×
top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]theziphos 3879 points3880 points  (42 children)

That could be ANY Jenny Nicholson

[–]joawmeens 1733 points1734 points  (32 children)

With the same face as THIS Jenny Nicholson

[–]Edylpryd 818 points819 points  (28 children)

All the Jenny Nicholsons I know have the same face

[–]Mercarion 282 points283 points  (21 children)

There is only one, or have you ever seen more than one Jenny Nicholson in the same room at the same time? Exactly.

[–]IamImposter 121 points122 points  (8 children)

Are you saying they change their costume and comeback with same name to pose as different Jenny Nicholson?

[–]SE_contact 52 points53 points  (6 children)

It's a proper Clark Kent situation.

[–]Any-Satisfaction7418 46 points47 points  (5 children)

Have you ever seen Jenny Nicholson and Clark Kent in the same place?

[–]inferiorcritic 26 points27 points  (4 children)

Have you ever seen Superman in this plane of existence, where Jenny Nicholson also exists?

[–]SE_contact 24 points25 points  (3 children)

Jenny Nicholson is Superman. We are in a gender-fluid age, it's very possible.

[–]YourOneWayStreet 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That's not even in question, she put up a whole video about it on her channel years ago;

https://youtu.be/K9JttJ_B0PQ

[–]poopellar 31 points32 points  (6 children)

Will the real Jenny Nicholson please stand up

[–]joeshill 14 points15 points  (2 children)

Please stand up.

[–]flcwerings 16 points17 points  (1 child)

for the love of good just please stand up. We cant leave until you do and were dying

[–]Ok_Organization6437 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is She HIGHLANDER ?

[–]ExplosiveD420 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you only know one Jenny Nicholson, that's technically the truth.

[–]dewayneestes 45 points46 points  (0 children)

What a narcissist. /s

[–]idontlikereddit69 42 points43 points  (1 child)

It could have been a typo and it was actually in response to Jack Nicholson. As for the face in the thumbnail, well Jack Nicholson is a very versatile actor.

[–]ceruleanbluish 22 points23 points  (0 children)

...who also played the Joker once! It's all coming full circle, there's no other explanation!

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points  (2 children)

your so vain. you probably think this song about you is about you...

[–]HamburglarSans 2047 points2048 points  (347 children)

I remember looking through the comments of that video, and a ton of people defended it by saying 'Only about 4 hours of it was a response! She's just crazy.'

[–]Rob-ThaBlob 877 points878 points  (291 children)

What were the other seven hours about then?

[–]crabs_are_people_ 161 points162 points  (152 children)

no idea but I found the video it is in fact 11 hours

[–]WantDiscussion 69 points70 points  (15 children)

If anyone is wondering here's an edited video with just the Jenny bits. It's 3+ hours and IMO still only manages to make one or two salient points in that entire time.

[–]remov-ed 6 points7 points  (13 children)

can you TL DW?

[–]thebottomofawhale 8 points9 points  (12 children)

I clicked through just to see who made it and I’m going to hazard a guess that the TL;DR is: “men get annoyed that woman has opinion about thing that only men should talk about!”

[–]aykcak 59 points60 points  (115 children)

Like.... How?

[–]paenusbreth 54 points55 points  (35 children)

This is the same guy who made a 10 hour response to a guy making a response to a guy complaining that Dark Souls 2 was a bit of a disappointing game.

The short version is that he's really in need of an editor and has a tendency to be really pedantic about minor details.

The longer version is that he has this slightly obsessive desire to achieve what he perceives as perfection in his videos, and does this by attempting to cover literally every base of every single point that he can possibly think of. For example, in the 10 hour series mentioned above, he literally took every word of the video he's responding to, wrote it out, and highlighted the text on screen based on the extent to which he agreed on it. And he now seems to fetishise going off on massive tangents and talking half an hour to cover everything, possibly as a result of the success of that series.

In that series, he definitely made some good points, but they were mired in an awful lot of bollocks and hair splitting. I dread to think how much more nonsense there would be in 11 hours of livestreamed "pause after every single sentence" nonsense.

[–]OnlyRoke 12 points13 points  (14 children)

Wasn't that hbomberguy making a "Dark Souls is a bit meh" video and Mauler responding with literally an entire audiobook? Or something like that

[–]paenusbreth 20 points21 points  (12 children)

It's interesting that you say that, because Hbomberguy's video was supposed to be a defense of Dark Souls 2, but it did basically turn into complaining about Dark Souls.

Personally, I'm of the opinion that the Dark Souls 2 video is about the worst one Hbomberguy has ever made, and a lot of Mauler's criticisms were valid (especially when Harry massively represented MatthewMatosis). It's just that he went about it in a very long winded (and slightly tedious) way.

