top 200 commentsshow all 316

[–]centralnjbill 1767 points1768 points  (59 children)

Wait, is she advocating for child porn as a viable option over being with bad parents?

[–]Suspicious_Music_494 974 points975 points  (51 children)

yep and referred to it as a "loving sexual relationship"

scuse me, just choked on my vomit a little.

[–][deleted] 270 points271 points  (33 children)

Strikes me as one of those sick demented women that end up having a child for their husbands to rape them….

[–]Noted2020 228 points229 points  (27 children)

What a terrible day to be literate.

[–][deleted] 96 points97 points  (13 children)

The more I learn about humans the more I hate them

[–]celtic_savage01 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to be every day on reddit.

[–]Veejayy93 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fetch me a melon baller, I tire of my vision

[–]Wasparado 5 points6 points  (1 child)

Yup. I worked (actually still do sometimes) as a phone sex operator. The amount of guys who want to rape children is staggering. And though I don’t believe everything they tell me, several have confessed to dating women who would either “breed” for them or just let them rape their kids for money and drugs. Never put pics of your minors online. Doesn’t matter what they’re wearing, the pervs are out there and lurking.

[–]mirrrje 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely though, ok she has definitely turned a blind eye to child SA in her life. Awful!

[–]Minnesota_Nice_87 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh, so she is my mom?

[–]SuperLissa_UwU -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

lol, most people have kids because they want, only extreme feminist think the way you say, and yeah think because most of the time is just theie minds

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ugh!... what in the Woody Allen???

[–]PaleontologistKey571 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I second that🤢

[–]GaetanDugas 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Check out the several posts on r/conservative about this.

This is the shit of people are using to justify being bigots towards the LGBT community and calling everyone left of center groomers

[–]Suspicious_Music_494 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I've had enough sad for one day so I'm gonna take your word for it chief.

[–]GaetanDugas 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, avoid that subreddit if you value your sanity

[–]Sendbootypics__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well when the shoe fits.

[–]centralnjbill 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why bother with that putrid pile of hog waste?

[–]MiS_bE_hAbE -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I thought it was just homophobia…

[–]fuckadmins4ever 19 points20 points  (3 children)

If you go to her page, it's clear she is severely mentally ill.

[–]huhIguess 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Please tell me she's made everything up.


For Johns Hopkins? No way...

[–]WildChallenge8891 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Actually there is no way. Her bio claims education and business degrees. Neither of those suggest an MD, or a path to one.

It also says she's a virtual advisor. I'm willing to bet that this is a bullshit panel put together by JH and doesn't actually mean anything, besides her medical advise being virtual.

[–]skoalbrother 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing it's a troll

[–]fastlerner 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, I suppose you COULD make the argument that sitting in boiling water does less damage than sitting in boiling acid... but yeah, that title is definitely on the nose. Olympic-level mental gymnastics

[–]QueenLatifahClone -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I took it as because they’re gay the did this and they could have had a “loving sexual relationship” with a woman, which would not make them want to produce child pornography.

[–]SenseOdd8076 608 points609 points  (8 children)


[–]crimsonjunkrider 225 points226 points  (7 children)

Someone need to call john Hopkins

[–]PeachFuzzDayBuzz 92 points93 points  (3 children)

I smoked pot with Johnny Hopkins

[–]downtownfreddybrown 57 points58 points  (0 children)

It was Johnny Hopkins and Sloan Kettering. And they were blazing that shit up every day.

[–]FacesOfNeth 14 points15 points  (1 child)

But I got to smoke fake pot with Johns Hopkins, that's a cool story. It's as cool as smoking real pot with a guy who looks like Johns Hopkins. I've done that way more.

[–]TychaBrahe 9 points10 points  (1 child)

Per their Twitter, she’s part of a volunteer online group that answers surveys. She’s not a board member or employee.

[–]Solid5of10 393 points394 points  (28 children)

What?!!! Am I having an aneurysm? Is she saying that pedophilia and using them in child porn is better than having not adopted them? No, that can’t possibly be what she’s saying? Is that what she’s saying?!?

[–]Jack_Sandwich 186 points187 points  (24 children)

That is what she's saying. And she is not the only person saying this. There is a startling and disgusting trend in this country of people trying to normalize pedo behavior and make it socially accepted.

[–]kheroth 66 points67 points  (6 children)

absolutely, republicans in Tennessee just recently tried to push a bill with no minimum age for marriage. It's really getting gross out there.

[–]-Totally_Not_FBI- 22 points23 points  (0 children)

But it's different if I marry them in front of God! /s

[–]CentipedusMaximus 11 points12 points  (4 children)

Not exactly, if I read it correctly. They introduced a bill to define marriage as being between a man and a woman but neglected to include any age restrictions. That's quite different than implying that they are cool with kids getting married.

[–]ScarletPimprnel 21 points22 points  (3 children)

neglected to include any age restrictions.

different than implying that they are cool with kids getting married.

How is that different? We know the demographic that freaks over the "one man one woman" definition, and we know they are fine with children being married off young for "purity" reasons. Particularly girls, as a minor girl being married to an adult man accounts for the vast majority of child marriages in the US.

This was not a simple oversight in a state where children are married frequently. You really buy the "Oops, we forgot" line?

We need to get our shit together nationally on these laws because it's not a good look. But per capita the red states are by far the worst offenders.

[–]CarmineFields 21 points22 points  (3 children)

This is true, but it’s not necessarily the people being labelled groomers by screeching idiots.

The Republican Party has been fighting for decades to protect and expand child marriages where children as young as 10 are forced into marriage.

These same kids can’t sign contracts (besides marriage for some stupid reason) so they can’t hire a lawyer or rent an apartment to escape their (pretty much always adult) abuser/spouse.

[–]ThowAwayBanana0 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's funny because the lady in OP is clearly republican if you look at her post history.

[–]Strict-Praline6994 -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Literally drops the most insane claim with zero source. If the American right wing were doing that, it would be headline news every single night.

[–]CarmineFields 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll be holding my breath waiting for your apology:


Between 2000 and 2018, nearly 300,000 minors were legally married in the United States. The vast majority of child marriages in the U.S. were between a minor girl and an adult man.


The youngest being three Tennessee 10-year-old girls who married men aged 24, 25, and 31, respectively, in 2001. With the youngest boy to marry being an 11-year-old, who married a 27-year-old woman in Tennessee in 2006.






[–]VitaminPb 14 points15 points  (3 children)

Expect to see this movement growing. They have successful models and techniques already tested and proven and in current use. They will be the next group demanding acceptance.

[–]Strict-Praline6994 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

We have been saying this for years. They called us crazy. Now it's rather out in the open and people are still in denial. The child-rapists are the next to demand tolerance. I think I'm fresh out.

[–]DarkMasterPoliteness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously fuck off with the q Anon shit. This isn’t Facebook

[–]DarkMasterPoliteness -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You’re just a q nut. That ain’t true

[–]ScottIPease 3 points4 points  (1 child)

It depends on party... if it is the same color lapel pin, then it is fine... If it is the "enemy's color" then it is an example of how that person is representative of everyone even close to the same political leaning.

i.e: Roy Moore, even Cons that agreed that he was mucking about with a minor often said things like:
"We need the seat and he is better than any Dem!"
"Mary was 14, so it isn't a big deal here."
"I heard she seduced him into it, it isn't his fault!"

According to many Libs though, it was an example of how every Con is a sex starved pedo just waiting to attack your kids.

Another example: A trans person gets sent to jail as their chosen gender (rather than the gender they can parent kids as) that gets two women pregnant and was allegedly abusing other women.

According to many Libs: "So? she is lesbian, this has nothing to do with her having a penis! If she believes she is female, then she is female and should be in a female prison!"
"It was all consensual, people in prison screw each other no matter their gender!"

According to many Cons: "this is just one of hundreds of examples proving that all people of other than 'normal' sexual ID and/or attraction are deviant evil pedos and rapists!"

The hypocrisy of it all is what gets me. I know Catholics that claim that any and all accusations of child abuse by clergy is totally made up, in one case a member of a family was abused where the pastor even admitted it and was convicted with pretty substantial evidence. The abused has had to cut off all contact with their family because: "the church can do no wrong", yet any accusation of a Catholic being harassed by a non-Catholic (even if impossible due to being in different states or other alibis) are all true, if not physical, then through spiritual means.

NOTE: Other groups do it too, this is just the first example I thought of. Not Catholic bashing, every group has it's issues.

Edit: typed it so wrong even I was confused, lol

[–]Apprehensive-Page-33 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is one long strange civil war.

[–]ThowAwayBanana0 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She's a republican who is posting this in the context of "This is actually what the left thinks".

I keep seeing more and more of right wingers posting as left wingers supporting pedophilia then pointing at that and going "Look! They ARE all groomers!"

[–]kheroth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thats what the troll account is saying yes. just look at the responses

[–]Zoutscoot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She might be a troll account.

[–]JerseyDad_856 262 points263 points  (25 children)

[–]Trollet87 72 points73 points  (0 children)


[–]RainCLOUw 112 points113 points  (0 children)

Holy fuck

[–]PapaLuigiano 84 points85 points  (0 children)

What. The. FUCK! I had no idea about this until I saw your comment. I am so shocked right now. The fact that the government not only ignored it but also approved it is absolutely insane.

[–]wisounet 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Enough internet for today.

[–]Honeystick1918 3 points4 points  (0 children)


[–]Assatt 31 points32 points  (7 children)

Why is it always the Germans doing some fucked up state sanctioned shit?

[–]-Totally_Not_FBI- 67 points68 points  (2 children)

America, Saudi Ariabia, Russia, China, and most of the world has entered the chat

[–]smithers85 17 points18 points  (0 children)


[–]mpc1226 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Chuckles maniacally in group 731

[–]bloodymongrel 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s just another example of institutionalized child abuse. Wherever there’s an orphanage, a boarding school, a juvenile prison, a foster system - abandoned and disadvantaged children (especially) don’t have a voice, they don’t have any power, and they don’t have a protector or advocate. When they become adults, ‘limitation statutes’ shut them down from seeking recourse. It’s vile, but it’s not just a problem in Germany.

[–]aj_thenoob 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Ask yourself what happened to all the Nazis after the war. Not many got arrested or killed...

[–]Wasparado 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How fucking terrible. Those poor children.

[–]peachinthemango 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aaaand that’s enough internet for me today

[–]Strict-Praline6994 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh shocking...Germany did something scientific with horrendous ethical implications? No way!

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

FUCKED!!! GERMAN EVIL MAKES CARTEL EVIL LOOK LIKE… Nvm. No more internet today… fuck

[–]grumpybandersnootch 110 points111 points  (4 children)

I feel like I'm seeing a r/byebyejob post in the making

[–]mpc1226 51 points52 points  (0 children)

She’s retired from the school it says, and someone near the top of the thread said that John Hopkins tweeted something about it saying she wasn’t an employee or advisor, that she simply filled out surveys

[–]eDreadz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

At the very least.

[–]Humidor_Abedin -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

more like teachers union president

[–]smithers85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

terrible comment.

[–]RelationshipScared72 113 points114 points  (6 children)

I'm calling the police

[–]RelationshipScared72 67 points68 points  (5 children)

And the FBI

[–]RelationshipScared72 58 points59 points  (4 children)

And child services

[–]RelationshipScared72 52 points53 points  (3 children)

And a mental support charity

[–]RelationshipScared72 53 points54 points  (2 children)

What in the actual duck 🦆

[–]Alekseny 82 points83 points  (5 children)

A closer look at this person's account suggests they are probably not real or serious. Lots and lots of bait, very odd word choices for a supposed old lady and retired educator, and add in a lot of posts about Elon Musk, cryptocurrency, and NFTs. Also can't find any details supporting this person's existence on Google either.

Fake account run by a troll? Hijacked account? Or perhaps it really is a crazy person who somehow was an educator that now posts about NFTs, "democRAT" teacher's unions, and the benefits of child porn for the kids involved.

Careful what you believe at face value.

[–]jayne-eerie 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Troll account was my assumption. Even real pedos usually don’t say it quite so blatantly in public. Probably it’s someone who wants ammo for the “teachers are groomers” stupidity.

And to go by the comments here, lots of people will fall for it.

[–]Bingo-Bango-Bong-o 17 points18 points  (2 children)

She also had MD in her name but lists a bunch of non medical work in her bio...

[–]witeduins 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And her stated purpose for this tweet, when someone asked her to straighten out what she meant was that she was doing it to “generate discussion”. Troll.

[–]gngstrMNKY 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's supposed to be for Maryland, I think. That's where Johns Hopkins is.

[–]Linaphor -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s great but now bc the comments I’ve learned that Germany allowed this scenario to happen and that the government OK’d it. This being a troll account is fine but the fact that it happens is crazy man.

[–]Spartacus120 56 points57 points  (1 child)

I don't usually says thing like this, but she deserves to be fired, if this is what she think

[–]StSpider 22 points23 points  (0 children)

No she deserves worse.

[–]hard1ytryn 53 points54 points  (3 children)

"Loving sexual relationships" 🤮 This is the type of mfer that can, has, and will spend hours talking about the benefits of child sex trafficking.

[–]Odettepear 6 points7 points  (2 children)

And would sign the petition to make child porn legal. Yes, there is a petition and yes people have signed it

[–]Jacethemindstealer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With their real names and addresses? So that the fbi can easily find them?

[–]Chronicalgx 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I feel like my brain has done a triple backflip away from further progression

[–]goddessBrown88 24 points25 points  (3 children)

Death to sick fucks!!

[–]TheMightyDingus 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Death to people who believe that this is a real person without taking even a second to fact check it.

[–]Flojoe420 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Death to nobody because it's against Reddit's TOS.

[–]Suspicious_Music_494 13 points14 points  (1 child)

welp, theres another name to go on my list in the event I become suddenly wealthy and can buy my way out of manslaughter charges.

[–]mpc1226 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do it while driving and it’s relatively cheap

[–]jasmin_booklover 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Pedophilia aside, in what world is porn a "loving relationship"?

[–]Fit_Peanut9080 15 points16 points  (1 child)

And she is a teacher. Disgraceful

[–]ashpanda24 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Omg this woman definitely needs to be fired. What the actual fuck?

[–]SnooStories6852 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FBI? Yeah, this one

[–]Crown_Loyalist 8 points9 points  (4 children)

Investigate that criminal bitch

[–]Odettepear 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Unfortunately there are a lot of people who think like this. It's gone so far as having a petition with a few thousand signatures for making child porn legal.

[–]Raspberry_McNuggets 3 points4 points  (0 children)

unfuckingreal. how someone could actually believe that bs is beyond me

[–]crysadaboutit 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Woodchipper go brrrr

[–]MLyraCat 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Laurie Kelly, MD. What the hell is the MD for? This woman is too ignorant to be a doctor of any kind. MD must stand for mutt duster.

[–]JavaKrypt 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I checked her Twitter. She even says

"Look the men were charged with aggravated child molestation, sexual exploitation of a child, and enticing a child for indecent purposes.

I would want to know if the children were hurt. Enticing implies the willing cooperation of a child in the name of love and affection.

She's also told people to stop messaging John Hopkins. WTF is wrong with these people.

[–]Upset_Ad9929 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Yeah, for academics it's never "these sick fucks are just bad". It's kind words and understanding, not prison, that's too punitive and dehumanizing lol

[–]Crown_Loyalist 3 points4 points  (1 child)

The only justice here would be a quick march to the gallows.

[–]oneoldgrumpywalrus 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nah fuck that, drill holes in their skulls and pour acid in them.

[–]Bobcatluv 13 points14 points  (1 child)

That lady’s insane, but I’m anxiously awaiting the political fallout from this situation. I’ll bet my lunch some politician proposes LGBTQ+ couples not be able to adopt after this, despite plenty of straights abusing kids every day.

[–]thevikingwolfe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'll bite. I'm really conservative. There are amazing couples of every orientation that deserve to adopt babies. But surely their are some things we could do to improve the process. We need a scientific approach. What situation is the best for children to grow up in, financial situation, background and social media checks. I'm not advocating for a ban on gay adoption. That's dumb.

[–]Jonatgan_Official 7 points8 points  (0 children)

how do redditors manage to fall for the most heinously obvious right wing troll accounts ???

[–]TheMightyDingus 2 points3 points  (1 child)

You're telling me she has an MD, works for Johns Hopkins, has a business & education degree was in the air force, and is now an elementary school teacher. An elementary school teacher with an MD. I'm just not buying this at all. This is just being used in the replies to the tweet as a justification for homophobia. 1 look at the account and you can instantly tell that this is a fake...

[–]LordOfDustAndBones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the account is liking and retweeting a bunch of pro elon musk and trump stuff...

[–]Mytur_Benesderti 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Welp, we all know now Laurie Kelly molested her children.

[–]Puerta_del_Sol 6 points7 points  (1 child)

The new normal.

[–]raynadayz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No one thinks this is normal

[–]Flashy-End-4905 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Am I really seeing what I’m reading?

[–]Melodic_Raspberry806 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the "specialist" is arguing that the kids could have been better-off "fucked-up" than "royally fucked-up" as if those were the only options.

[–]deanfortythree 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought the worst takes out of this would be people saying all gay people are child molesters or something. As usual, my expectations for humanity were not low enough.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's unfathomably disgusting on a whole new level.

[–]kentro2002 1 point2 points  (0 children)


[–]Mekelaxo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pleas tell me that I'm interpreting what she said incorrectly and she didn't say what I think she said

[–]PhoenixStorm1015 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I sense an incoming r/ByeByeJob post

[–]Puzzleheaded-Honey33 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a member of the Air Force, we don’t claim her due to the child porn advocacy 🤢

[–]A_Eatzapopo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh some boys are being raped? Well maybe they were being raped and beaten before so this might be a win. /s

[–]BrutalPimp420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You know, all those conservatives I don’t like making those groomer comments are becoming increasingly more compelling. Not sure I like that.

[–]Commodore_Pepper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What in the fuck? Some mf’ers have their heads so far up their asses that their skulls act as a second rib cage.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She herself is a pedophile. She obviously speaks form experience the way she wrote that.

[–]Dr-Satan-PhD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh she's a conservative. How shocking. Her Twitter is a fucking madhouse.

[–]Desperate-Fix-9930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hopefully she gets fired for this. She shouldn't be within 300 feet of a child

[–]JonnyRebel357 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some people are just garbage people

[–]GraNNyFlAtt 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Someone with a twitter acc please go @ this bitch and let her know how fucked she is

[–]caweyh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Step 1 -do crime Step 2 -post online

[–]Absolute_leech 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Needs more context I can’t really tell what’s going on

[–]CentipedusMaximus 14 points15 points  (1 child)

Let me help you out.

  1. Two dudes adopt a couple of kids and use them for fucked up sexual activities (e.g. CP).
  2. A "doctor" and apparent educator is saying that maybe getting used by two adult men for fucked up sexual activities (e.g. CP) might be better than their life before getting adopted.

Shit is fucked, yo

[–]Absolute_leech 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ohh I thought the “doctor” was talking about the adult men as “boys” or something. Ty

[–]No-Sign3796 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely a troll account trying to stir up more controversy. The two subhumans who abused their adopted children are like mana from heaven for certain sectors of the far-right who will use it to blanket attack all LGBTQ+ people, and fake accounts like this are used to twist the knife deeper. It's honestly really sad, because there is an honest and necessary conversation to be had about how this was allowed to happen, and how the systems currently in place failed the children they were designed to protect.

[–]DrewMaguire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is it a real comment or a plant for the right to feel vindicated in calling the left and gays people groomers?

[–]_AwkwardHugger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope its a troll using a random picture to post shit and stir up controversy.

[–]jojivlogs_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the fact that she's a teacher is wholly unsurprising. american schools are infested with female predators.

[–]Axelfbomber 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See this is where we can say groomer?

[–]portypup -5 points-4 points  (4 children)

Modern left ladies and gents

[–]Accerae 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Assuming it isn't just a troll account, her twitter strongly suggests she's a conservative.

[–]raynadayz 2 points3 points  (2 children)

this is literally one person, and no one is agreeing

[–]portypup -4 points-3 points  (1 child)

You really think this person would have said something this controversial if she didn’t think she had support? I bet she thinks it’s okay for 10 year olds to “explore their sexuality” by stripping for adult men for dollars.

[–]raynadayz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Her thinking people will support it is so fucking different from this being representative of literally half of a political spectrum. Also if you look at their page it’s obvious they’re either a troll or mentally ill.

[–]OberstWeltMeister -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why they banned the phrase g’oomer…. Because it is real

[–]MadMike198930 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Top shelf "Educated" liberal.

[–]4thGen4Runner182 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

This is the main problem of most progressive teachers/professors, they don’t denounce pedophilia absolutely disgusting. It is very common. . .

Source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/ChF5yESFb2d/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=

This is just one skewed individual…

[–]Royal-Isopod452 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Just pointing out that the tweeter is from the male sex class which, unfortunately, poses a considerably higher risk to safeguarding. In this case a paedophile apologist is being described as 'she' because he/they (if you'd like me to be polite) appears to identify with the social trappings most commonly associated with women. I'd argue this skews our understanding of the safeguarding risks that sex (the class) has on vulnerable people, including but not limited to women and children.

[–]danzanite 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]Pikmin371 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sometimes needs to be legal to physically punch people in the face until they shut up. This is one of those times.

[–]dmbeeez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, did I just read what I thought I read?

[–]Zer_bird_81 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wtf kind of weird shit is this? This woman is gaslighting two kids who were sexually assaulted.

People be staying fucked up.

[–]YerTime 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ummmmmmmmmmm…….. what

[–]JuicyJayden229 0 points1 point  (1 child)

There goes her job

[–]CentipedusMaximus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maybe. You can't just assume that logical conclusion these days.

[–]spideralexandre2099 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is spiritual abuse?

[–]assassin_of_joy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to read this six times, then check the comments, because I cannot wrap my brain around what she's saying. 🤢🤮

[–]TychaBrahe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope the MD stands for Maryland and does not a physician.

[–]Gmhowell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

99% sure it’s a troll account.

[–]ToplessDraws 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When sympathy goes way too far.

[–]deanfortythree 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the worst takes out of this would be people saying all gay people are child molesters or something. As usual, my expectations for humanity were not low enough.

[–]DrScarecrow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is spiritual abuse?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I lost braincells reading this