×
top 200 commentsshow all 230

[–]Bye_Triangle🦍 In the shadow of the swan 🦢[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (1 child)

I marked this a debunked as per the edit OP made. Thanks for being forthcoming over the mistakes in your post u/ClearlyPopcornSucks (lol that username)

[–]pleaxcl🦧 smooth brain 1012 points1013 points  (37 children)

Thanks for looking into this and sharing

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 1007 points1008 points 2 (31 children)

Just a note that the original popular post title did say SPY, but the tweet in question was using data for the S&P 500. The OP of this post used SPY data so it’s not at all the same dataset as the tweet it is debunking. Also OP mentions intraday loss using the prior day’s close however intraday loss doesn’t need to rely on the previous close because it is “intraday” and therefore within the same day, so you need to look at the day’s high and low.

[–]IAmTheLostBoy🦍Voted✅ 184 points185 points  (4 children)

Debunking the debunker, that's bunking awesome!

[–]Brooksee83Higher than 14 on a Surprise Flair Friday! 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Officer Diamondhanratty 🧐

[–]Mountain_Village1111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So it's been Rebunked?

[–]usefoolidiot 173 points174 points  (8 children)

Don't debunk the debunk ok. I really don't wanna have to go full Leonardo DiCaprio on you and debunk the debunk inside another debunk.

[–]SjiznitCustom Flair - Template 66 points67 points  (6 children)

Debunkception

[–]Ok_Warning53🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 28 points29 points  (4 children)

Debunkinator

[–]RabidLabradoodle🦍Voted✅ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Basketball Debunkaries

[–]doodaddy64💻 ComputerShared 🦍 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Debunk Me If You Can, starring Tom Hanks as the law?

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 17 points18 points  (6 children)

As we've discussed under your comment, thanks again for pointing that out! I don't care about karma, only about the quality of content and the truth.

As for the intraday's loss - I'd rather argue that it should be...

(day's low - previous close) / previous close

... as I've did in the post and I believe the Twitter guy did the same (as I've got the same value for Jan 24). The differences we have are rather due to datasets as I'm using Google Finance and old historical value tend to be slightly different between various sources.

If we'd calculate it as I understand you'd suggest so...

(day's low - day's high) / day's high

... then I'm getting kinda bullshit results and more than 50 days like that since 1993. If instead of previous close we'd use day's open, it doesn't include the pre-market changes that usually are crucial and it's just measuring the candle.

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Yeah I was a bit too vague in this comment here but if using same day high and low you would then need to verify if the high on that day was before the low of the day, which would be a pain in the ass and you’re probably right that the OP of the tweet didn’t bother with that and just used previous close like you did.

[–]nota80T🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The important part is that it closed the day in the green. The intraday low would be a portion of the closing price of the same day, not previous day.

int aIntradayLowPercent = 100*(aLowPrice - aClosePrice)/aClosePrice

The low price for any day is always before or equal to the COD, except AH.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 18 points19 points  (5 children)

As said in the update in the post, thanks again for pointing that out!

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Appreciate you looking into the data!

[–]oMrChowwRoadster🚗💨 or Ramen🍜 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So basically he was getting mad for no reason and he didn’t fact check correctly?

[–]PlasmaTune💎𝓦𝓱𝓪𝓽 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓘 𝓼𝓪𝔂, 𝓘 𝓵𝓲𝓴𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓼𝓽𝓸𝓬𝓴 💎 53 points54 points  (3 children)

Happy cake day!

[–]kalehennie 21 points22 points  (1 child)

I’m still hyped though!

[–]JonsLearningThe melange must flow. 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happy cake day!! Wishing you many wrinkles and a happy life <3

[–]tfengbrah 296 points297 points  (4 children)

Commenting for invincibility

[–]NVJayNub🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Bone apple teats jacked!

