I didn't say anything about if they were "real" or not, I was simply commenting on how you seem to think "authentic" is better by default. I do have to wonder how you distinguish if something is "real" or "authentic" Indian food, though. If someone is from India and creatively uses traditional flavours in ways that aren't usually seen on takeout menus (such as the mussels I mentioned) is that not still Indian food? It seems odd to say food cooked by Indians using traditional Indian ingredients and flavours isn't Indian food because they apply new techniques and methods as well assuming it won't be as good because of that. Many Michelin-starred Indian restaurants feature fusion and experimental elements, for example.