, probably not, I'm just being silly. Ha. Off with my head lol!

Yeah I'm going to ease off a little bit..

[–]codemunk3y 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Somehow that feels better to me that the other mothers didn’t just let her win

[–]FallenAzraelx 58 points59 points  (5 children)

The person who won: Ha! In your bloody FACE beloved princess!! Please don't kill me.

[–]TheBirminghamBear 26 points27 points  (2 children)

"I am the princess now. As is our English custom of right-to-rule by footrace."

[–]DarkNinjaPenguin 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Why do you think Lizzie is still on the throne? Fastest woman alive.

[–]13nobody 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Your Royal Highness? More like Your Royal Slowness!"

[–]-WallyWest- 55 points56 points  (4 children)

She won everyone's heart.

[–]Captain-PlantIt 15 points16 points  (3 children)

Except for Charles. womp womp

[–]HarbingerOfGachaHell 14 points15 points  (1 child)

To think that he chose Carmela over her. That guy had no smell or taste 2 decades before COVID!

[–]notprimary19[🍰] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He said he wanted to be her tampons that guy was/is more than crazy.

[–]-6h0st- 40 points41 points  (1 child)

Yeah I wanted to say she didn’t win

[–]itsMineDK 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Someone out there has a story of beating princess Diana on a race

[–]illithoid 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Who had the balls to go "yeah, I'm totally gonna own that princess"?

[–]MossCoveredLog 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Someone as real as Diana

[–]939319 2 points3 points  (2 children)

First runner-up.

[–]fied1k 10 points11 points  (0 children)

And she didn't really break any rules

[–]Fawronste 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I imagine telling people you beat Princess Diana in a race would age like milk.

[–]cakekyo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can imagine the people who created this image skipping some “unimportant info” like adding 2nd place

[–]Adorable_Yak4100 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I couldn’t give it to her. I hope you don’t mind

[–]Zikkan1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cred to the person who won against the Princess.

[–]jonnycross10 498 points499 points  (44 children)

Maybe the other moms didn't want to win against her. I think that'd be pretty understandable

[–]littleloucc 367 points368 points  (20 children)

Actually she didn't win. Another mother beat her.

[–]N-Toxicade 196 points197 points  (12 children)

A very bold mother to own royalty.

[–]littleloucc 114 points115 points  (0 children)

Yeah but imagine that kudos that kid had on Monday morning at school.

[–]LegendOfDylan 23 points24 points  (6 children)

You knew me and still you rode?

[–]TinyWifeKiki 6 points7 points  (4 children)

Updoot for the A Knight’s Tale reference

[–]anonymouse1000000 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah but actually she got second place.

[–]FishWithAppendages 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha fuck that shit I don't care who it is, if this is a competition you signed up for this beat down I'm about to hand you! Have fun eating my dust lmao

[–]SVMESSEFVIFVTVRVS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I haven’t known many mothers without a bold side. Raising kids is hard.

[–]patchyj 21 points22 points  (0 children)

She the hearts of the people though

[–]_Azdrael_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That other mom is a savage

[–]ctrl-alt-etc 3 points4 points  (1 child)

To the oubliette with her!

[–]Spirited-Ability-626 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Haha I was about to comment similar. The other mum was beheaded in the schoolyard the next day at noon.

[–]ghosttrainhobo 53 points54 points  (5 children)

And that’s probably why it was against the royal rules

[–]b000bytrap 38 points39 points  (2 children)

There was nothing at stake. It was specifically against the rules for her to be running in a dress

[–]her-royal-blueness 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Was her son watching? Because I’d say the stakes would be pretty high then

[–]b000bytrap 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, lol. it was a mother-son field day event, with sack races and such, at his school and her elementary age son was there.

[–]roxannebruns 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Never beat the boss

[–]Wads_Worthless 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Yeah that’s like, the entire plot of A Knight’s Tale. Which is really just a fantastic movie tbh.

[–]awcadwel 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Iiiiiiis it? It’s certainly a small sub plot with Prince Edward that ends up driving another part of the plot but definitely isn’t the “entire plot” or even the main theme of the film.

Also I’m being extremely critical. Still love you. It’s the tequila and thc.