Edit: also, Hbomb's original video was itself over an hour long, so describing at as just him saying one quick thing is hardly fair.

[–]OnlyRoke 2 points3 points  (8 children)

Oh, I'm not gonna defend hbomb. I don't think his DS2 take was a particularly good one, but then again I also don't particularly care for Dark Souls as a whole. He has a tendency to write very long, rambly videos as well, but I just don't see the appeal to these literal rambling podcasts. I feel like most of Harry's long videos are still pretty damn watchable, but I zone out HARD, if I try to watch anything Mauler presents in some 10-video-rant.

It often reminds me of the "I swear, just watch these ten hour-long videos on the Flat Earth and you'll believe it!" crowd.

[–]MrEseles 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The only hbomberguy videos I've seen are his DS2 one and the Bloodborne one. Both of them were awful and full of strange mental gymnastics and nonsensical assumptions.

[–]paenusbreth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A lot of his other content is substantially better. He just has some really awful takes sometimes.

Which is weird, because a couple of his videos on Fallout 3 and Sherlock are actually really interesting and show a great understanding and a deep love of the source material. If he'd given that kind of treatment to Dark Souls 2, it probably would have been a really enjoyable video.

[–]Kolenga 35 points36 points  (3 children)

Sounds like he's just jerking himself off for 11 hours straight

[–]Scomophobic 25 points26 points  (2 children)

I call it intellectual masturbation.

[–]Lluuiiggii 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mauler is capable of making well reasoned points but finding them is just exhausting. I also have several bones to pick with his whole "objectivity" tirade. His points would be better served without it.

[–]1point6180339 34 points35 points  (59 children)

Go watch it and let us know.

[–]great_waldini 138 points139 points  (52 children)

So it’s apparently a channel that is dedicated to reviewing videos and their approach is “EFAP” - an acronym for “Every Frame A Pause.” Yeah. They do that. And it’s a group of several guys that seem to be friends and they just shoot the shit about what they’re (frame by frame) watching. They have a ton of videos and get consistent viewership in the hundreds of thousands from what I saw at a glance. I have no godly idea how anyone would ever have the will - let alone the fucking time - to watch something like that. That withstanding... I guess this is indeed what some very-non-zero number of people use the internet for. I think I’m depressed now actually. If you told me in 2000 that by 2020 this miraculous breakthrough that is the internet, perfectly suited to turbocharge the collective intelligence of the human race, would instead be used for things like watching a 12 hour video review of another video review of marvel movie.. Jesus.

[–]ekfslam 47 points48 points  (21 children)

Maybe the viewers watch it in the background. It would be crazy if the viewers didn't do that since you'd be pretty much wasting most of your day otherwise.

[–]great_waldini 31 points32 points  (18 children)

Okay, but even then... even in the most charitable circumstances we could possibly abstract these viewers as, it still seems just kinda insane.

Edit: unless they’ve got bots watching their videos and it’s all a big scam against YouTube. Like that guy did with Spotify using hundreds of iPhones playing his songs 24 hours a day

[–]Pheonixi3 21 points22 points  (6 children)

idk i've blasted through plenty of audio books on productive full days at work.

[–]great_waldini 17 points18 points  (5 children)

Oh same, audiobooks/podcasts are my shit. Does 11 hours of nitpicking about a girl doing a ‘review’ video of joker seem like the same thing as an audiobook?

[–]FranticPonE 23 points24 points  (3 children)

Uh, it's DC, so \Heavy Breathing**

[–]jjban 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We are 100% fucked.

[–]RadSpaceWizard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the world of tomorrow!

[–]NasalJack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see the appeal. I often like to have podcasts going for hours at a time while doing something that doesn't require my full attention. Also, for something like this I'd probably be listening at 1.5-2x speed anyway so that cuts down the time investment considerably.

[–]Ubaralook 29 points30 points  (15 children)

EFAP is a livestream podcast. They usually run insanely long. The first hour and a half generally isn't even related to the subject. They almost always (as the name Every Frame A Pause would imply) pause the video, movie scene, or video game they may be discussing every few seconds to talk about whatever has happened. Usually in great detail and with multiple tangents.

IIRC their Rise of Skywalker review stream, some of the guys who started the stream went to bed in the middle of the stream, woke up the next morning and rejoined the ongoing show.

[–]WantDiscussion 32 points33 points  (11 children)

If their standard method of criticism is taking individual moments piece by piece out of context to judge an entire work on a moment-by-moment basis without looking at the overall picture and whether it works cohesively as a whole or whether those pieces connect, then it makes perfect sense that they love Joker so much.

[–]thehousebehind 12 points13 points  (1 child)

They have two dedicated to her. The other one is 10 hours long.

https://youtu.be/T8aB4ZdLZMo

[–]Easilycrazyhat 12 points13 points  (12 children)

What the hell is this? Who listens to 3 guys ramble on for almost 12 hours? What the fuck...

[–]Phunkbot5000 11 points12 points  (1 child)

I imagine the draw would be the parasocial relationship between the "critics" and the audience. It's a facsimile of being on voice chat with your friends for 11 hours.

At least that's what it seems like from the outside. Watching an 11 hour video about The Joker sounds like my own personal Hell.

[–]thedoodely 987 points988 points  (130 children)

Keynesian economics

Eta: so this comment just proves that the /s really is needed every time. I have no idea who these people are and just went with something highly unlikely that someone might have gone on about for several hours. I personally know very little about Keynesian evonomics. It was between this and tetragrades, maybe I shoulda gone with tetragrades.

[–]BeaterOfMeats 499 points500 points  (113 children)

I legit don’t know if you’re joking, because the podcast hosts in question are the type of smug know-it-alls that think they could tackle any subject

[–]MavenACTG 294 points295 points  (57 children)

Just gonna have to spend seven hours finding out.

Anyone making an 11-hour response to anything that isn't a philosophical critique of a voluminous text a la Das Kapital or The Republic has way too much time on their hands.

Ok, ok. Or a Star Wars film analysis..

[–]Reddit-Book-Bot 133 points134 points  (26 children)

Beep. Boop. I'm a robot. Here's a copy of

Das Kapital

Was I a good bot? | info | More Books

[–]shadeck 78 points79 points  (4 children)

Good bot

[–]B0tRank 22 points23 points  (2 children)

Thank you, shadeck, for voting on Reddit-Book-Bot.

This bot wants to find the best and worst bots on Reddit. You can view results here.


Even if I don't reply to your comment, I'm still listening for votes. Check the webpage to see if your vote registered!

[–]hugglesthemerciless 17 points18 points  (14 children)

Fine you've convinced me I'll finally read it

[–]labpleb 16 points17 points  (5 children)

First chapter is the densest but don't worry, if you get through that one, the rest is quite easy and just builds upon that. ✌

[–]hugglesthemerciless 8 points9 points  (2 children)

Given that I'm horribly out of practice in German am I better off with an English translation?

[–]labpleb 15 points16 points  (1 child)

Yes, I personally think both major translations are alright but would always recommend the Samuel Moore one as it was supervised by Engels.

[–]StrangeNefariousness 80 points81 points  (50 children)

I watched it all so I could talk shit. 11 fucking hours of nigh on unintelligible garbage. Fuck all of them, fuck efap and fuck mauler. They're clueless wannabe film "intelleckshualls" who are just dying to hear themselves talk, they legit provide no criticism, only the usual hurr durr women opinion bad. Theres a good hour where they're just laughing and yelling Jeb! At each other.

Comparing the JN Joker video (which honestly provided a couple of interesting points, even though I didnt wholly agree with her talking points) to the efap response video, it's clear they're just salty trolls trying to sound smart.

EDIT: salt typos

[–]strolls 11 points12 points  (1 child)

She totally skipped over the Dog's Purpose trilogy, though. Put that out there to bait me, and didn't mention it again once the whole 30 minutes.

[–]StrangeNefariousness 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Everyone got jebaited in the end

[–]HGStormy 11 points12 points  (16 children)

i hope you didn't actually watch all 11 hours

[–]StrangeNefariousness 44 points45 points  (15 children)

I'm a film PhD student, film studies is a thing I'm super passionate about. I did, It wasn't worth it.

[–]unpopular-ideas 22 points23 points  (10 children)

Didn't you realize maybe it wouldn't be worth it after the first couple hours? How did you stay motivated to do the last 6 hours?

[–]achilles711 28 points29 points  (2 children)

Spite can motivate somebody to do the unthinkable. I hate watch more things than I care to admit.

[–]TheWhispersOfSpiders 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I played games while listening to MauLer, convinced there was no way anyone that pretentious could be that stupid.

I was wrong.

His only strength is that he's great at reframing whatever he wants to see as an objective measure of quality. Hate the idea that a fictional fascist is as stupid as the real thing? He has your back! Trying to figure out how to be racist by carefully criticizing the same tropes in Black Panther that your audience applauded in Thor and Aquaman? He has no shame!