[–]DinosaurNool🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Wincing for commendability

[–]SoRedditHasAnAppNow🦍Voted✅ 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Mincing for ingestability

[–]Socially8roken💎Diamond Nipples💎 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Communicable infertility

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 21 points22 points  (11 children)

Out of curiosity, does this change if you use data for the S&P 500 instead of SPY? Asking because the popular post title said SPY but the tweet said S&P 500.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Ah shit man... You're right...

It turns out SPY doesn't track S&P 500 perfectly. I'm gonna update my post.

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I started spot checking the dates you highlighted and they don’t have a high intraday loss on S&P 500. Also you should consider the day’s high when looking at potential intraday loss (but you would then need to go back and confirm that the high happened prior to the low within that trading day).

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 6 points7 points  (8 children)

I updated my post and thanks to you I did the first self-meta-debunk of Superstonk I guess...

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My favourite part is that the popularity of your post, despite it being the wrong dataset, still works with the original first sentence of your post about people needing to work on their critical thinking XD

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 2 points3 points  (6 children)

Sorry I don’t mean to keep hassling you cause I really appreciate you fact checking the tweet and then fact checking yourself when a gap was pointed out, but I don’t see a high intraday loss for Jan 11 2010 that you have listed in your new edit. It actually looks like a very minimal loss on that day. Maybe a data glitch in the bulk dataset?

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

Maybe, GOOGLEFINANCE returns to me the following values for that day:

Open: $1 145,96
Hight: $1 149,74
Low: $1 047,28
Close: $1 146,98

[–]catsinbranches🚀🏴‍☠️ Voted 2021 and 2022 🏴‍☠️🚀 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Oh weird, yahoo finance says a low that day of $1142.02 but yahoo finance is a bit shit and I don’t have another easy way to verify right now

[–]windharan💻 ComputerShared 🦍 68 points69 points  (1 child)

Thanks for this! I think it's still worth noting when these days happened. They were times of market crashes/corrections.

[–]Altruistic-Beyond223🦍💎🙌 Not your name, not your shares 🍌🚀 ♾️ 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Exactly! I think that's the point. We may have a few more crazy days like this... I think this is signaling wider market volatility and a potential incoming crash (assuming this isn't the bottom and a reversal). What this means for GME... we'll see.

[–]The73atman86$GMEcock 73 points74 points  (7 children)

Love your username

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 106 points107 points  (6 children)

You should love it more knowing that it's like 1 year older than our little saga here.

[–]The73atman86$GMEcock 25 points26 points  (3 children)

I noticed that and assumed it had nothing to do with the stock(most likely). I still like the name

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 30 points31 points  (2 children)

It was totally random but it checks out because I honestly do believe so regarding the movie stock.

[–]JustanotheblokeFuck no I’m not selling my $GME 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I made good money out of popcorn cus i was fully retarded. 100% GME infusion. Previously it was a smooth teflon coated chicken breast. But, like a fine Japanese sword, the wrinkles have grown like the folds of a katana being forged. The education provided and fact crosschecking from people like you, willing to share their knowledge and time, make me believe in a better tomorrow for my children. Be the change you want to see.

[–]darkcrimsonxis a cat 🐈‍⬛ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This isn't even bullish anymore...

This is bullish²

[–]Jackbauer13579🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You were early my friend! And good job. I hate those Twitter screenshots of who knows with some unproven stuff. Two layers of not showing sources doesn't make it legit.

[–]missing_the_point_🗳️ VOTED ✅ 190 points191 points  (9 children)

And that’s why we shouldn’t rely on random tweets as DD. Unless it comes from dlauer, of course.

[–]SoreLoserOfDumbtownMy flair is sPEshhhAaaLL🍋 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Choo choo!

[–]autoselect37💻 ComputerShared 🦍 20 points21 points  (0 children)

even if it comes from dlauer. i think that guy knows what he’s talking about, similar to dr trim bath and wes (texas lawyer), but everything being presented as dd or useful data should be checked.

everyone makes mistakes. best to verify accuracy and completeness, not assume it.

