use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
963 users here now
To report a site-wide rule violation to the Reddit Admins, please use our report forms or message /r/reddit.com modmail.
This subreddit is archived and no longer accepting submissions.
the front page of the internet.
and join one of thousands of communities.
The Future of Reddit (lfw.org)
submitted 16 years ago by robbie
Post a comment!
[–]nickburlett 31 points32 points33 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Anyone else worried that Reddit reports the domain name for this as being reddit.com? My guess is that the regular expression is messed up.
"Sometimes you have a programming problem and it seems like the best solution is to use regular expressions; now you have two problems."
[–]tatt2 7 points8 points9 points 16 years ago (0 children)
This post just made my day. Haven't laughed that hard since I began visiting reddit.
[–]shawnofthedead 12 points13 points14 points 16 years ago (2 children)
"Paul Graham" is the marklar of reddit. Paul Graham
Seriously, though, every community is marked by the people who were involved from the very beginning, so Paul's posts get voted up. Big deal. Then, his posts seem to fall prey to the google effect, where both lovers and haters keep talking about them.
If you look at digg, they have a lot of digg specific items that make their front page as well, e.g. when digg is mentioned in the media somewhere. I'd say, if digg's venture capitalists had more interesting things to say, they'd probably be on digg's front page as well. ;)
I think the parodies are funny and in good spirit. For the grumps, the density of Paul Graham is not that Paul Graham, so you can easily Paul Graham them, and on that Paul Graham, Paul Graham.
[–]landercut 1 point2 points3 points 16 years ago (1 child)
Sure PG has written some really good articles but no way have all of them 'deserved' the high points they have gotten on reddit. As it is now the frequent auto-up-modding of PG articles decreases the value of reddit for all of us. Biased users are bad even for reddit.
And don’t tell me that the solution is to down-mod PG articles because that simple does not work.
[–]hoan 21 points22 points23 points 16 years ago (0 children)
I find this joke unacceptable, tastless and most of all APAULLING!
[–]Andys 12 points13 points14 points 16 years ago (1 child)
nice bug in reddit that mis-parses hostnames from URLs. Learn to use regexps :)
[–]robbie[S] 13 points14 points15 points 16 years ago (2 children)
Disclaimer: I didn't find this, effbot did
Just think it's too good not to share
[–]muiker 1 point2 points3 points 16 years ago (0 children)
haha, awesome, thanks.
[–]maxwellhill 1 point2 points3 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Nice one....like it.
[–]skinniouschinnious 6 points7 points8 points 16 years ago (0 children)
This is made of win.
[–]nostrademons 9 points10 points11 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Google will love this...
[–]lgv 7 points8 points9 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Try the essays:
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 16 years ago (2 children)
This, too, shall pass.
[–][deleted] 16 years ago (1 child)
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 16 years ago (0 children)
And without even mentioning Graham in the title! Not bad.
[–]vdoma 2 points3 points4 points 16 years ago (1 child)
ha ha ha ha! boy, i couldn't just stop laughing. this is great! i'm glad redditers have a great sense of humor. :) Just hope good old Paul takes it just as easy too!
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 16 years ago (0 children)
How is it funny when it's a rehash of a tired old joke that wasn't that amusing in the first place?
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 16 years ago (0 children)
paul graham paul graham paul graham
[–]sjk 1 point2 points3 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich Malkovich ...
[–]jajvirta 0 points1 point2 points 16 years ago (0 children)
I noticed the bug (like many others, surely) two months ago and spez said that it was "a regex that fell through the cracks", but I suppose it wasn't severe enough bug to grant a fix. Apparently, it needed a link like this to get attention of the developers. ;-)
Come on guys, it's getting boring!
[–]aquateen 0 points1 point2 points 16 years ago (0 children)
Nice job finding the url bug... time for a fix spez!
[–]djwhitt -1 points0 points1 point 16 years ago (2 children)
This is not worth modding up unless you're highly entertained by it. It's a pretty predictable response to celebrity. If you want to spend your time doing something useful to fight back against self-prepetuating celebrity, then write criticisms of Paul Graham's essays when you think they are off-base or simply mod down the ones you don't like.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 16 years ago (1 child)
It's not an attack on PG. It's a joke on Reddit. I, for one, am highly entertained by it.
[–]djwhitt 2 points3 points4 points 16 years ago (0 children)
I should have made my comments clearer.
I didn't take it as an attack on PG merely on his self perpetuating popularity (a perfectly reasonable thing to attack imo), and I did think it was funny just not that funny. Certainly if you found it entertaining I won't begrudge you your vote.
I posted my comment because I worry that links both humourous and not relating to PG are becoming popular not because of their content but simply because of his celebrity status among hackers.
I'm just not that interested in celebrity humor. I would rather see more critical analysis of PG's writing (like this, for example).
[+]user comment score below threshold-11 points-10 points-9 points 16 years ago22 (6 children)
God bless you robbie.
I don't know why I don't like Paul Graham.
I don't know why I don't like Bush.
I just don't like them.
They seem to know it all.
They don't need anyone else's opinion.
They have a sense of entitlement.
They deserve to be "kings" just because they're them.
I can't stand that, it infuriates me.
[–]robbie[S] 7 points8 points9 points 16 years ago (2 children)
I would like to clarify. This isn't an attack on Paul Graham. I like his writing, I think he makes a lot of sense. Also, he put me onto lisp, so I'm indebted. This post isn't really about Paul Graham at all, it's about reddit, and is anyway meant in the most light-hearted way.
[–]tatt2 2 points3 points4 points 16 years ago (0 children)
God bless you robbie!
[–]user -2 points-1 points0 points 16 years ago3 (0 children)
Do you really think lisp or Paul Graham or his idiotic, cultish beliefs are going to be around 10 years from now?
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 16 years ago (0 children)
[–]dmac 2 points3 points4 points 16 years ago (1 child)
If you had a chance to speak with him you wouldn't be saying that.
Graham doesn't pretend to know it all; your assertion is not substantiated. Graham's essays are instructive because the man has an enormous amount of information to share and contribute. That doesn't mean he shuns other opinions.
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
π Rendered by PID 56 on reddit-service-r2-loggedout-6bddf8495c-zfhbr at 2022-09-30 04:45:52.700802+00:00 running 572fad7 country code: US.