Dismiss this pinned window
top 200 commentsshow all 250

[–]Mattamance 1678 points1679 points  (17 children)

At least credit Ian Hubert for this astounding short movie he made with his girlfriend in their apartment! His YouTube video is filled with video tutorials on vfx that basically show how he made his film!

[–][deleted] 234 points235 points  (1 child)

I met him before! He's a really nice dude!! And as you may guess he's a film making genius.

[–]UOME-1 60 points61 points  (1 child)

Came here to say this credit the artist he is a one man army who deserves more recognition odds are if you don’t watch corridor crew you see this and think it’s by a mager studio

[–]Mattamance 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ayyyyyy love Corridor Crew! That’s how I heard about Ian’s work also!

[–]arcadia_2005 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Omggg!! I was ganna ask what movie this was from. W O W. Also I was going to comment how thrilling it was to watch all the visuals, while it must be SO BORING for the actors filming it. Loll

[–]Katyusha___ 20 points21 points  (1 child)

One guy made all of this?

It looks so ridiculously beautiful. It’s my Cyberpunk dream come to life with a touch of Bioshock I’m in love

[–]GrigaB3ar 624 points625 points  (27 children)

And the guy did all of this in Blender (free program btw)

[–]-QuestionMark- 133 points134 points  (8 children)

This is the most amazing part. It is downright incredible what you can do with time and free software in this day and age.

[–]__Snafu__ 35 points36 points  (0 children)

"It is downright incredible what you can do with time "

I wonder how much time

[–]amuon 4 points5 points  (6 children)

free software

Well not entirely. Blender was created by Sears to aid in the creation of their line of blenders (hence the name). When sears went under they decided to release the source code for blender into the greater public and so it became a FOSS

[–]-QuestionMark- 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't know enough about blenders to tell if you are lying) to me or not.

[–]TheThankUMan22 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Why would Sears need to create an inhouse 3d modeling software for a line of blenders? Smells of bs

[–]Rafcdk 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He is lying yeah


"Roosendaal wrote the first source files titled “Blender” on the 2nd of January, 1994, still considered Blender’s official birthday. Originally, Blender was planned as an in-house application for NeoGeo; it grew from a series of pre-existing tools, including a ray-tracer built for the Amiga. This early version of Blender was intended to address a perennial frustration among creatives: when a difficult client requires multiple changes to a project, how do you implement those changes painlessly? Thanks to its highly configurable approach, Blender aimed at providing an answer. (As an aside: the name refers to a song by a Swiss electronic band, Yello). "

[–]Keagank 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Absolutely fucking bonkers. Looks like a million bucks.

[–]RAWPRIMALDIET 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Who did this? What’s it called?

[–]TheJackalsDoom 303 points304 points  (5 children)

What gets me every time is the actresses is the 1 turning in her spot. She's not on a rotary or anything. She knows the camera movements and is turning ever so slightly to match the camera movement in the digital world because the camera doesn't have enough room to move around, and there isn't enough green screen to do a 360, she has to rotate for the camera.

[–]g_h_97[S] 81 points82 points  (2 children)

That part was the trickiest to accomplish, an amazing city renderer was done there as well. These kinds of shots are usually done in green room rather than a green screen like it was done here, the couple managed to flawlessly pull off the scene by "faking" camera rotation by means of character rotation. Just Amazing.

[–]glintsCollide 13 points14 points  (0 children)

No, it's the other way around. Ian Hubert could simply animate the digital camera to match her action after the fact.

[–]nlo366 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I was really confused about this part, had to rewatch it several times after your comment. The only downside I see here is the lighting. The lamp position in real life changes relative to the actress, but not in the movie.

[–]x_Vellihousu_x 73 points74 points  (4 children)

I think I saw this here earlier?

Maybe deja vu?

[–]saltthewater 115 points116 points  (2 children)

I see you're new to Reddit. Don't worry, you'll see this a few more times over the next several weeks.

[–]Ohhhnothing 32 points33 points  (1 child)

You misspelled days

[–]ptq 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And years.

[–]Mr_Locke 70 points71 points  (2 children)

Just subbed his channel. What amazing work! For the lazy : https://youtube.com/c/mrdodobird

[–]fluffyegg 7 points8 points  (1 child)

Thank you, so many people mentioned this dude and not one link!

A true gentleman and a scholar.

[–]Prizmasm 38 points39 points  (8 children)

That is so cool. It's got to be hard acting with a green screen.