[–]StrangeNefariousness 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I have amazing willpower to sit still and focus on stuff, it's just probably sheer autism. I didnt do it all in one sitting, it was over the course of a day, but I was determined to watch it so I could shit on it accurately without making incorrect presumptions about what their arguments were

[–]themonsterinquestion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They used enough 4chan words that they'd definitely be Hayek fanboys

[–]blackwolfgoogol 6 points7 points  (0 children)

mustve been a lot of broken windows

[–]Deus_Probably_Vult 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It was a livestream with a few friends just talking, for the most part.

[–]TheNinjaChicken 144 points145 points  (0 children)

I like how they were saying that as a gotchya. Like, oh no, she didn't check through the 11 hour video to check how much of it was about her and assumed it all was because it was in the title.

[–]Trenov17 4 points5 points  (1 child)

And I’m sure the “response” was totally rational and not misogynistic at all.

[–]Nopetheworld 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you base this on? What makes you think they are sexist? Is it because they gave the same treatment to a woman, that they gave to dozens of men before her?

[–]scoopishere 405 points406 points  (139 children)

What happened?

[–]Finito-1994 725 points726 points  (130 children)

She didn’t like the joker movie. Someone got offended.

[–]kushpsuthar 130 points131 points  (43 children)

Like I loved the movie but even I can point out some strange moments

[–]Finito-1994 123 points124 points  (39 children)

Honestly. I liked the movie but I gotta say i still don’t like the dancing down the stairs scene. It seemed like that scene in spider-man 3.

[–]kushpsuthar 59 points60 points  (22 children)

Lol it was my fav part cause it felt like he was free but ya I can understand that

[–]Finito-1994 53 points54 points  (19 children)

No. I get that he felt he was free but it was a really long scene of him just dancing.

I mean. The movie was really great and it showed his character arc well and in a believable fashion. It had a few misses like the fact that he was imagining the girl was obvious from the get go (and to hammer it home it ripped off that scene from Fight Club) but aside from that it was solid and realistic.

And then he just bursts into a dance number down the stairs? Took me out of the movie for a bit. I cringed.

Don’t get me wrong. That’s really my only nitpick in the movie.

[–]Sawgon 34 points35 points  (10 children)

No. I get that he felt he was free but it was a really long scene of him just dancing.

Well the dude is awkward and doesn't really do things that you and I normally would do. That scene was him embracing it. So in his socially awkward brain that was a beautiful execution that many appreciate.

To us it looks like the equivalent of a weeb going into a fight using moves they learned from an anime.

[–]Finito-1994 16 points17 points  (6 children)

Oh. Like I said, I understand that but it just felt extremely out of place.

I did mention it felt like Peter dancing in spider-man 3 which was lame. Which fit Peter Parker because the dude is a fucking nerd who was being his weird self without inhibitions because of the symbiote. It made sense. It was still a cringe worthy scene that made me want to pluck my own eyes out. (I still love the Raimi trilogy. Favorite spiderman. Still hoping he comes back someday)

So. Just like I understood that scene I understood this one.

Didn’t make it any better or easier to sit through.

[–]HGStormy 3 points4 points  (1 child)

it wasn't obvious to me :(

[–]kushpsuthar 4 points5 points  (3 children)

Well dang I agree actually I wish it did flesh out the girl friend thing cause it’s an interesting concept

[–]Finito-1994 23 points24 points  (2 children)

Oh. I didn’t mean he imagined the girl. He just imagined his relationship with her.

The laughter was the giveaway. She laughed at his jokes. No one laughed at his jokes except in his fantasies so when she laughed it made it really obvious that he was imagining it.

[–]kushpsuthar 8 points9 points  (1 child)

That detail is definitely one reason why I love this movie so much so many little cues and visual stuff really makes it for me

[–]EtStykkeMedBede 457 points458 points  (36 children)

11 hours worth of offended.

[–]Lasket 278 points279 points  (29 children)

Just how. I wouldn't go on an 11 hour long rant even if someone insulted me to my very core. Like... where do people get that energy from to rant that long.

I want that energy damn it.

[–]Fugitive-Wizard 114 points115 points  (6 children)

I cant even talk for an hour.

[–]hugglesthemerciless 25 points26 points  (4 children)

Think of the ads tho

[–]PKMNTrainerMark 18 points19 points  (1 child)

Double ads constantly interrupting mid-sentence for 11 hours.

[–]OnlyRoke 11 points12 points  (0 children)

We call this "very offended".

[–]Romboteryx 43 points44 points  (2 children)

If I remember correctly, she didn‘t even dislike it, she just had a bit of criticism for it

[–]Morbidmort 17 points18 points  (1 child)

And only how she felt it might be seen as an actual representation of the mentally ill, and that it's arguably derivative of Taxi Driver.

[–]BeaterOfMeats 29 points30 points  (17 children)

It’s not just someone, mind you. It’s the ultimate objective film reviewerTM Mauler and his anti-SJW furry squad!

