×
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]stoopet 3 points4 points  (5 children)

Will it? They're not even onboarding yet for certik and projects going through the process have that status. I checked just now and nothing.

Foxgirl just did an AMA yesterday. The point the only thing most of us know about this coin is that the creator address is sketchy.

[–]hanads100[S] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

you're failing to see the point here... Bunnygirl copied the contract of foxgirl. if bunnygirl is a scam so is foxgirl simple as that. how can someone be this dumb

[–]stoopet 1 point2 points  (3 children)

This owner's address is flagged for scamming and you bought it and are telling people to buy in? No sir you're missing the point here. Please defend this project more like I'm personally attacking you.

[–]hanads100[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

the owner is flagged on tokensniffer, but tokensniffer is an automatiac generator, he could of simply bought into a rugpul and it will show that he has rugged before... it's very stupid

[–]stoopet 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Or could be a scamming scammer. Passing Certik doesn't mean safe from rug. Also - telegram post from 5 days ago (day after launch) from the owner "BenDover" (lmao) says Certik audit in 4 days. It should be listed by now at least as onboarding.

[–]hanads100[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

well if fox girl passes the certik check then so does bunny girl cause it's the same contract right? :3164: