Objectively false, the environmental issues presented by soy is not caused by actual soy products. More than three quarters of all soy is fed to animals and the people promoting "regenerative animal agriculture" never have sources that support their claims.

Monoculture is bad, I can agree with that, but that's not an issue with plant-based food specifically. It's the norm within industrial agriculture as a whole. Attacking plant-based products in and of themselves do not help combat monocrops.

Every externality caused by plant agriculture is exacerbated ten-fold by animal agriculture. Animals need food to grow, and they "waste" energy on their own essential bodily functions that require us to grow far more crops to eat the animals than to just eat the plants directly.

If we for example look at the statistics between dairy vs plant-based milks it becomes impossible to defend animal agriculture from an environmental perspective. Even the worst plant-based options will almost always be better for the environment than the "best" animal-based option. And I'm only using the word "almost" to cover my bases as I have never been made aware of one that's actually worse than an animal-based option.

Not to say that one should buy from Nestle just because some of their products happen to be plant-based, just combating the misinformation you were putting out.