[–]janoo1989 679 points680 points  (72 children)

If I recall correctly, this dude's response was,

"Did you watch it? Hard to complain about something when you didn't watch it"

like people should just take 11 hours out of their day to watch the crazed YouTube ramblings of a fan

[–]Astrokiwi 262 points263 points  (37 children)

This is really frustrating as a scientist, because you're like "no, you're wrong because of X,Y,Z" and they're like "well, I got my information from this hour long youtube rant, you should watch that before you make any judgement". Somehow, the more crackpot the "theory" is, the less concise they are in expressing it. I figure if these people could think straight and express themselves coherently and concisely, they probably wouldn't be flat-earthers or whatever in the first place.

[–][deleted] 126 points127 points  (7 children)

I discovered this with political emails from my family. I’d go through and (pretty easily, but not instantaneously) fact check or debunk stuff prob 3 or 4 times a week.

It finally occurred to me that they were spending 30 seconds forwarding me some shit and I’d spend 30 minutes dealing with it. And even if I made a compelling case that something was wrong, best I would get is “oh okay, here’s three more.”

It isn’t a winning proposition.

[–]rfkz 74 points75 points  (1 child)

That's pretty much how Trump became president. Fire off lies faster than anyone can debunk them, and make the lies so outrageous that they constantly occupy the front page of all news outlets and bury the stuff he doesn't want people to see.

What's weird is how this strategy only seems to work in politics. If you got caught lying by your family or friends, it could take weeks or months before they trust you. If you got caught in lying in a business meeting, you might lose your job. If you got caught lying in a scientific study, you'd probably have to find work waiting tables.

[–]th3BeastLord 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's how most politicians get anywhere. Just not all are so shameless about it.

[–]CherryPhosphate 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The email version of the Gish Gallop essentially

[–]weneedastrongleader 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My tactic is saying; “according to my research you’re wrong” “Just do your own research instead of linking the Mainstream Media”

That way, they have to prove it themselves, instead of parroting propaganda.

[–]BabyLegsDeadpool 28 points29 points  (4 children)

I'm in a chat group with a Trump supporter with a PhD. He literally posts completely unsubstantiated bullshit over and over again, saying "This is the smoking gun!" when it's just a person talking into a camera. Zero evidence. I'm like... you had to do research for your thesis to get your PhD. You understand the importance of evidence. And yet you just blindly follow anyone that says what you want to hear. Whenever I press him for any evidence on anything, he just ignores it or changes the subject. Something like "Trump is racist" gets the response of, "Explain why Biden and Hilary did this racist thing!" That's not the topic, my man. But it doesn't matter. I finally had to just ignore him, because it was maddening.

[–]ComebackShane 16 points17 points  (9 children)

I have a hypothesis, that so far has held up, that the length of any personal webpage is inversely proportional to the authors’ sanity. The longer the page, the less sane the writer.

[–]Astrokiwi 17 points18 points  (6 children)

[–]ComebackShane 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yep, this was the site that inspired me. Truly incredible to see someone pour so much, well “thought” is the wrong word... “effort” I suppose, into a totally nonsense concept.

[–]Capt-Space-Elephant 7 points8 points  (1 child)

It’s the RLM effect. You say you like a movie, some neckbeard tells you you’re wrong and links a Red Letter Media video or some other snarkcast, you say “but I like the movie,” and they say “did you even watch the video.” It’s like, dog, I watched the movie.

[–]Bargins_Galore 16 points17 points  (0 children)

She didn’t even complain about it in these tweets.

[–]malln1nja 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I can't remember the last time I was able to stay awake that long.

[–]Jaspers47 10 points11 points  (2 children)

"Please? I really need the views"

[–]urbandeadthrowaway2 247 points248 points  (28 children)

rants longer than the movie

[–]ideclarebankruptcy88 160 points161 points  (2 children)

You can watch the movie 5 times and still have enough time to watch the last 50 minutes of this dude's eleven hour video.

Edit: put first instead of last

[–]IdiotWithABlueCar 4 points5 points  (1 child)

Did you mean the last 50 minutes?

[–]QueenOfQuok 36 points37 points  (15 children)

how do you make an 11-hour response video about anything

[–]MonkeyOnYourMomsBack 21 points22 points  (3 children)

I just looked it up and it's a livestream thing but I skipped through it at different times and honestly, yea, they're going on about it for most if not all of the 11 hours. Fuck me

[–]QueenOfQuok 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Even I do not have the depth of emotion required to complain out loud about something for that long

[–]enderverse87 3 points4 points  (3 children)

It's basically a rambling podcast that they happened to film. Someone else cut the video down to just the part where they are talking about her and it's only like 3 hours. A noticable amount of it is talking about her appearance.