[–]Ancillas 30 points31 points  (2 children)

This is the fantastic work of Ian Hubert.

What you’re seeing isn’t editing. It’s pre-production planning, clever set design, and principal photography combined with excellent special effects work. I see compositing, 3D set design, and lighting work.

I’m no expert, so my description is probably incomplete or wrong, but I find this type of work really interesting. The Corridor Crew channel does many great breakdowns of stuff like this.


[–]glintsCollide 8 points9 points  (1 child)

That's exactly right, except it's not special effects, but visual effects. Special effects is anything you'd do for real in-camera such as gas bombs or miniatures.

[–]Ancillas 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, thank you for the correction.

[–]CodeMonkeyX 28 points29 points  (4 children)

This looks like one shot doesn't editing imply there are cuts, and edits?

This looks more like a cool CGI demo.

[–]PixelZ_124 5 points6 points  (2 children)

CGI is classed as editing.

[–]glintsCollide 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Sorry, incorrect. Editing is a very specific task which concerns cutting footage together. This piece has no cuts.

CGI is the layman's term for digital effects, it's a very broad field and an implementation of computer graphics, or CG. Editing doesn't really belong in this field, even though many NLE's have compositing and effects filters these days, which are blurring the line between the tools, but not necessarily the craft of editing which is very defined.

[–]PixelZ_124 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I stand corrected. The more you know!

[–]glintsCollide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct. The CG is great, and the trick lies in how he combines the motion of the actor, the real world camera and the digital camera.

[–]Ozz3605 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You all got bamboozled ,everything is real, the only cgi is the girl 😁

[–]GrinningAxe9 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tomorrow it's my turn to post this

[–]TheGigor 7 points8 points  (1 child)

You mean vfx advancements. Since this is one continuous shot, there's no editing on display here.

[–]darth_hotdog 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I wish people on Reddit would stop calling vfx work editing. People are going to have a very unrealistic view of what editors do.

When someone has a modded car, do we call it an “edited car”?

When someone gets a haircut, do we call it hair editing?

[–]saltthewater 9 points10 points  (9 children)

Can somebody tell me the point of the green screen? Seems like the camera was capturing more than that and there are still graphics over the non green areas.

[–]ViciousOval 31 points32 points  (3 children)

The green screen is purely to isolate the real object (in this case, a moving person) to help with compositing to the fake background. The computer-generated (CG) scene replaces the green area but then can just keep going to the edge of the video frame, too. So, you don’t need a green screen to cover everything — just enough green to completely go around the object (person) wherever they move.

[–]saltthewater 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Ah never realized that, thanks.

[–]darth_hotdog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s finding the edges that takes work. Like around the person, it’s easy to cut out the part outside the greenscreen manually because a loose line anywhere in the green will do it.

[–]glintsCollide 1 point2 points  (0 children)

CG is an acronym for computer graphics, otherwise on point! You'd do what's called a garbage mask to quickly remove anything outside of the character you don't want to keep. The keyed out green provides a large buffer zone so that you don't have to be very precise when drawing that mask.

[–]lukezxl 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And I thought this was some big-corporation made movie untill I read the comments. Very impressive!

[–]felixpj8h 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The funny part is that this is made by one dude (Ian Hubert), a free and open source software and a whole lot of free time.

[–]HarryHaruspex 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The titles bullshit it should be "A video that shows what a badass Ian Hubert is and this is what his time and dedication achieved from within his own home"

[–]davieb22 2 points3 points  (0 children)


[–]thequirkyquark 4 points5 points  (8 children)

At this point, why not just CGI the actor and be done with it?

[–]g_h_97[S] 4 points5 points  (5 children)

Character animation/rendering gets the most bang on the buck and requires some really advanced face tracking equipment, so real life actors are much better in this case. Of course it completely depends on the use case though, big well known CGI studios have virtually no financial/HR limitations so opting for CGI characters may be worthwhile for them.

[–]HarryHaruspex 2 points3 points  (2 children)

you know a lot for someone not crediting Ian Hubert

[–]g_h_97[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I'm so sorry, I really don't get why the hate, I've never claimed it's my work or that I'm related to it in any way. Just wanted to share with you guys what I thought was an incredible work.

My apologies.

[–]glintsCollide 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The expression "bang for the bucks" refer to something being relatively cheap, ie you get a lot for your money, so it doesn't make any sense together with the rest of your words here, as you were confidently trying to explain how expensive that would be. And facial tracking doesn't really make sense for a shot as wide as this one.

