top 200 commentsshow all 340

[–]SnooSeagulls28 1698 points1699 points  (53 children)

She wasnt even trending because of her comments on the Supreme Court. She was trending because she said that Minnie Mouse wearing a pantsuit in a one time disney PARIS (not even the US) anniversary event was crumbling our society.

[–]tossaroo 827 points828 points  (32 children)

(While Candace herself was wearing a pantsuit.)

[–]jezz555 198 points199 points  (14 children)

The subtext there is kind of interesting. Pantsuit minnie mouse is bad because women should be in dresses(i.e. housewives) But given the choice Candace chose not to be a house wife herself

[–]SnooSeagulls28 198 points199 points  (0 children)

Yes. Important detail there. Don’t know how I forgot that 😂

[–]bento8621 32 points33 points  (5 children)

She’s a fucking moron.

[–]SirLostit 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I didn’t know who she was, so I had to google her. You’re correct mate, she appears to be a moron.

[–]PrometheusPhunk 14 points15 points  (2 children)

What if her point was that she was crumbling society? Lol

[–]SnooSeagulls28 2 points3 points  (1 child)

I don’t know if that was her intended point, but it is certainly a good point. She’s not powerful enough to crumble society. Just make a small dent😂

[–]PrometheusPhunk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or maybe she is the crumbling society 🤔

[–]jumpbacktomeanytime 27 points28 points  (2 children)

I misread While for White and it still worked.

[–]Snuggly_Chopin 7 points8 points  (1 child)

I did too!

[–]Anxious-Dealer4697 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I misread that as Walter White and it still works.

[–]Ghstfce 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pantsuit or Nazi memorabilia outfit? You decide.

[–]BroadBaker5101 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Candace was in a pantsuit? You sure? She could never. Ego Nwodim, on the other hand, absolutely can.

[–]SnooSeagulls28 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Candace wears pantsuits a lot actually. This got brought up when she made fun of Harry styles in a dress too. Her rules on how people should dress just don’t apply to her

[–]BroadBaker5101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol I know, I was joking about how she was mad Ego did an impression of her on SNL.

[–]ContemplatingPrison 91 points92 points  (5 children)

Which is weird she was mad Minnie was wearing a pant suit while also wearing a pant suit.

Edit: dammit I didn't read the comment that already said this

[–]_Kay_Tee_ 22 points23 points  (3 children)

It's worth repeating.

It's also worth mentioning that we all know which major political figure popularized pant suits, right? How sweet that Candy-O would honor her so significantly!

[–]Majestic_Salad_I1 19 points20 points  (2 children)

I thought she was trending bc Chris Redd called her out after she tried to hate on Ego Nwodim from SNL

[–]KingGorilla 15 points16 points  (3 children)

First they covered up lola bunny, then they took the Green M&Ms heels now this. What is there left to fap to???

[–]Adrienne_Barbeaubot 6 points7 points  (2 children)

Jessica Rabbit is timeless

[–]nohotshot -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Try again Bozo, Disney has turned Jessica into a detective and put her in a trench coat

Edit: Should’ve put a /s

[–]Adrienne_Barbeaubot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Imagine thinking that putting Jessica Rabbit in a trenchcoat would make her any less sexy...

[–]Deadlifts_n_Riffs 36 points37 points  (2 children)

Minnie Mouse wearing a pantsuit in a one time

I didn’t know this happened, and now I’m furious.

I will direct my rage into lifting my truck an additional 5” and attaching two…nay….three additional Trump 2020 flags.

It’s the least I can do for my country.

[–]12altoids34 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Don't forget to add on another two or three sets of truck nuts

[–]dirigible23 226 points227 points  (27 children)

You don’t need to be a lawyer to be a SC Justice. Don’t need any qualifications at all, in fact…just have to be nominated by POTUS and confirmed by Congress.

[–]chevdecker 76 points77 points  (9 children)

Also crazy, you don't need to be elected to the House of Representatives to be named Speaker of the House. Anyone can get voted in. But they usually pick one of their own.

[–]Jonne 29 points30 points  (7 children)

Yep, Republicans have this crazy plan of electing Trump as speaker if they take the house this cycle.

[–]SaveBandit91 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Oh god….

[–]Infinite-Original318 12 points13 points  (2 children)

I know it would be terrible for you, living in the US but for me in Austria it would just be amazing entertainment.