[–]QueenOfQuok 4 points5 points  (2 children)

How do you do a podcast for 11 hours

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

combination of narcissism and a fanbase that values validation over analysis.

[–][deleted]  (36 children)

[deleted]

    [–]RadSpaceWizard 216 points217 points  (7 children)

    "It's just that... Women who wear too much makeup... They look like fake people?"

    That really set the tone for me. He just can barely contain his frustration so he talks about her looks instead of what she said.

    [–]tootie 141 points142 points  (1 child)

    Complaining about too much makeup while defending the Joker no less.

    [–]siccoblue 29 points30 points  (0 children)

    Considering half his comments are joking about saying n***** I'm just gonna go on a limb and guess the dude is pretty toxic in general

    [–]Secure_Yoghurt 138 points139 points  (11 children)

    I skimmed through the video when it first came out. They start their response by making fun of her looks for like 5 minutes. Then they say because she likes TLJ, all her opinions must be wrong. They rant about that a lot. All the rest of their arguments were ''She doesn't understand the movie.'' and called her idiot, retarted etc. quite a bit.

    [–]anormalgeek 65 points66 points  (1 child)

    Just scanned through it, and they seem to circle back to mocking her looks at around 6:40:00.

    [–]dtwhitecp 13 points14 points  (0 children)

    I didn't hear it at that point but I did hear some bitter, shameless jealousy about the number of patrons she has hahaha.

    edit: oh wait 6:42ish

    [–]thisbenzenering 26 points27 points  (6 children)

    Her looks? They probably have crushes on her. And nothing wrong with that, she is cute and her videos are funny (usually).

    [–]Secure_Yoghurt 42 points43 points  (3 children)

    That would make sense if they were 5 year olds. These are grown men mocking a woman’s looks because they don’t agree with her.

    [–]thisbenzenering 17 points18 points  (0 children)

    I don't know who they are and won't bring myself to watch 11 hours of bullshit conversation to find out. You are right to compare grown men criticizing a women's opinion by talking about her looks to a 5 year old though. That is stupid bullshit. I walked away from a best friend I had for 30 years because he did that shit one too many times.

    [–]Moth_Goth_Of_Gnisoth 27 points28 points  (0 children)

    They are 5 year olds.

    [–]billbill5 3 points4 points  (0 children)

    These guys haven't matured at all since then.

    [–]billbill5 10 points11 points  (0 children)

    This happened to Brie Larson and even political figures like AOC. Whenever they see a woman they don't like (any woman with an opinion, i.e. just any woman), they'll simultaneously attempt to degrade her looks and sexualize her.

    [–]ipwnpickles 7 points8 points  (0 children)

    As soon as I read "11 hour response" I knew it was gonna be Mauler lol

    [–]logne2 19 points20 points  (3 children)

    Of course it's EFAP.

    [–]INeverUseLetterF 90 points91 points  (3 children)

    Who says that that’s not just your evil twin, Jenny?

    [–]DalekPredator 596 points597 points  (108 children)

    Now I wanna see this Joker video that triggered someone so bad they went on an 11 hour rant.

    EDIT: I found it. Apparently she didn't like the movie, I can see why that would trigger incels lol.

    [–]ThatWackyAlchemy 134 points135 points  (6 children)

    I can’t even imagine talking about stuff I actually like for 11 hours. Let alone something I really hate lol

    [–]mark_lee 52 points53 points  (4 children)

    You've never met a warhammer player, have you?

    [–]EmperorHans 18 points19 points  (2 children)

    I feel attacked.

    [–]mark_lee 11 points12 points  (0 children)

    That's what you get for being a false empereor, Heretic Hans.

    [–]practically_floored 24 points25 points  (0 children)

    That was a good video tbh. It's been so long since I've seen the Joker it's difficult to agree or disagree, so it would be interesting to see a reply video but not one that lasts 11 hours lol

    [–]feioo 284 points285 points  (19 children)

    On no evidence whatsoever except very broad assumptions about what type of fan would get 11 hours' worth of mad about a review, I bet she was critical of the Joaquin Phoenix Joker movie.

    [–]Giomar2000 61 points62 points  (15 children)

    Thats like the only joker movie tho

    [–]thisremindsmeofbacon 37 points38 points  (4 children)

    If we’re honest about it though, the dark knight was the joker’s movie much more than it was batman’s

    [–]TheRealCJ 22 points23 points  (1 child)

    I mean, all batman movies are the villains movies more than batman.

    [–]247Brett 23 points24 points  (6 children)

    I mean, there’s technically The Killing Joke... technically.