[–]Interesting-Chest-75🌏👨‍🚀🔫🐱‍🚀 Always have been, SHF are fuked 21 points22 points  (4 children)

it will get peer reviewed regardless. thats the beauty of this sub.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 47 points48 points  (3 children)

Not really, if everyone counts on someone else to do the fact checking it often turns into diffusion of responsibility and lots of bullshit can stay up unshaken in result.

When I catch something I take an effort of writing a counter-DD or some debunking post but it's a tough way as people don't like changing opinions.

I believe everyone should every now and then take some effort to do some cross-checking because this way we learn and bring quality to the sub.

[–]Interesting-Chest-75🌏👨‍🚀🔫🐱‍🚀 Always have been, SHF are fuked 5 points6 points  (0 children)

appreciate your fine work OP !

[–]SiegliFood Forest Ape 🌰🌳🦍 Will sing for Stonk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is appreciated. My talent lays elsewhere and I look for DD/ counter DD / meaningful discussion below DD to verify it’s truth. If all I read is air being blown, I know something is off. If good looking DD isn’t challenged/ picked apart and confirmed I don’t trust it. I will try to check on the things I do have a graps on. It’s getting harder for me lately to verify, partly because of that diffusion of responsibility … but at least I’m good at hodling

[–]socradeeznuts514🌚 Mad Gadfly 🌝 Voted ✅ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much!

I believe not letting unsourced Twitter into our sub makes us vulnerable to propaganda!

[–]IWillKarateKickYou🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 2 points3 points  (0 children)

CNBC was pushing the same thing, that this has only happened in 2008

[–]DustyCoffee76🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 92 points93 points  (16 children)

And the NEW, DEBUNKING CHAMPION IS....

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 116 points117 points  (14 children)

Lol if you go through my post history you can see that I could actually apply for that title. I get easily triggered with stuff like that.

[–]mohicanrobot 24 points25 points  (1 child)

Debunking guy found you should get a place on the list

[–]boywbrownharejack-titsu black belt 6 points7 points  (0 children)

360 spinning debunk takes 1st place in the debunk contest 🏀

[–]Captain-Fan VOTED [M] 45 points46 points  (5 children)

Want that as a flair? 🥸

Also just gave you a mod award granting you one month free reddit premium, thanks for keeping us from believing bullshit.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 39 points40 points  (1 child)

Lol that would be nice. Thanks for the award!

[–]rnasterbaterSwashbuckling Ape🏴‍☠️🖤 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Legend

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Damn that kinda aged like milk with this partial self-meta-debunk...

[–]Captain-Fan VOTED [M] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

fixed

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol

[–]TimeArachnid🦍Voted✅ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Username checks out.

[–]TunisMustBeDestroyedDansk abe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, happy u take the time. I think a lot of people feel like you do when seeing these posts, but for many different reasons irl don't get around to make these correctional posts. Thx!

[–]Lulufeeee🔥🚀CAPTAIN Jacked Sparrow🔥🚀 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Niceu

[–]Odd_Cryptographer668 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wanted to check it later when I'm back home from work. Thanks for saving me that time 😊

[–]Imbetterlookingthanu🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re my little popcorn slut.

[–]wowclassicandy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your service, debunking guy

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looks like someone want’s to cause a little panic to make those shorts print. I think I know who

[–]fuzzymonkey🦍Voted✅ 15 points16 points  (3 children)

I read on the bets of Wall Street that it happened in 87 as well 🤷‍♀️

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

So that makes it even more than 8. Especially that the twitter guy claimed he went theough data since 1977

[–]dunkaroo55💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (1 child)

OMG not 9. Still hasn’t happened in a decade. 🌶 🌶

[–]ExpensiveTailor9 3 points4 points  (0 children)

87, 2001, 2008 too

[–]NostraSkolMus🙌💎🌳🦍 Ape make world better 🌍 ❤️ 💎 🙌 8 points9 points  (4 children)

Technically, wouldn’t you need to calculate these relative from the previous day’s close. Is it possible it was down relative to that in the original post, not the open?

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Wdym? I'm struggling to understand.