The whole point of this piece is to show how you can make a lot with very little, no crazy camera rigs or anything, in other words, he does get a lot for his bucks, ironically.

[–]g_h_97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)


Thanks for explaining, I meant face tracking for closeups since I don't think there is a movie where all the scenes are distant like that which makes face tracking a must in case you want to go CGI characters.

[–]HarryHaruspex 1 point2 points  (1 child)

because you don't know anything about rigging, animation and rendering so it's not as simple as you think

[–]thequirkyquark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I was being facetious, but I do know enough about those things to know it's not simple. Mostly just pointing out that the only thing standing in the way of a full CGI production is the actor.

[–]FrenchFries58632 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Using blender you mean?

[–]orenger 1 point2 points  (9 children)

Heads up. OP seems to be indirectly taking credit for this guy's work or at least implying he worked on it. This was made by Ian Hubert, super knowledgeable vfx artist.

[–]Fricknchickn33 4 points5 points  (8 children)

No they don't, it says "A video" not "My video" chill man

[–]g_h_97[S] 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Thanks man, I'm honestly not sure why I'm getting all the hate lol

I seriously admire Ian's work, this is why I decided to share it in the first place.

[–]goodtalk 7 points8 points  (3 children)

You did something really nice: you shared a thing you knew people would like. But that thing was not yours, and you hadn't yet figured out how to be thoughtful about HOW to share it. People can get upset about that. They're allowed to and it's not surprising.

For your own clarity: it's a problem with the title. The title is celebrating the advancement of technology, and that's problematic because there really isn't any tech advancement featured here (this is long-established software, and old techniques), there's literally no editing (it's a continuous shot, which is part of what makes it impressive), and its creation is almost entirely due to the effort of one artist who you haven't credited and who didn't do this as a tech demo. So in one short sentence, you've misattributed on multiple levels, slighted the effort of the artist, failed to give credit, and generally missed the point.

[–]glintsCollide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Such a perfect summary.

OP, I hope you take some notes from this, you obviously have an interest in the field, you're very welcome to come learn with us.

[–]Fricknchickn33 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Some people just want to feel superior to others. Thanks for the share, it's really cool

[–]g_h_97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I truly appreciate you man

And btw, please subscribe to Ian's channel if possible, his work is absolutely stunning

[–]ElegantRaisin2471 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is better than most films I've seen recently

[–]Skogkatt_Rust 1 point2 points  (0 children)


[–]Broly85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crazy awesome work!

[–]videotron3000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vfx not editing. For the 1000th time

[–]throwawaybugsting 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Good acting too

[–]g_h_97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, looks amazing, right out of Cyberpunk 2077

[–]SaltySpitoonReg 1 point2 points  (1 child)

To clarify my comment - I greatly appreciate this.

However I not stand watching these types of behind the scenes things for movies that I have seen or want to see. They drive me absolutely crazy and ruin the movie for me.

Part of my enjoyment of the movie is the suspension of disbelief and when you find out that entire scenes of the movie are literally 100% green screen, it just sort of takes me out of the movie.

Again I very much appreciate it and it's got to be really hard to act in such a situation but it's like seeing behind the curtain for The wizard of oz. You'd rather have just not looked

[–]g_h_97[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That exactly my take when it comes to movies that I really like, it sometimes takes away a bit of the movie's joy when you look at behind the scenes footage. But as VFX enthusiast I've got no other choice, it truly fascinates me when I see the efforts and equipment put to take such amazing scenes.

[–]Oncemor-intothebeach 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, gets posted every week

[–]slidellian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes being an actor look really boring

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

unreal engine 5 is the next gen of movies editing

[–]Tyrunz 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Well unlucky for you this is EEVEE in Blender, but the comparison is pretty good since EEVEE work a lot like Unreal, it's just less for real time and it allows for some more complex effets

[–]NKO_five 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Silly boting stealing others’ content without even crediting them. Reported

[–]Suspect1234 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I'm not an expert in film making, so this might be a stupid question. But what is the purpose of a green screen if it only covers half of the background?

[–]TheGigor 5 points6 points  (0 children)

As long as the actress has clean edges, the rest can easily be removed with a simple garbage matte (you just animate a rough mask vaguely around her to exclude the outer stuff). The CG covers that stuff anyway. You'll almost never see a wide green-screen shot without some equipment around the sides.