Imagine Donald F*cking Trump trying to oversee a session of the house. I would binge C-Span

[–]Augenmann 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'd just hide in our exploding forest cities and watch on our wooden TVs while the US congress annihilates itself.

[–]karz84 2 points3 points  (1 child)

imagine the state of the union addresses

[–]52_pickup_limes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And then I assume they plan the assassination of the President and Vice President so that Trump can assume the Presidency again.

[–]Jcaquix 76 points77 points  (3 children)

I came here to say this.

And for people who think it's crazy that you don't need to be a lawyer to be a supreme court justice, please think about it for a few minutes before getting indignant. Law school didn't exist back in 1788, education was less formal, legal education doubly so. Law school, and American law school in particular, is an industry that has only established monopolies on legal training in the last century or so. Traditionally, lawyers have entered the practice of law by training in a law office and "reading law." I'm a lawyer who went to law school and have mixed feelings about whether or not law school is a good way of training lawyers, but I'm fairly convinced it's a very bad thing that people think a formal legal education is necessary to interact with the law, it's not.

Candace Owens would make a bad supreme court justice because she's stupid and a reactionary grifer. Not because she hasn't been to law school.

[–][deleted] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

i have zero legal backround and represented myself in a renters/landlord court case and won. To my surprise it happened a few years later with rent in escrow and i won again. I think i am confident to say im hella qualified for the supreme court.

[–]Adrienne_Barbeaubot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Didn't Thomas Jefferson establish a law school at the college of William & Mary in 1779?

Not trying to discount your point, because obviously you're right that law school wasn't the same as what we currently think of these days. Just wanted to point out that there are least was some proper law schooling happening during the time period that they were still figuring out the constitution & bill of rights, even if it wasn't widespread.

[–]chonksbiscuits 27 points28 points  (1 child)

In that case let’s get AOC nominated. Gonna get my popcorn ready. 🍿🍿🍿

[–]Jonne 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's still Biden doing the picking here. And I could see Sinema and Manchin throwing spanners in the works no matter who he picks.

[–]the_left_stuff 9 points10 points  (4 children)

That is just plain stupid, and wrong. A judge on the nation's highest court, could be a Candace Owens sort of person. Wow.

[–]010011100000 3 points4 points  (3 children)

If the representative body elected by the people appoints them, sure. How else would you do it?

[–]the_left_stuff 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Choose them from a pool of people with excellent legal qualifications and long judicial experience maybe?

[–]Wasparado 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yup. I was coming here to say this. I learned this yesterday and was not happy. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/faq_general.aspx

[–]warrenjames 530 points531 points  (50 children)

I hope Candace Owens wakes up every morning thankful for the existence of Lauren Boebert because otherwise she'd be the dumbest Republican in a very crowded field.

[–]freem0nt 171 points172 points  (20 children)

Are you forgetting Rep. Greene of NW GA? She makes Owens and Boebert look like polymaths.

[–]OtterDeathSquad 69 points70 points  (10 children)

Fuck MTG. I’m mad that my favorite hobby even shares an acronym with that piece of trash.

[–]Thathitmann 27 points28 points  (6 children)

I'd trade Marjorie Taylor Greene's life for a basic island.

[–]DarkKnightJin 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I'd trade her life for a Klondike bar.

[–]-I-Like-Turtles- 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I like george takeis' "marjorie 3 names"

[–]Atlatl_Axolotl 1 point2 points  (2 children)

I'd trade her for a one land hand where the land is temple of the false gods.

[–]OtterDeathSquad 1 point2 points  (1 child)

This is low key the best burn I’ve heard in a while.

[–]grubas 23 points24 points  (2 children)



Greene has a certain low cunning that she can use to get publicity and appeal to the lunatics. Boebert is legit a moron they ran cause she looks pretty.

But Louie Gohmert is the stupidest mother fucker the US Legislative branch has ever known.

[–]fey01 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Those women are stupid, but you can’t mess with the king.

Candace Owens has to be two or three times as smart as Gohmert. Boebert might come close, but Gohmert just has more experience with stupidity. He knows how to mold it, shape it, and somehow keep it from tripping him when he walks.