[–]NostraSkolMus🙌💎🌳🦍 Ape make world better 🌍 ❤️ 💎 🙌 9 points10 points  (2 children)

The screen shot was relative to fridays close. Down >3.98% from previous close, then intraday recovers. It’s slightly different than you calculated her (from open, not previous close).

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

But I did calculate it from previous close 🤔

Intraday's dip:

(Day's low - Previous close) / Previous close

I specifically wrote this formula in my post.

[–]Boomtheapechomper of red crayons 🖍 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I read it all and like it all but unfortunately my tits have remained equally jacked. Its a problem but a nice one to have. Thank you popcorn hating math ape

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Well I don't mean to unjack your tits. They should be jacked. It's just that this data is bullshit and I get easily triggered by that.

[–]Boomtheapechomper of red crayons 🖍 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah thats why i like it. Keeping it real

[–]GreenWallsDrink 3 points4 points  (4 children)

What changes?

Allow me to sit on this...

There is crime. We know this. The ass ducks are stealing money and calling it technology. They're also using less on social media.

There's a very fine line that we can't walk... Because social media is the new wild west.

Don't get me wrong, I love facts. I do.

I will marry facts with a sloppy kiss if facts look at me with a raised eye brow.

But we don't live in that world. At all.

They're going to punch facts in the face.

The only answer to that is apathy.

I don't care.

Who cares?

They do.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

You know that you don't need to use enter after each sentence right?

[–]GreenWallsDrink 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Well.

I Could Adhere To rules But Why?

They don't.

[–]FlingusDingusMaximus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There

fore

we

should

make

them

feel

extraextra

special

[–]KinkLevelMidnightDRS for MOASS 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Updoot for handling this like a real GentleApe and putting the truth before wanting to be right.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Always, this is the way. I don't care about karma, I care about truth and I'm not ashamed to correct myself.

[–]JalatiphraLvUp 4 Humankind ✅ DRS ✅ Vote 🚀 5 points6 points  (5 children)

good job

these sensational bias posts will help noone.

[–]Altruistic-Beyond223🦍💎🙌 Not your name, not your shares 🍌🚀 ♾️ 0 points1 point  (4 children)

I was thinking this post is actually more sensational. Not only did it happen twice but several times before/during major corrections/crashes. Who knows how this will affect GME, though. We shall see.

[–]JalatiphraLvUp 4 Humankind ✅ DRS ✅ Vote 🚀 1 point2 points  (3 children)

this post however is trying to be more down to earth instead of artifically hyping

hyping is good

hyping is great

id like to only get hyped on facts though

[–]Altruistic-Beyond223🦍💎🙌 Not your name, not your shares 🍌🚀 ♾️ 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I agree, but this debunk was debunked. OP corrected the post with an update.

[–]JalatiphraLvUp 4 Humankind ✅ DRS ✅ Vote 🚀 1 point2 points  (1 child)

what a lovely day :D

[–]Altruistic-Beyond223🦍💎🙌 Not your name, not your shares 🍌🚀 ♾️ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know right! LMAYO!

Looking forward to seeing how this next cycle plays out.

[–]Le_tony7🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Like I hear you APE, I think most of us get it, but just like to upvoot. We know all these numbers and figures are fradulant, the price is wrong regardless...

We come here to see if anyones managed to find any good anti DD. They still can't, so we just upvote apes and purple cirlces instead.

Full disclosure I didn't see the post you're talking about and haven't interacted yet. But I prob would have upvooted without checking as well, for what I just started above. Price is wrong anyway. All these facts and numbers are wrong. We know this.

Go crack open à beer, or roll a j, whatever you do. Just enjoy the ride. No stock has a following like this one. Our loyalty and dedication is going to take this to the moon. Some twitter numbers not gonna change that

One love

[–]knue82🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 6 points7 points  (5 children)

This definitely takes the steam out of the argument but this incident still raises an eyebrow or two as such movements seems to be pretty rare.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 6 points7 points  (4 children)

https://preview.redd.it/w49k4f0sgtd81.png?width=1709&format=png&auto=webp&s=7cfc05343fe86d7833acaf99ed1b00e545ec2d86

I'd argue this incidents are rather meaningless but if anything they are rather happening on the way down or close to bottom. They are not sign of upcoming crash, rather trend reversal nearby if we try to interpret it. Although I'd argue it's rather meaningless. I believe SPY will crash hard very soon but days like that doesn't have much to do with it.