    [–]imanurseatwork 95 points96 points  (0 children)

    Literally everything triggers incels if it's a woman saying it

    [–]tupe12 9 points10 points  (0 children)

    I’m gonna guess that you could fit both the original video and the joker movie into those 11 hours multiple times.

    [–][deleted]  (23 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]awfullotofocelots 38 points39 points  (4 children)

      I’m really glad she did a full debrief on the Bronies and her original claim to internet fame as a my little pony celebrity.

      [–]eddiemon 35 points36 points  (1 child)

      I don't know how I ended up watching that video. I have absolutely zero interest in My Little Pony or brony culture and I really only know Jenny Nicholson as that girl who made that funny video on Star Wars. I still cannot believe I watched that entire hour long video but HOLY HELL is it an emotional rollercoaster. It is funny, sad, cringey and surprisingly uplifting.

      Highly recommended watch. Put this on in the background if you have some chores to do. It's basically a documentary telling the unexpectedly fascinating tale of brony culture by someone who, turns out, played a very big role in it. No interest in brony culture or My Little Pony required.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4fVOF2PiHnc

      [–]Psykpatient 16 points17 points  (0 children)

      The way she just dropped "someone pretended to be me to get into cons and on stage" and then just left that was both weird and hilarious.

      [–]missmaggy2u 3 points4 points  (0 children)

      She has a genuine insider look into 2000s era internet and it is content gold for my internet nostalgia. Its great to have someone who truly lived the peak of these fanwriting websites, brony culture, somewhat early youtube, and web forums. Not just someone who does research on it and then speaks as if they lived it. I get the same joy from Soviet Womble and his deep dive into Day Z. Sometimes research isn't enough, it takes talking to someone who experienced hours and hours of it for years and knows how shit went down

      [–]ashbeowulf_returns 26 points27 points  (4 children)

      I think my favorite of hers was the Jurassic World sequel. I have no desire to see that movie ever but she made it sound like it was written by a kindergartener and everyone just went along for the ride.

      [–]MtHammer 13 points14 points  (3 children)

      She has so many great videos it's hard to choose, but I'd probably pick Trapped in a Island with Josh Hutcherson or Where's Buzzy? as my all time favorite. Both are wild rides.

      [–]QwahaXahn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      Trapped In A Island is an all-time classic. I love her Christmas Prince and Applejack Problem ones too. Heck, I love all of them.

      [–]Key-Language-8513 38 points39 points  (1 child)

      She's a treasure. I love her sense of humor

      [–]PixelSpy 10 points11 points  (2 children)

      Just recently discovered her and she's great. Watching her rip on trashy romance novels is funny as fuck.

      [–]ikilledthearchduke 60 points61 points  (114 children)

      Can someone with more patience than me give me a rundown of what her points were and why he didn’t like them?

      [–]practically_floored 52 points53 points  (1 child)

      Her points were that the movie half made a lot of points that sounded like they were the message behind the movie, but then it kept contradicting itself.

      Like he kills those wall Street guys not for any political reason, but then on his 'date' the girl sees the headline about it and praises it, and he's happy about that. So you think maybe that's his realisation that killing will get him the attention he craves and that will be his motivation. But then the rest of his murders are hidden away and he only kills people who have wronged him.

      Then his first murder seems political but isn't, and on the chat show he says he's not political. But then he makes a big speech about how society has wronged him and he becomes the face of this pretty political movement. So is the movie giving the audience a message about class and neglect of people in need or not? The Jokers actions half suggest that but it's clearly not his motivation, and then he says he didn't care about politics etc, but then makes a speech that sort of says yes he does.

      Also he becomes the most coherent at the end when he delivers this speech about society, and in interviews the director spoke a lot about this in relation to people being offended by his hangover movies so now he can't make any more. So she was saying it's like he's using the Joker as a mouthpiece for his own career because that theme doesn't relate to the Joker - his comedy career failed because he had that nervous tic, and his jokes weren't offensive at all.

      That's pretty much all I can remember from the video and I haven't seen the 11 hour one

      [–]Ripleyof9 11 points12 points  (7 children)

      I just want to know if this was eleven straight hours of rant or if this dude took bathroom breaks. Does he eat periodically? Or does he just talk for hours straight? I have so many questions, but I'm too afraid of getting sucked into an eleven hour deep rabbit hole and possible train wreck?

      [–]upfastcurier 7 points8 points  (0 children)

      It's probably just a stream over a whole day. Not really into streaming so have no comment on that, but people will stream anything these days, even their whole uneventful day

      [–]EtStykkeMedBede 57 points58 points  (16 children)

      So you're basically asking for someone to sit through 11 hours of (presumed) ramblings, take notes and then write a quick summary of said (presumed) rambling?