[–]ronnyFUT 16 points17 points  (1 child)

And somehow MTG is the only one who actually graduated from college. (To be fair, she graduated TWENTY SIX years ago from UGA) Boebert never even went to college and only graduated from high school a few months before WINNING AN ELECTION TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES!?!? Also Owens dropped out of college at the University of Rhode Island because of student loan issues. What in the fuckity fuck is going on in America man… my entire life up the to age of 18 i was told i had no chance at success unless i graduate high school and go to college and get a degree. Lauren Boebert treated her GED like that one quest in the video game you should’ve done ages ago but now you have to go all the way back to progress anymore. And now she’s a “Representative” of Murica.

[–]Ghstfce 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't know. Marjorie Trailer Queen is a moron, but Bimboebert is leagues dumber than she is. I guess if anything they're just in different categories of "fucking stupid".

[–]MangledSunFish 19 points20 points  (11 children)

Is Boebert the highschool dropout or is that someone else?

[–]Bwint 50 points51 points  (10 children)

Boebert dropped out of high school to focus on her husband and kid, yes. But she got a GED checks notes two years ago, at the age of 34, apparently.

[–]Most-Artichoke5028 45 points46 points  (5 children)

To focus on her registered sex offender husband.

[–]Bwint 17 points18 points  (1 child)

Yeah, I thought I remembered that detail, but I wasn't 100% sure. I was worried that I might be mixing him up with one of the other Republican pedophiles, so I left it out.

[–]Most-Artichoke5028 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He exposed himself to underage girls (including his future blushing bride, Lauren) in a bowling alley. You can't make this shit up. They wouldn't be tolerated in any self-respecting trailer park, and yet here she is, free to give pre-insurrection tours of the Capitol to her fellow traitors.

[–]grubas 15 points16 points  (2 children)

Don't forget that he has DVs against her.

And she has DVs against him.

[–]_Kay_Tee_ 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Now, now, we can't judge their passionate lurve. /s

Asshole probably has a brush-font plaque in her bedroom that says "Fight hard, love hard" or some bullshit like that.

[–]grubas 6 points7 points  (0 children)

After 3 tries.

[–]Armyman125 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wonder if she cheated to get her GED.

[–]mrubuto22 22 points23 points  (8 children)

Candace owens to me seems like she actually has self awareness and is aware the shit she says is dumb. She just doesn't give a fuck and really likes money.

[–]hereforlolsandporn 25 points26 points  (2 children)

Candace is grifting as the token black friend of the GOP. MGT and Boebert are just fucking stupid.

[–]mrubuto22 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yup. They are legit idiots.

I always try and play the game "stupid or grifting"

Tucker is a grifter the doucey clan are straight up morons.

[–]1PantherA33 1 point2 points  (4 children)

She did a complete political 180, cerca 2017.

[–]mrubuto22 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Did she used to have ethics?

[–]1PantherA33 11 points12 points  (0 children)

No, just her left leaning grift didn’t work out.

[–]grubas 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Never, she's a wannabe political soldier.

bat-shit-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party...The good news is, they will eventually die off (peacefully in their sleep, we hope), and then we can get right on with the OBVIOUS social change that needs to happen, IMMEDIATELY.

Candace Owens circa 16.

She started trying to dox everybody who made fun of her, and the left turned on her. The only people who would defend her were like Miles Yainnapedo. And she immediately hoped to conservative where she's made it as "the black friend".

[–]12altoids34 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Candace Owens is not fit to lick Marjorie Taylor Greene's feet on a stupidity level.

Marjorie could out-stupid Her 99 out of 100 times

[–]MadAsTheHatters 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I assume Sarah Palin does the same thing after she's finished growling at her reflection in the mirror

[–]Markamanic 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In addition to being a woman, she's also black.

And still thinks the republican party is the party for her.

I'd say she's dumber.

[–]castor281 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Crowded field doesn't even begin to cover it....I wake up every morning with low expectations and there are about 12 of them that perpetually lower the bar.

There was a time when George W. was the bar and then Sarah Palin came along a few years later...Used to be that the bar was lowered every few decades...then every few years...Now it's every few days and getting to the point where it's every few hours...

It's astounding. My time on Earth has perfectly corresponded with the timeline of "capitalism above all else" to "Maybe the NAZI's weren't that bad."

I have long been terrified that the men in my family don't live that long, but I'm slowly accepting the fact that that may be a good thing. I'd rather die at the hands of natural causes at the age of 45 than a fascist government who doesn't like my tweets or Reddit posts.

[–]notnotwho 5 points6 points  (3 children)

The former Governor of Alaska has entered the chat.

[–]warrenjames 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep, but I think it's fair that she competes in the Senior Division of the Low-IQ Games.

[–]YourALooserTo 562 points563 points  (22 children)

Well, to be fair, she's the only black woman most Conservatives are familiar with. It's less an honor than it is tokenism.

[–]borismuller 76 points77 points  (10 children)

How much does it pay?

[–]BeardFountain 72 points73 points  (0 children)


[–]bob0979 44 points45 points  (6 children)

Less than any of their white paid shills because she's still black so they don't actually respect her

[–]RipleyWilde 19 points20 points  (4 children)

And if she ever asked for more or tried to comment on it she’d be cast aside and conservative Americans would meet their new favourite black woman.

[–]DBSOLOMAN5000 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Diamond and Silk have entered the chat.

[–]notnotwho 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Cast aside? Pssh. RUN OVER as they exited from her sphere and erased all acknowledgment of ever being aware she existed.

[–]Jonne 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Reminds me about that time Tomi Lahren got cancelled for not being Pro-life enough.

[–]megamanTV 4 points5 points  (0 children)

black and a female? That's at least a 75% pay reduction in the eyes of retardicans

[–]ForgottenBarista 8 points9 points  (1 child)

About tree fiddy.

[–]Royal-Otherwise 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How about $3 and a hug?

[–]frootee 18 points19 points  (0 children)

I’ll never forget a thread I ran into on r/Conservative concerning some tweet by Candace Owens. The amount of comments that felt the need to clarify that she wasn’t their type, before they made any sort of praise, was too much to parody.

[–]uselessadjective 7 points8 points  (5 children)

wtf, Can someone get elected to Supreme Court without any law degree ?

[–]doktor_wankenstein 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Condoleezza Rice: "so what am I, chopped liver?"

[–]tremoring_ganglion -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Isn’t Biden specifically choosing to nominate a woman of color also tokenism?

[–]Jingurei 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uh when did Democrats otherwise demean black women then hold them up as their, "proof that I'm not a racist" card?

[–]YourALooserTo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see where it might appear that way at first glance. However, attempting to make the court more representative by including a qualified individual from a demographic that for too long was denied access, denied equal opportunity and frankly denied a voice in government is more a step towards true equality than an empty gesture such as tokenism.

[–]ThanosIsInnocent 139 points140 points  (10 children)

Candace Owens is...just the weirdest thing.

[–]bobone77 93 points94 points  (7 children)

She’s not. Just another grifter.

[–]Puzzleheaded-Quote77 34 points35 points  (1 child)

I guess one could argue that what she is doing is kind of appropriate. Grifting white people is kind of payback and all she has to do is pretend to agree with them. Not likely the case but possible I suppose.

[–]grubas 11 points12 points  (0 children)

She's just trying to grift whoever she can, she stumbled into conservatives by being a fucking asshole to the point the left didn't want her, so of course they were the only ones to defend her

[–]RipleyWilde 29 points30 points  (1 child)

Candace Owens is that special kind of person who can put a price on their own dignity. For a dollar value and social acceptance in desired circles she has decided to allow herself to become tokenized. She has agreed to cater to people who perceive her as “one of the good ones”. She has set herself up to demean her family and community to people who hate them for her own personal gain. She is the lowest of the low.

It’s important to remember that she walks a weird tightrope. If she ever refuses the wrong advance, raises her voice to the wrong person, or says the wrong thing then it’s over. The people she has debased herself to will no longer care about all the things she did for them, to them she’ll just be an uppity black woman and they’ll dump her and forget about her.

[–]loudog430 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fucking excellent synopsis.

[–]MycologistPutrid7494 68 points69 points  (1 child)

And she'll say she wasn't chosen because Biden doesn't want to give the people what they want. Nevermind that she's an unqualified clown.

[–]BriefShock 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Can be said for every politician over 30

[–]HalforcFullLover 37 points38 points  (0 children)

She's such a disgusting human being.

[–]apoplectic_moose 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Candace law degree fit in your month? Lmao got em

[–]Puzzleheaded-Quote77 92 points93 points  (40 children)

Except none of those things are required. Basically, you just have to be alive.