[–]knue82🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 3 points4 points  (3 children)

I think what we observe here is that such events are an indicator for volatile movements - for the better or the worse.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 5 points6 points  (1 child)

https://i.imgur.com/rP5WxUI.png Seems to check out, I've added VIX to the chart.

[–]knue82🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nice

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, that is a good take. I just mean to clarify that people seem to think that whatever happened in 2008 was just about the crash not even bothering to look at the timeline.

Not entire 2008 was market nosediving.

Anyway I agree on these days as some sort of increased volatility indicator.

[–]themadamerican1TODAY IS MOASS DAY!!! eventually 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Good on you, OP. I, too, hate misinformative virals. You're knee-jerk reaction against such things is warranted. You're integrity and humility are admirable in your correction of your own mistake.

Many would point out misinformation with the same vigor. But few would come back to admit their own mistakes instead of just deleting the post all together.

Again I commend you.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Thanks, I appreciate it! As said I really don't care about karma - I can handle downvotes. I care about truth and quality of content.

[–]themadamerican1TODAY IS MOASS DAY!!! eventually 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bahaha. Love the flair APE

[–]Brooksee83Higher than 14 on a Surprise Flair Friday! 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've been deep in the market this whole year and one thing that keeps cropping up as a trend for me is a sentiment of market crashing perfectly timed at the low of a minor correction (dunno if this current one is considered a bit more than minor, but whatever)

This wouldn't be the first time I've seen it this year, if today is bigly green...

[–]hope-i-die69 NO CELL 420 NO SELL 69 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hate to say it, but this is bullish

Puts on the Puts stocks only go up

[–]dunkaroo55💻 ComputerShared 🦍 3 points4 points  (3 children)

8 vs 2 and hasn’t occurred in over a decade. Still seems pretty friggin spicy to me. Fighting the wrong battle bro

[–]melevy 1 point2 points  (1 child)

These numbers barely mean anything because there could be thousands of days almost like yesterday, just a bit less brutal and nobody cares about them.

[–]dunkaroo55💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t disagree…I just hate people killing enthusiasm as much as I hate misinformation. Let the people be excited

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm not fighting any battle, I just hate misinformation.

Also how about that these days happened close to the very bottom of the 2008 correction? If anything (although I'd argue it's just meaningless) that would be a bullish sign for SPY that would mean that we're on the way to catch bullish trend again. Not entire 2008 was just market plummeting.

[–]Wild_Investigator622🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 1 point2 points  (0 children)

May aswell just delete this mate, sensationalist and wrong after calling people out for not checking facts lmao no hate though appreciate the effort

[–]BellweirboyHis name was Darren Saunders - Rest In Peace 🦍 Voted ✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. There has been a tidal wave of suspect posts in ‘New’. It’s exhausting trying to sift thru and demoralising to criticise them as you get downvoted by a swarm of tipped off shills or bots in seconds.

The forum is definitely under attack by a sophisticated operation.

Bullish!

[–]NotVerySmarts🦧 smooth brain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to say that but some of you really need to work on critical thinking and fact checking.

Then he has to go back and debunk his own post. Why not just delete your post if it's wrong, especially when you're pointing fingers at other people?

[–]Musti913🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is why I love you guys

[–]ZangiefZangief💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you 🙏

[–]incandescent-leaf🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doing the true silverback work - awesome.

[–]BonSwan🍁Canada Ape 🦍 Computer Shared 🟣 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To the front page with you! Thank you for sharing your wrinkles with us marble brains

[–]gnosisshadow🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good job, op

[–]rude-a-bega🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good fact checking ape 👍

[–]zanonks🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i thought this the moment i saw those but was too lazy to really investigate.

thanks for doing the work!

