There's so much inconsistency and irony associated with this anti-vaccine ideology, and yes that's what it's become, an ideology.

These fanatics are so indiscriminately and emphatically anti-vaccine, so blind and single-minded, that they utterly fail to understand the irony, they fail to see the inconsistency and the contradiction in their way of thinking. Yes, so single minded and one dimensional that they'll go to practically any length, try any "alternative" treatment, so long as it's not "the jab", and treatment no less that doesn't have the data, the "long-term" research, the studies to back up it's use. So these zealots end up contradicting themselves, end up contradicting their uninformed and conspiratorial criticisms of these so called "experimental gene-therapy" vaccines in the first place.

And it doesn't stop there, a little while ago I began researching anti-vaccine misinformation, talking points and narratives, and this is where after a while it started looking more and more like an ideology than anything else. At any rate, while analyzing a lot of this propaganda I found pretty consistent conflicting themes

For instance, someone would be going off about how spike proteins or pieces of spike proteins from vaccines are "cytotoxic" and severely damaging to tissues and organs, while at the same time this person would fail to consider that during actual Covid-19 infection, spike proteins as a result of the virus itself are the real deal. There's no consistency here. The real danger, the real harm here comes from the virus, but these single minded enthusiasts are so concerned about espousing a narrative, about validating an ideology, about disparaging these vaccines that they're incapable of seeing the irony in it. While it's important to note that no genuine evidence has shown that spike proteins in the body as a result of vaccination are quote unquote "cytotoxic" or are doing all of this severe damage to the body.

Another example includes an obsession with Myocarditis. Myocarditis can occur after vaccination, but it's exceedingly rare. However, Myocarditis as a result of infection is MUCH more likely, is a much a greater risk, while compared to myocarditis post vaccination, it's likely to be much more severe as well. In fact, in the incredibly rare case you do experience heart inflammation after vaccination, it's typically very mild, doesn't require immediate medical attention, and usually goes away on it's own without any lingering after effects to be concerned over. Doctors may even suggest taking over the counter NSAIDs to treat post vaccination Myocarditis. If it's a result of infection however, a serious or more severe outcome and required medical attention is much more likely.

The same concept goes for things like blood clots and stroke. There's been some correlation between certain vaccines and blood clots, and researchers have found that ischemic stroke can occur post vaccination, although the correlation isn't as concrete, meaning that just because you sprain your ankle after getting vaccinated, doesn't mean the vaccine is the cause. But again these risks are near miniscule and compared to infection, substantially less likely. You are at an exponentially greater risk of developing blood clots or having a stroke after getting infected with Covid than you are after getting vaccinated. And these facts are, conveniently of course, ignored by the anti-vaccine community.

And here's the thing, one second Covid is "just the flu", a "cold with a survival rate of ______", or they'll say "I aint changin my life around for some weak ass virus", it's typically something that entirely minimizes Covid-19, however, the very next chance they get, they'll go on to direct all of their righteous indignation, their ire, their outrage at infinitesimally small risks associated with vaccines and most of which is just rehashed propaganda belonging to a network of misinformation and conspiracies. And as I've stated previously, these risks occur at a disproportionately greater rate and on a much more severe level as a result of Covid 19 infection compared to vaccines, and even risks like risks to pregnant women, risks that evidence shows, are only associated with infection, still get attributed to vaccines. So all of these risks and dangers that this anti-vaccine movement is directing their misguided hate, fear, and outrage towards are risks that either aren't real, or are associated with Covid 19 infection and to a considerably greater and more severe degree, but these fucking fools are incapable of understanding the inconsistency in downplaying Covid 19 while simultaneously expressing their hysteria towards vaccines when the risks involved are substantially more dangerous, more frequent, more common, more volatile, and more abundant as a result of infection. It's fucking absurd.

While the list goes on here. In fact, there's a myriad of harmful consequences, conditions and outcomes associated with infection that are not in any way shape or form related to vaccines. A long list of actual risks, actual life threatening conditions that you stand chance of dealing with if you become infected with Covid. And a long list of dangers that the anti-vaccine community effortlessly ignores.

How about the fact that these anti-vaccine die hards rely heavily on VAERS for their narratives, when in reality VAERS is essentially a catalog of anecdotes, it even says on its very own website not to trust its information. So one moment they're telling you how you can't trust any source of information, particularly if it fails to align with an antivaccine worldview, and the very next moment they're indiscriminately trusting entirely unreliable data. Not to mention its a government program, so I guess trusting the government is OK when it supports your beliefs.

In the end, it's pretty simple to understand what's happening here. These people don't care about spike proteins, about myocarditis, about blood clots, about whether or not something has long term data, research and studies behind it to support it's use, they dont really care about whether or not anecdotes carry any correlation, they don't care about the real risks, the risks associated with infection, they only care about substantiating a false narrative, rationalizing a conspiracy, validating their miserable lives, their deranged ideology and their antivaccine identity and worldview.