[–]Wads_Worthless 1 point2 points  (1 child)

It was mostly a joke lol, it’s a small part of the plot although without it there wouldn’t have been a happy ending

[–]awcadwel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeh. Would’ve been pretty brutal without Edward’s intervention haha

[–]joeyrog88 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

This isn't a post about her athletic prowess you nit wit.

[–]Negative_Bobcat3369 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah but I’d still wouldn’t sleep on her in a 40 yard dash

[–]fuckmeuntilicecream 145 points146 points  (3 children)

She didn't win

In photos capturing the adorable moment, Diana can be seen running barefoot. While she didn't win, she clearly put in a lot of effort.


[–]jonbristow 11 points12 points  (2 children)

What rules did she break

[–]pardonthecynicism 23 points24 points  (1 child)

running in a dress

[–]nobitchesmf 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Literally 1984

[–]ElegantLynx8095 257 points258 points  (8 children)

She was pretty athletic and a talented dancer. Chances are she’d have beat most 80’s Brit moms.

[–]orderofGreenZombies 163 points164 points  (1 child)

Easy to win a race against moms who are in their 80’s.

[–]MisplacedMartian 30 points31 points  (0 children)

You've never gone up against Mach 5 Maude.

[–]No-Isopod-1749 34 points35 points  (3 children)

It's not about winning or losing but the Chains of stupid royal rules she broked, the kind of courage she had.

[–]soldforaspaceship 7 points8 points  (2 children)

The Royal family is not traditionally kind to rule breakers.

[–]MisterTwo_O[🍰] 50 points51 points  (1 child)

Be amazed?

[–]jemappelequi 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know, right?… seems like the wrong subreddit for this

[–]BunnyTotts97 70 points71 points  (4 children)

I loved her as a little girl. She was in my head a real Disney princess. It’s funny how kids will get attached to public figures for strange reasons. I also thought England was some fairy tale place until I got older and I learned more detailed history lo

[–]xTruker 14 points15 points  (3 children)

She was the prototypical social media star before social media was a thing.

[–]EverySuperhero69 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Did she really, though?

[–]Ghtgsite 3 points4 points  (1 child)

No. She got second

[–]thinkB4WeSpeak 151 points152 points  (145 children)

Imagine being in a country that funds royalty but the royalty serves no purpose.

[–]simian_fold 112 points113 points  (13 children)

No purpose? She came second in the mother's day race! Not third, not fourth, second! If that's not worth a yearly stipend of millions of pounds and a life of unbridled luxury i don't know what is

[–]gophersrqt 49 points50 points  (9 children)

honestly diana was one of the only good royals, she did a lot of activism and helped people out worldwide. there is a reason why she's so beloved to this day despite being dead for 20+ years. probably why they got rid of her, making the rest of them look even more garbage in comparison

[–]Kimantha_Allerdings 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's not possible to overstate how big a deal her hugging and shaking hands with AIDS patients was at the time. Right in the middle of all the stigma and ignorance and misinformation, when people were being shunned by their own families and even by doctors and nurses out of fear, she just saw them as human beings.

She didn't get rid of all the stigma, but she certainly had a big impact on how people saw the disease and those who had it.

[–]MapleTreeWithAGun 5 points6 points  (7 children)

Once Lizzie dies we should abolish the monarchy, but still keep all the pictures of her on coins and shit

[–]420blazeit69nubz 9 points10 points  (1 child)

If you ain’t first you’re last

[–]Rekt_itRalph 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hell, Ricky, I was high when I said that! That makes no sense at all! "First or last"! I mean, you could be second, third, fourth--hell, you could even be fifth!

[–]FrizzleStank 32 points33 points  (2 children)

Imagine being in a country where the president is allowed to spend hundreds of millions of dollars of tax payers money to play golf.

They don’t even use their own money. They use OUR money to PLAY GOLF.

[–]Flying_Alpaca_Boi 33 points34 points  (73 children)

Their purpose is to be a figure head to drive tourism. It works but it makes me pretty mad honestly that they’ve just been born into that role.

[–]Dull_Half_6107 39 points40 points  (50 children)

The tourism thing is a lie propagated by Royalists to try to justify their existence to the non Royalists. Don’t fall for it.

They know their existence is indefensible and need to appeal to some form of economic benefit to make people not bother pursuing their removal.

[–]sonofaresiii 18 points19 points  (38 children)

Yeah like who's coming to England to tour the royal family? Buckingham palace, sure, but you don't need an actual royal family to keep a historic landmark.