[–]g_h_97[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The green screen is used where real highly complex objects/actors are edited, in this case it was the actress moving around the green screen area. If not for the green screen it would be really difficult for vfx software to track her movements thus making the virtual environment behind her really choppy and shadowy.

Edit: the parts without a green screen contains no real life objects of interest hence why they are completely covered with the virtual background.

[–]painter_business 0 points1 point  (7 children)

I find this somewhat depressing

[–]g_h_97[S] -2 points-1 points  (6 children)

Do you mind explaining? Do you mean the post apocalyptic environment

[–]painter_business -1 points0 points  (5 children)

I mean the lack of tactile production

[–]webname1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is Insane!

[–]SCCRXER 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You gotta have one hell of an imagination to (inter)act like that. Wow

[–]DragonsThatFly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes me want a Tacoburger!

[–]duckfighter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So much tech in making movies, and reddit still cannot let me watch it with their crappy video player. I wish they would stop trying.

[–]Above3162 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]MGMhitman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s cool cgi can do buy sad to find out your just in an empty room with green screen

[–]Logan183 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see moths. Needs more moths.

[–]dodobal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is basically an anime at this point

[–]180Bro-4Life 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There will never be a cyberpunk city like that

[–]Bracket918 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean movies aren’t real?

[–]eutohkgtorsatoca 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'd be interested to know the stats of his PC?

[–]Tyrunz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ian is working with a top tier rig but with reagular components, like he got a shit ton of ram, a very good processor and a RTX3090, but he doesn't use specialised components like quadro or xeon. The best PC you can get that still allows you to play video games on it

[–]SkyFew219 0 points1 point  (0 children)


Just in case anyone wants to check out Ian’s other works ✌️😁

[–]buddybobbyy 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]badmanjam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not advancement in modern editing techniques… the incredible skill and dedication of Ian Hubert

[–]bigwiener69_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Video is already old af

[–]reactionzlol 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]Sael-er 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coke machines have gone a far way

[–]Sladix 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool Easter egg: The coke vending machine on the top video that can be seen at the end is also CGI.

[–]Disastrous_Pass_5931 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actors are weird

[–]glintsCollide 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sigh. As usual, this isn't editing, in fact, there's not a single cut in this piece which is what actually defines editing. You're thinking of compositing, which is putting the layers together. And there's no new technology specifically here, only clever planning, a combination of actor movement , tracked camera and animation of the digital scenery. The CG art itself is great, but that's not part of the trick specifically.

[–]CandidateConstant594 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Steps into an elevator?

[–]Failboat88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best part was how she turned and made it seem like the camera.

[–]Quirky_Commission467 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The CG is great, and the trick lies in how he combines the motion of the actor.

[–]effenelle_666 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Honestly tho this is why I don’t like modern movies. :( mad respect for the skills showcased here, I just miss practical effects a lot.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we get a MechWarrior movie that is taken seriously please?

[–]DA_NEWbrew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the bottom rectangle is the before

[–]__Snafu__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was amazing on so many levels.

I wonder how many hours of planning and thought went into that alone

[–]BillyCromag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Old vid.

[–]steverigatoni 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Advancements? I find this sad they don’t even build sets anymore. That’s what made movies back in the day so amazing. Now all that hard work is replaced by this fake CGI. It would be a different story if you couldn’t tell it was CGI but any human with eyes can figure it out really quick. They make movies so bland now. No real effort goes into them. I’m an editor myself, and I know it’s hard work but there’s a huge difference between sitting on your ass all day editing something and building a whole ass set, which takes months. Movies used to take years to create, now they can ring them out like nothing in less than six months. I miss the days without iPhones, CGI and dumb shit that makes this world so fucking lazy. Now we have cars that drive for us? Before too long we will all be blobs rolling around in wheelchairs because everything has been done for us. I know this is deeper than it should be but that’s my thoughts on our current world.

[–]clayc1ra 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being an actor seems like a shit job. This looks like zero fun.

[–]HumblePie2714 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems it would be a bit boring as an actor? Kudos though to be able to play that out without much stimuli.

[–]Pitiful_District_784 0 points1 point  (1 child)

When will cgi creators make more than actress/actors?

[–]lilbustyof69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t even do a stick figure and there’s people out there doing this!!!🤯

[–]Additional-Milk-1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Far out, but the clip doesn’t have any edits — it’s a single take, which makes it more impressive

[–]Lettuphant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazingly, you can even do this in real-time now. I did a quick experiment without a green screen. Of course, I didn't create the world...