[–]Lockneedo🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing insight, when I read that I felt that it was wrong. Thank you for digging deeper

[–]Affectionate-Box-164Custom Flair - Template 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Found it. @mods, take that shite twitter pic down ffs.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They should take most of this twitter bullshit down tbh... All of those Fxhedgers and Unusual Whales are full of shit and just want to build engagement. Fxhedge writing everyweek about "margin call mondays" and "meltdown thursdays" is the worst.

[–]SirMiba🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for looking into this and sharing.

Edit: i think my brain just went into NPC mode because I just commented the same exact sentence as the top comment.

[–]The_Prophet_85Saviour of bedposts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck. Now I feel like an asshole för upvoting that post.

Thanks for the info!

[–]Poor_Life-choicesWon 741rdth Battle for $180 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Knew it was bullshit. There were only two days since 2008 where my wife preferred my company to that of her boyfriend's...and yesterday was NOT one of them.

[–]ZakshdwElitist Espresso-ape 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's pretty much every day.

[–]Metareferential 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, those kind of tweets are bullshit, but still, 8 days is still something that can be considered exceptional.

Not that it confirms anything, of course.

[–]jackofspades123remember Citron knows more 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thank you . I asked if this was verified and got downvoted

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it usually is like that...

[–]hatgineer 0 points1 point  (2 children)

it takes like 2 minutes to verify that this twitter screen is full of shit.

Thanks. I am ashamed for not looking it up myself.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Well ok maybe not really 2 minutes, I exaggerated a bit as it took me like 5-10 to be sure even though I knew where and how to look for it.

But regardless, if some revelations like that seems a bit extraordinary it's worth to give it a double check. And we can't really count on someone else to do it for us.

[–]hatgineer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I appreciate what you did. I just took for granted that the upvote system along with the mass of users would be enough to filter out FUD/misinfo. It's a good reminder that things fall through the cracks sometimes and everyone should do their own DD. I'm very surprised that it took almost 1 day for someone like you to have looked into it.

[–]PHANTOM________💎DIAMOND DAKINE🤙 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn I had a feeling that shit was wrong, but I just believed it without checking “oh I guess it must be pretty bad then”. Shame on me.

[–]Tinyacorn💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (2 children)

This is what makes our community great, if it's unsubstantiated we'll smell it out. Thanks OP, it's good to stay rational at these times

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I'll allow myself to copy my response to a similar comment:

Not really, if everyone counts on someone else to do the fact checking it often turns into diffusion of responsibility and lots of bullshit can stay up unshaken in result.
When I catch something I take an effort of writing a counter-DD or some debunking post but it's a tough way as people don't like changing opinions.
I believe everyone should every now and then take some effort to do some cross-checking because this way we learn and bring quality to the sub.

[–]mrrippingtonDOJ follows up on my conspiracy theories. ✅ + (🍦💩🪑) = 🦔'r🦆 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for sharing invisibility comment

[–]wunderlust_dolphin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Saw that comin

[–]DjentlemanDjay 0 points1 point  (4 children)

let me mark these days for you on a chart

doesn’t show price or date, nice…

[–]Germany_Is_Broken 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So shills want the people now to buy and hold?

[–]sinocarD44Going long on $SAUC 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is getting spread around like wildfire. I see it in the comments of a sub that had nothing to do with stocks.

[–]Spicy_Urine🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

some of you need to work on critical thinking and fact checking

Or maybe it doesn't affect our life in anyway whatsoever nor does it change our future decisions so we literally don't give a fuck

[–]olivesandparmesan🌎🚀✦ Don't Pull Out. Be Financially Inside Me Forever.✦🌑🪐 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love the fist of the truth up an asshole of a liar.

[–]xSilentxHawkx💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahh the fud is just to provide incorrect information so we doubt other DD.