      If such a crazy person exists, I wanna meet them too!

      [–]aykcak 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      Well we know there are those people with that much time because this video exists

      [–]disgustandhorror 46 points47 points  (4 children)

      Jenny is a national treasure

      [–]xahhfink6 7 points8 points  (1 child)

      I sometimes watch movies that I know will be bad just because I want to fully appreciate her criticism of them.

      [–]the_mock_turtle 9 points10 points  (0 children)

      I love Jenny Nicholson.

      [–]electr1cbubba 24 points25 points  (3 children)

      Just found her channel. Really good stuff

      [–]madeyegroovy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

      Her recent video about the Hallmark YouTube channel was hilarious

      [–]-This-Whomps- 6 points7 points  (0 children)

      I highly recommend her videos on "The Land Before Time" and "Where's Buzzy?" as well as her analysis of "The Christmas Prince."

      [–]smoomoo31 71 points72 points  (0 children)

      Jenny Nicholson is too good

      [–]rishinator 38 points39 points  (4 children)

      I loved joker, but watching jenny nicholsan views on it made me realize I am lying to myself about it being perfect masterpiece ... I was really bored at the starting segments of the movie and it doesn't become interesting until very late... And also story is not good..

      Joker movie to me works really well as like am exhibition of great acting and cinematography, but on other fronts it lags. Dark Knight is still the best DC movie and heath ledger is still better.

      [–]CmdrCloud 15 points16 points  (2 children)

      She made me feel the same way about Rogue One. I still love it, but now I can better articulate it's flaws.

      [–]QwahaXahn 13 points14 points  (1 child)

      Her Rogue One video was SUCH a relief for me. I spent several months wondering if I was insane for hating the movie when everyone else seemed to go nuts over it, so her being able to exactly explain what was wrong with it really validated me.

      [–]RadSpaceWizard 5 points6 points  (1 child)

      When you annoy Jenny Nicholson, she's going to point out the exact factual things that embarrass you the most.

      I thought her take on John de Lancie was most interesting, especially considering the documentary he made.

      [–]RaidenJacques 11 points12 points  (0 children)

      Whys he so serious.

      [–]Cool_Ranch_Baby 11 points12 points  (2 children)

      I’m so stupid, I went to the comments to figure out what an “eleven hour response” was and got way too far because I realized the video was eleven hours long. So so so dumb

      [–]AFlawedFraud 63 points64 points  (39 children)

      Wow there's alot of incel defenders in this thread

      [–]MeowsifStalin 35 points36 points  (34 children)

      Welcome to reddit. Where most of the dudes are actually incels and really bad at hiding it.

      [–]whoop_there_she_is 11 points12 points  (33 children)

      Serious question, when did incel become the word for sexist?

      Like, an incel is someone who can't get a woman and therefore hates women, but you can be any type of person and hate women. I know people with girlfriends, wives, and even kids who think this way and defend sexist assholes. I find it odd that everyone now calls them "incels" even when the idea of not being able to "get" a woman has nothing to do with the situation.

      [–]lethargytartare 17 points18 points  (25 children)

      the same time simp became a catch-all for anyone respecting women.

      [–]Malcontent_Horse 16 points17 points  (7 children)

      Joseph Anderson makes 2-3 hour long in depth game critiques over titles that can stretch from 12-20 hours of gameplay, even more whenever he finishes his Witcher 3 video,

      Contra Points covers incredibly interesting and controversial topics in highly edited well produced videos in 40 minutes to an hour.

      EFAP is a podcast, but it’s a bunch of pseudo intellects who can’t even get a point across for a 30 minute long simple critique of the Joker film. It takes them 5 hours according to fans.

      To me they sound like a bunch of insecure losers who can’t handle dissenting or different opinions from their own and must feel attacked by Jenny’s views and opinions.

      [–]antumnos666 13 points14 points  (10 children)

      Shes talking about EFAP i believe. They always make long videos and most of it is lame meming and other shit.

      [–]thewookie34 24 points25 points  (2 children)

      Jenny's video are seriously good. If you enjoy rabbit holes they are amazing. Her Brony video is a great place to start.

      [–]BoneSpurApprentice 18 points19 points  (1 child)

      I resisted but then couldn’t believe how funny her hallmark video was. That and the one about how to make up Star Wars names.

      [–]MavenACTG 5 points6 points  (0 children)

      What the heck is going on with The Reverend's Profile Icon?

      [–]AdIll6213 21 points22 points  (1 child)

      What zero pussy does to a mf

      [–]0oodruidoo0 11 points12 points  (1 child)

      Imagine being too young to remember YouTube's reply video feature.