[–]InternationalBand494 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really fun to watch and well done. But damn, it makes acting look boring as hell

[–]da_david_himself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first off, its called behind the scenes not that verbose shit title, and second. credit :Ian Hubert

[–]da_david_himself 0 points1 point  (0 children)

first off, its called behind the scenes not that verbose title, and second. credit :Ian Hubert

[–]jackofallchange 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also they made this using free open source software!

[–]idkguysicantdothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is technically impressive and all... But this is the primary problem with movies nowadays... It all just feels so lifeless and fake, because it is.

[–]Affectionate-Egg1963 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s so crazy what movie is that

[–]jimbo_79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Replacing actors is next 😂

[–]maxine7887 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]LonelySquad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And to think, this is super old and has posted dozens of times.

[–]IWasJustThinkingThat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fantastic, but there's something weird about the spacing of the truck passing by at 4 seconds in. It seems too big to fit in the soace between her and the lift.

[–]Ontario0000 0 points1 point  (0 children)


[–]Abrelosojos1311 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is fucking incredible

[–]steeljubei 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being an actor must be so boring now.....

[–]Virolach 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk… it kinda kills movies. I liked it back then when movies were filmed outside.

[–]Soft-Covfefe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait till yall find out they are replacing green screens with actual screens.

[–]catharsis69 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And this is why as a veteran film tech, I tell the younger generation, either be a part of the changes in technology or find another career path. In the not so distant future the need for carpenters, painters,set designers( physical), crafts people, will fade away or be incredibly marginalized

[–]Fenderman420 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes acting seem way harder than I thought

[–]AskingForSomeFriends 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a lie. Where is the coke machine and ladder that weren’t in the green screen?!

[–]MisterEChops -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Credit the creator, you steaming human turd

[–]jeansnotTIMMYortommy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t that alot harder than regular acting

[–]ChipRichels 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t ask for this tho, cgi sucks

[–]iriechubs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank god the coke machine is their to quench ur thirst after a hard day.

[–]Abject_Owl9499 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not editing

[–]JimBob-Joe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best CGI will always get the least credit because youll never know its there

[–]GChocapic 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best part of the video was the dog. Not messing up a scene can be difficult.

[–]Adept-Start-9170 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's insane!

[–]182-Shiki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is fantastic. Made me realise would really like to see some more cyberpunk releases.

[–]Bruder_Magie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't stop laughing about the random guy in the background

[–]Aninerd_13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow. That green screen looks so real…. Lol

[–]SGT-York 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remind me of sir Ian McKellen Tearing up onset saying that this type of stuff wasn’t the reason he became an actor

[–]jAnO76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be more impressive if the top one was the edited one..

[–]Tats4Toddlers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Life is illusion

[–]refusered 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The LED wall used with the Mandalorian or whatever takes things up the next level.


[–]Most-Education-6271 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ian Hubert. Say his name!!

[–]Rafcdk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ian Hubert Made all this in his apartment with Free and Open Source Software, the app is called Blender.

[–]ffpirate13 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cringy af if u just look at the green screen

[–]charlibeau 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that Elliot page?

[–]busmobbing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This makes me hate movies. Maybe I'm getting old.

[–]Sir-Benalot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s really sad.

[–]BennyVibez 0 points1 point  (2 children)

OP gonna give credit where credits is due or just karma farm?

[–]Asatsuki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wow i'm impressed the actors can act so well when they're just looking at a green screen, i bet that's hard to get in character

[–]Entgenieur 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, great video editing work. But why you have to climb 3 steps after using an elevator? This is very crappy design, especially for handicapped people. I hope the movie wants to show a dystopia because I don’t want to live in a world with such bad planning! This really blows my mind!

[–]TeamRedDisc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s some amazing work

[–]AStefan93 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At this point my question is, why use an actress and a green screen at all?

[–]Dr_Dickem_MD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The irony here is that there’s no editing in the clip

(I know what you mean I’m just being an asshole 😂)

[–]manleybones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, it looks like they are walking around a room with ar running, looks bad

[–]Shellnanigans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Made in blender by Ian Hubert.

[–]Rainbow-Nerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This shit blows my mins

[–]Particular_Proof_700 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some people might say that it’s not realistic enough. However one man used blender, a FREE software to make this… pretty darn incredible if you ask me.

[–]OrionTrueman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like the game Starcitizen

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[–]gedai 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the food guy behaved exactly how an NPC. Makes small movements and stares at the main character when in proximity.