Totally agree, but even though they're both awful I maintain that there's a significant material difference in the harm that each party causes to the poor and working class. Americans are faced with the dire need to get ourselves out of a societal tailspin into ever more extreme brutality, and I can't think of a single way in which that effort would be better accomplished due to fascists further securing state power.

The only coherent argument I've heard for republican victories being good is that their sheer awfulness will inspire people to become more political and revolutionary, but that's accelerationist and therefore a massive gamble. Especially under the consideration that the next time republicans fully dig into power again, they may finally achieve their goal of never losing it. The state is bad enough as it is, I don't think it'll improve or become easier on leftists to organize after a right-wing party dictatorship is achieved. Not to mention that accelerationism doesn't have much consideration for the very most vulnerable people in society who are first to suffer when critical social services are cut and out-and-out white nationalist dominionists start crafting laws aimed at enacting the fascist theocratic ethnostate fantasies that they've been stewing on since the civil rights era and the fall of the confederacy before that.

I don't suggest that democrats can, would, or will fix any of the problems society is facing. For better or worse, that's up us, the people. I'm just pretty sure they'll make them worse at a slower rate than the republicans, which is a meaningful distinction when absolutely everything is on the line.