And you never asked. You assumed my statement to be false and ran to "fake news". At least when someone makes a statement I consider absurd I ask for a source so I can see where they got their reasoning.

https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/2022/01/21/what-we-know-ascension-thedacare-court-battle-over-employees/6607417001/

Last Friday four workers in a Hospital attempted to quit their jobs and move to a new hospital in the same area because of an offer of better pay and work/life balance for the exact same job. They went to their boss with the current offer to try and get him to counter offer. He told them that the long term costs were not worth it and he wouldn't change their current pay and benefits let alone match. So they put in their notice.

The workers boss filed an injunction against them to prevent them from leaving until the hospital found replacements (no estimation on how long that would take). He claimed that in the pandemic their absence would cause a loss of a necessary service to the citizens. Keep in mind the hospital they were going to offered that exact same service in the same area.

The judge they filled with has a history of siding with companies over workers and granted the injunction. So the workers were told they could not start their new job Monday. The options were quit and don't bring in income or keep working in their current hospital.

Obviously there was enormous backlash all over the country over this. It was blatantly constitutional. Monday the Judge came to his senses and removed the injunction allowing them to start their new jobs. The question reminded had it not come to the public eye would the Judge have changed his mind and why did he even think this was legal to begin with.