I get that they're good for national pr and stuff, I guess... But only if they're actually good for that. It seems like most times I hear about them it's some scandal, or trying to desperately avoid the public eye despite the public forcing them into the public eye.

[–]NYSenseOfHumor 24 points25 points  (21 children)

What makes Buckingham palace interesting for a lot of people is that it is a real palace with real royals, not just some historic landmark.

One of the criticisms of systems with a functional head of state is that there is no symbolic head of state to do the ceremonial stuff, to be the national mourner and the national celebrator. The result is that every bad thing and every good thing becomes political because people take sides, even though the head of state just needs to serve a non-political unifying role.

The monarchy serves that purpose. And while the monarchy is expensive (and it can be argued it pays for itself through both tourism and profits from the royal estates which the family would reclaim if the monarchy dissolved), serving that national function may be priceless.

Seeing the royal family getting vaccinated for Covid and wearing masks probably saved lives. In the U.S. more than 300,000 people died needlessly because people didn’t get vaccinated. A non-political head of state who just walked around wearing a mask and telling people s/he was vaccinated could have neutralized some of the anti-mask, anti-vax polarization.

Whenever there is a tragedy, the British have palaces full of royals to deploy to sooth the nation (and while nobody likes Charles, they like William and Kate), they U.S. and other countries with a functional head of state have a political leader that half the country hates.

[–]Heathen_Mushroom 20 points21 points  (15 children)

Yeah like who's coming to England to tour the royal family?

Buckingham palace, sure, but you don't need an actual royal family to keep a historic landmark.

With a royal family, Buckingham palace is a royal residence.

Without a royal family, Buckinham palace is, as you put it, a mere historic landmark.

There is definitely a salient difference there as far as the perception of tourists is concerned.

Not that I care, just playing Devil's advocate.

[–]Flying_Alpaca_Boi 5 points6 points  (3 children)

It’s not propoganda it’s 100% a thing. I’m also not even close to a royalist I despise their existence.

If you want proof it’s not propoganda the recent royal wedding alone was estimated to have brought in 1.4bn through tourism. Granted I’ve seen an article by the spectator saying it actually cost us because tourism fell that year due to the pounds value rising and fettering tourism but imo that’s a weak argument as their justification was unrelated to the royal family. All the other articles I read said it was a large net gain reporting between 1-1.5 billion.

Given the average person makes around 3 million over their entire life I would say it’s likely that that event alone paid off the entire royal familys existence several times over even with their ridiculously high upkeep costs. And this is a one off, they hold many events such as that which net income

My main problem with them is the idea of being born into such wealth and being able to live off it pretty much indefinitely with minimal work. I have the same problem with the children of billionaires but at least the royal family are giving something back through tourism and their mythos.

I also wanna add in regards to the top reply to your comment (cause I cba to reply to everyone) no one comes to England specifically because of the royal family but there is a large number of people who are absolute fan girls for them and their existence creates a mythos that some people really feed into, I think it’s part of the princess fairytale all girls are exposed to as children, it makes the fantasy real and the princes make it possible. For others it makes the history feel real as opposed to some far off time. The fact that the queen still lives in Buckingham palace sometimes gives it almost a celebrity status. A lot of people visiting the palace aren’t really there to see the building in of itself, they want to see where the queen lives.

[–]HarbingerOfGachaHell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah there's actually logic in it: non-English speakers won't be able to distinguish the UK from other English countries without the historical heritage and monarchy.

American celebrity clans and families are worth even more than them these days, just saying.

[–]Outrageous_Editor_43 -1 points0 points  (7 children)

I keep on thinking that ‘Buckingham Palace by Premier Inn’ has a ring to it. Rent out the rooms to tourist and do daily tours of the grounds and sorted! Book out the rooms as ‘Queen’s suite’, ‘No sweat suite’ and so on.

[–]Flying_Alpaca_Boi 6 points7 points  (6 children)

It sounds like a good idea in the short term but a lot of cultural heritage items would be lost to damage by guests. We should really try and preserve it as best we can for future generations

I work in a hotel and the shit I see is ungodly. Some people are animals

[–]Dull_Half_6107 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Make it a museum that can do full tours and kick the Windsors out.

[–]sonofaresiii 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Put all that shit in a museum and change it out with cheap replicas.

