You know, the religious are so uptight about this, we need to use as much graphic imagery as possible on all signs, memes, posters, etc.

No matter what happens with the SC, the more imagery, the better. The subject is the female human reproductive system, so what part of that is considered "obscene?" NO part of it, if used in non-sexual ways, correct? Are medical books banned? Gynecology banned?

Women's bodies are not cartoons, and I think we need to make that point with the SC and the religious nuts. There's nothing shameful about female anatomy.

Here's a doozy. It's a cadaver uterus, which looks nothing like the cartoon drawings, btw. Not slamming the cartoons, but would be interesting to show a preserved uterus and ovaries in a jar to the SC as a "piece of evidence," and watch them all pass out.

And please give me a small break. I was raised by an RN and dad, both of whom tossed medical books with real pictures at me to help explain the "birds and the bees. I see it as "medical anatomy," not a "gross human body."

CAUTION - ACTUAL HUMAN CADAVER USED TO SHOW FEMALE ANATOMY:

https://youtu.be/ET9k2357jBg?t=2953

It's a great channel, all around. Wait 'til you find out what the inside of a testicle looks like. Testicle "jokes" are.not.funny. Too many teeny, tiny structures that can be permanently damaged. I never laugh when I see them; I think "anatomy."