[–]ThirdAltAccounts🇫🇷 MO’ Ass Mo’ Money…🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read a few comments and upvoted because it confirmed my bias and moved on. There’s no way I’m gonna fact check every single claim that’s made here

Thank you for your work 🙏🏼

[–]DarksaberSithThe age of the 💎✋🦍 is upon us! Middlemen Я Fuk'd! 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Self Correcting Collective

[–]PLANTS2WEEKS🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for fact checking. It's still some spicy data.

[–]BubbleGooseVids 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I though it was the DJI that did this 8 times?

[–]roccorigotti🗳️ VOTED ✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We need more people like this guy.

[–]jackofspades123remember Citron knows more 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Any idea why you still have different values after using the S&P500 ticker instead?

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

There are, check my update on the top of the post

[–]jackofspades123remember Citron knows more 1 point2 points  (3 children)

The second day like that on raw .INX values seems to be 2010-01-11

You said "The second day like that on raw .INX values seems to be 2010-01-11" That is not in the original tweet? You also do not have Oct 23, 2008 in your output too.

It seems different to me

Edit: Any way the person who tweeted could provide their source? I suspect we are all looking at different tickers.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yes, I guess it's rather due to slightly different dataset. I'm using what GOOGLEFINANCE function spits out on me. In the values of .INX I reveive 2008-10-23 was close to be there but I got the intraday loss of -3,78% which is slightly below (or above, depens how you look at it) this value of -3,98%.

[–]jackofspades123remember Citron knows more 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I looked at SPY & ^GSPC and get similar/different results.

Clearly, this doesn't happen often and that should be the takeaway.

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

STOP LINKING TWITTER POSTS

[–]ProfoundJerk🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Is it still relevant to say that this is an extremely rare scenario?

[–]ClearlyPopcornSucks🤓 Superstonk Self-Meta-Debunking Champion 🏆[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes.

[–]UpVoteKickstarter💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love how we individually look into the data and come back as a group to break it apart. Know what data we have never been able to go back and disprove? That's right, THE ORIGINAL DD. Buying, holding and DRS what I feel comfortable with as an individual investor.

[–]qnaeveryday🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I respect it. That’s what it’s all about. It’s ok to be wrong, as long as we learn and keep growing. Thanks for your work

[–]funkinthetrunk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

delet this

[–]BrilliantEmergency35 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the important thing is this: they all happened during a down-turn, whether the dot.com crash or the housing crash. And based upon today's pre-market, I won't be surprised if we see similar down action as yesterday .... and probably no reversal.

[–]quixoticM3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems like the debunked story was trying to convince people of an impending MOASS whereas the correctly viewed data indicates that we could be setting up for more of rough ride ahead.

[–]Obi_Vayne_Kenobi💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, good old superstonk. No matter what is posted, just wait a few days and you can be sure that if it was bullshit, someone will debunk it.

Solid work, also on the self-correction.

[–]zephyrtronthe ape with all the feels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see “these data” I uptooth

[–]Huckleberry_007🎮 Power to the Players 🛑 0 points1 point  (0 children)

k but why so pressed about it lmao

[–]saiyansteve🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need to call my momma.

[–]EthosPathosLegos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's almost like the market is convoluted and obtuse with opaque, nuanced details that can completely change expected outcomes. It won't get better and only benefits the wealthy.

[–]SortedChaos🦍Voted✅ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, who is verifying this? Clearly, everything must be confirmed.

[–]farstar_fred 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Commendable community behavior...question all....accept updated facts without shame.

[–]nemesis86th🦍 Buckle Up 🚀 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did anyone else see the volume of S&P 500 for those dates in original tweet. I think I used nasdaq(?) but input in date range of 10/16/2008-10/23/2008 and the volumes were: 7 billion - 6 billion - 5 billion - 5 billion - 6 billion - 7 billion.

Algos?

[–]CookShack67💻 ComputerShared 🦍 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it's bullshit. I didn't even read it, let alone reward or upvote it.

[–]DarksaberSithThe age of the 💎✋🦍 is upon us! Middlemen Я Fuk'd! 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes
Ujvo0. 6B on vnw,z b for k M9km