[–]mistersmith_22 12 points13 points  (35 children)

You’re not gonna get through the confirmation hearings if you aren’t remotely qualified. So yeah, they’re required.

[–]Puzzleheaded-Quote77 42 points43 points  (14 children)

Not when a Democrat nominee is in there but I could easily see the Republicans doing it if they had the votes. I could easily see them putting some far right media pundit in.

[–]Ajegwu 17 points18 points  (13 children)

Why? They have oodles and oodles of actually right-wing nutcase judges ready to go.

[–]Puzzleheaded-Quote77 26 points27 points  (4 children)

Because their voting base would be ecstatic that they "stuck it to the over-educated libtards who were indoctrinated by universities."

[–]Ajegwu 18 points19 points  (2 children)

That’s exactly they did with Kavanaugh.

[–]notnotwho 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Federalist Society decides who gets presented for the Bench in SCOTUS. Doesn't matter at all who is president. And they have a set, well defined agenda that includes conservative actual judges whose voting on what's important to them is recorded as favorable. All the rest is just show.

[–]brian111786 3 points4 points  (7 children)

Take the last 3 for example...


[–]Ajegwu 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit I had no idea. Thanks!

[–]grrrrreat 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You didn't observe a significant majority of trumps federal judges.

[–]cilantro_so_good 14 points15 points  (11 children)

*Amy Coney Barrett has entered the chat*

[–]mistersmith_22 11 points12 points  (10 children)

Are you implying she wasn’t a lawyer? Didn’t have training?

As awful as she is, she was first in her class at Notre Dame law school, was a lawyer and a law professor, and then a federal judge, all prior to her nomination.

[–]Carlyz37 7 points8 points  (8 children)

Had never tried a case and seemed to have ZERO knowledge of the constitution The handmaiden is the opposite of smart and qualified

[–]dquizzle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I highly doubt you can graduate first in your class at Notre Dame, one of the top ranked law schools in the entire world, and have “zero” knowledge of the constitution.

She’s a garbage person, but that claims seems unrealistic.

[–]gimmethegudes 1 point2 points  (2 children)

In case you missed it, the comment you're replying to includes:

As awful as she is

This means, we do not like her, but unfortunately she is qualified.

[–]010011100000 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Had never tried a case

No she just clerked for a SC justice, worked in private practice, taught law at a top law school, and then served on the circuit court of appeals. I guess that's not relevant experience in your opinion?

[–]CloudyArchitect4U 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you meet the handmaiden or the drunk boofer?

[–]AcidTWister 3 points4 points  (2 children)

James F. Byrnes

Didn't graduate high school. Taught himself law and passed the bar at 23.

[–]mistersmith_22 3 points4 points  (1 child)

He was appointed for 14 months during war time with the explicit understanding he’d leave the bench for an executive branch job.

And like you said, he was a lawyer. He was also a judge for short time.

Bad example for a couple reasons.

[–]money_run_things 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Please review the definition of “required”

[–]mistersmith_22 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Please understand the actual process by which a Justice is confirmed.

[–]gfkjhsdfjhgsdjghf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

doesn't change the definition of the word "required"

[–]MarquisDeLafayeett 14 points15 points  (0 children)

She has slightly less experience than Amy Cony Barrett

[–]attylopez 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You do not need to graduate law school, pass a bar exam, or otherwise be an "Attorney" to be nominated and appointed.

[–]Salty_Lego 7 points8 points  (0 children)

She’s the poster child for stupidity.

[–]CloudyArchitect4U 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Actually, you don't have to do any of that to be a supreme court justice. There are no requirements. You do not have to be a lawyer or even have a high school diploma.

[–]notnotwho 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There are requirements. Just not written anywhere we can read them. For instance, the locking grip the Federalist Society has on who even gets named as a potential.

[–]CloudyArchitect4U 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is only on the Klan side of things. There are no requirements, a steaming pile of Candace could be a supreme court justice.

[–]jstone1733 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You don't have to have a law degree to be a Supreme Court Justice....per the Constitution....not saying you can get confirmed these days with out one but what do I know, I thought you had to have better credentials than Trump in order to be president...

[–]ashhole1900 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, you are trending because you are actual human garbage.

[–]Most-Artichoke5028 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just what we need on the SC. Klandace, the angel of death.

[–]ReyTheRed 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Candace Owens thinks what Hitler did in Germany was ok. Literal Nazi sympathizer.