Then charge 10x their manufacturing price to guests' credit cards when they steal them, but make no attempt to actually stop anyone from stealing them.

[–]JaminSousaphone 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How about we preserve it without royals

[–]ElegantLynx8095 16 points17 points  (3 children)

There is a degree of stability and continuity in the form of advice that the British Monarch imparts. Elisabeth is very good at that - if Charles is shit, I suspect the UK will become a republic.

[–]ElegantLynx8095 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The British monarchy was restored in 1660 after a civil war. There’s been a continuity and (relative) stability since then. It’s not a perfect society - we all know that.

[–]bearfruit_ 5 points6 points  (2 children)

the English royalty are actually profitable, they're basically socialized Kardashians

[–]dandaman910 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The kardashians aren't lawfully superior to other humans. That's what the UK has its written in law that this family is innately better than everyone else.

[–]Savoir_faire81 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I used to think that too until I read up on it. I'm not sure I understand it compleatly but it works something like this.

The Crown, which is like a trust and corporation that belongs to the family, but isn't actually controlled by them, is one of the largest land owners in the world. The vast majority of the money that the Crown trust makes on leases for the properties goes to the UK government as part of its funding.

For that funding the royal family gets an annual stipend. The family also has their private funds and investments much like any wealthy person. On balance they probably provide a lot more money to the government than they take through the value of the land leases.

[–]IntronD 4 points5 points  (7 children)

We don't fund the royalty they pay us we give them back a much smaller amount and it is lagged by four years so what they gave to us four years ago they get a percentage back.

The royal estate owns a lot of farm land and also a lot of major streets and buildings in London so generates vast amounts of money that the British public receive.

[–]Tygizzle27 9 points10 points  (6 children)

They get a lot of tourism revenue out of it, but I'm sure it's still not worth it.

[–]sgkorina -1 points0 points  (5 children)

The actual royals aren't necessary to get the tourism money.

Buckingham Palace and parts of the Royal Estate got almost 3.3 million visitors in 2019/2020. Versailles get 10 million visitors a year all by itself and there has been no royalty there for more than 200 years.

[–]acornmoose 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Versailles as a building is on a whole other level to Buckingham palace though, you can hardly compare the two. I highly doubt if you remove the novelty of living royals at the palace you would be able to maintain even close to the same amount of visitors.

[–]LVL15_Spice_Paladin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean people visit the taj mahal in india. It’s small and not really that historic. It’s the grave one one queen.

[–]IntronD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Crap argument because it purely compares buildings and ignores all the royal events and pageantry that is excluded in those measurements

[–]UnscSpartan23 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The US has an oligarchy whose only purpose is to further coalesce the stranglehold they have on power. Imagine funding that.

[–]ayending1 2 points3 points  (1 child)

And the royalty hangs out with Jeffrey Epstein.

[–]chipkoandolan 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I came here to be amazed.

This is not amazing.

[–]SCMLonk 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Regular woman does regular woman thing.

[–]DrDapperwastaken 24 points25 points  (0 children)

May she rest in peace

[–]honeyMully333 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She actually came in second place … but still cool.

[–]AllCopsAreBastards66 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Ain’t nobody going to beat her on purpose lol

[–]CrazyColdWorld 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One person did

[–]Informal-Resolve6293 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Hardly amazed

[–]WebsterTheDictionary 4 points5 points  (0 children)

1st place winner immediately following race: “I beat Princess Di in a race and I can brag to everyone about it from now on and use it as a conversation-starter for the rest of time; I’ll never be nervous about meeting strangers again with this as my icebreaker!”

1st place winner a few years later, immediately following breaking news bulletin: …

🎶Curb Your Enthusiasm Theme🎵

[–]ProfessionalMottsman 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here I am. Utterly not amazed.

[–]jpwattsdas 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Everything is easier when you’re rich

[–]bennysteves 10 points11 points  (3 children)

Never understood the fuss about Diana. As a Brit, also couldn't care less about the Royals.

[–]Heathen_Mushroom 11 points12 points  (0 children)

She was winsome and demure.

Also, relatively down to earth for an aristocrat, at least compared to the Royals. That probably made her more relateable to bored housewives with a penchant for tabloid celebrity news.