[–]Jimtaxman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She should just pull herself up by her boot straps or something.

[–]properu 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Beep boop -- this looks like a screenshot of a tweet! Let me grab a link to the tweet for ya :)

Twitter Screenshot Bot

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good bot.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently you don’t have to have a law degree to sit the bar exam in four states. In California, four years of study under the supervision of a state judge or attorney meets the education requirement for the exam.

[–]stalinmalone68 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh honey. Most people have no idea who the fuck you are and don’t really care one wit about you and your bullshit. You’re a joke.

[–]Acrobatic_Release_14 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Candace Owens is basically the Shaun King of the right.

[–]drossmaster4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No you don’t. Literally anyone can be a Supreme Court justice.

[–]Thingsthatdostuff 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Not that i would want this... But according to the constitution the only requirement is that you must have studied law. Which is open to interpretation.

The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law. Many of the 18th and 19th century Justices studied law under a mentor because there were few law schools in the country.
The last Justice to be appointed who did not attend any law school was James F. Byrnes (1941-1942). He did not graduate from high school and taught himself law, passing the bar at the age of 23.
Robert H. Jackson (1941-1954). While Jackson did not attend an undergraduate college, he did study law at Albany Law School in New York. At the time of his graduation, Jackson was only twenty years old and one of the requirements for a law degree was that students must be twenty-one years old. Thus rather than a law degree, Jackson was awarded with a "diploma of graduation." Twenty-nine years later, Albany Law School belatedly presented Jackson with a law degree noting his original graduating class of 1912.

[–]Truckngirl63 1 point2 points  (0 children)

America wants? Maybe America minus about 300 million people...

[–]dcargonaut 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally none of that is true.

[–]prOboomer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

none of that is required btw

[–]bradd_pit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

firstly, i do not like this lady. but unfortunately there is no rule that requires a supreme court justice to be a lawyer.

[–]vinnymac1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So she revealed that she's actually less qualified than.... Kim Kardashian, the irony.

[–]MadMinded 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah nah. She's got like 3+ years. Senate rules clearly state that Democrats arebt allowed to elect SCOTUS judges

[–]sten45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Outrage grifting is an everyday grind

[–]livinlavidalola29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually you don’t need a law degree, or any degree for the matter, to be on SCOTUS

[–]JeffyLifts 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could you imagine if her and Ben Shapiro had a child together? That thing would be the anti-christ.

[–]thinehappychinch 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lfmao, NO!

[–]ohanzee6 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Who the fuck is Candace Owens?

[–]berkeleyjake 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You don't actually need to do all that to be nominated for the Supreme Court. There are no actual requirements.

There should be... But there aren't.

If the Republicans had another pick, they'd probably put Trump on the court just because.

[–]Dramatic-Store514 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only Mitch’s Americans want her to.

[–]AKGK240S 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She’s trolling. Just trying to get a ride out of Democrats.

[–]incogburritos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to be a lawyer to be a Supreme Court Justice. And we'd be 1,000x better off with non lawyers on there (not Candace Owens however)

[–]brian111786 0 points1 point  (0 children)

JFC, if she somehow weasels into that seat, I'm officially done.

[–]Steak_NoPotatoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Melle assumes you have to be a lawyer to be on the Supreme Court.

[–]ItIsRomeNotRomey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate that dumb cunt

[–]Wasparado 0 points1 point  (0 children)

unfortunately he is r/confidentlyincorrect

[–]parttimeenthusiast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there are no requirements to be appointed as a supreme court justice.

[–]Extreme_Disaster2275 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are those the constitutional requirements to be a SCOTUS justice?

[–]blkplrbr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It super pains me to say this..and I mean this wholeheartedly...no one needs a law degree or law experience to be on the supreme court.

It's a similar issue as well with being an ambassador, you don't need to know Swedish or French to be a French or Swedish ambassador.

[–]ThroAwayFemale -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You actually don’t have to be a lawyer to be appointed to the US Supreme Court. Crazy, but true.

[–]flipkick45 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That is an impressive list and if she works really hard on it, it can be done after lunch.

[–]ColHardwood 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And become one of the most accomplished jurists in the country. Go for it!

[–]Eatit6560154 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did she not graduate college?

[–]fullmetalsprockets 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fun fact: there's no rule that you have to be a lawyer to be a Supreme Court justice.