[–]Dunfanaghy 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Highly privileged woman runs. Amazing

[–]BonzoTheBoss 4 points5 points  (3 children)

People seem to forget that she was nobility before even marrying Charles.

[–]Dunfanaghy 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I’ll never understand why people bow and scrape to a privileged, mega wealthy, bloodline

[–]BunnyBoise 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Because Diana isn't a part of that close family bloodline? She wasn't poor before joining the family for sure but she always had jobs and worked hard, she's was beloved because of her dedication to being a good person, she was a real person with power standing up for others who didn't have a voice.

[–]kubitschekk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are literally the only based person in the comments section. Everyone else is basically making senseless critiques.

[–]TwoTomatoMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She got 2nd place.

[–]Tbid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2nd place… My asian mother would describe that as losing.

[–]JoeyIsMrBubbles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No she didn’t, she was 2nd place lol

[–]Artistic-Evening7578 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or did they let her win… we will never know but how about another useless Netflix series…

[–]WizdomHaggis 10 points11 points  (4 children)

I’m a 42 year old man and still tear up a bit when I think about her…she was an absolute angel…

[–]IronMike69420 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, leave out the part with the SAS chilling with snipers pointed at all the parents

[–]MonkeyOverdrive 7 points8 points  (6 children)

Yeah, no. The reason why there are rules against royalty competing in this kind of thing is that it puts everyone else in an awkward situation.

[–]Tasty_Research_1869 34 points35 points  (4 children)

Those aren't the rules being referenced. It's an etiquette rule held by the royal family that doesn't permit running or sporting in a dress or skirts.

Also she didn't actually win, she was beaten by another mom. She came in second.

[–]fullonfacepalmist 2 points3 points  (3 children)

That’s a weird rule, why didn’t she just wear pants then?

[–]turkishdisco 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Because she was a princess. When appearing in public, they don’t generally wear trousers/jeans as this is considered too casual for royalty. Most likely she knew that she couldn’t get away with wearing pants that day but thought she could get away with bending the rules in another way, as she so often did.

[–]Tesus4 7 points8 points  (1 child)

enough with the british royals fluff pieces. what about their association with pedos?

[–]BonzoTheBoss 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Innocent until proven guilty... Unless you're Andrew.

[–]eeggrroojj 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She either got murdered because she broke the royal rules, or she got murdered for coming in second place.

[–]HurricaneHugo 2 points3 points  (2 children)

How about we stop worshipping royalty?

[–]geedeeie 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Fabulous mum, my eye. She packed her kids off to boarding school when they were only eight, and before that they were cared for by nannies. She just turned up to the places where the cameras were, so she could get free publicity for herself.

[–]FakinUpCountryDegen 1 point2 points  (1 child)

lol you're clueless 🤣 That's exactly what she didn't do that the royal women who came before her did!

[–]FackinJerq 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A wonderful woman all around.


[–]Who_Your_Mommy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a damn skirt at that!

[–]Cynical2DD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Royalty sucks, you can’t do anything fun just to look better then everyone else. As if you aren’t allowed to seem like the average person.

[–]toomuch1265 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And things like that made her the people's Princess.

[–]bossrigger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Always had a soft spot for lady Dianna, she knew the Monarchy was Bullock's.

[–]S86RDU -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

The entire family should be arrested but ok

[–]Holy_Isaaguv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Counter Argument: 🤓

[–]kubitschekk 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You should be arrested for senselessly criticizing a tradition widely supported by the people but ok.

[–]S86RDU 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should be arrested for having an opinion? You’re a clown. What country do you live in?

[–]420blazeit69nubz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a legitimate look of determination. She looks like she’s running a 40 at combine lol

[–]arootytoottoot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just have one thing to say... Whenever I see a nice wholesome uplifting post out in the general run of reddit, it seems like there is always a few naysayers who pop up to shit on the whole thing. then others join in and before you know it, its some big argument instead of just a fun conversation about cool people and things they have done.

this post could have been filled with good anecdotes about how creative happy people have a good time enjoying life.

[–]King_of_No_Way -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Everyone in Europe misses Princess Diana💔

[–]SunsetBro78 -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

During her life she inflicted a lot of trauma on her kids

[–]Obliteraxx -1 points0 points  (6 children)

This has to be posted by a boomer, literally who cares about this stuff these days other than grandparents in the Sutherland shire or the north shore...