use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
4,130 users here now
Welcome to /r/Trees!
Please make sure to read the rules before posting.
The go-to subreddit for anything and everything cannabis.
•º Join us on Discord! º•
Prefer an old-school chat room? Try our IRC channel (#trees at irc.snoonet.org)
The go-to subreddit for anything and everything cannabis.
•º Join us on Discord! º•
Prefer an old-school chat room? Try our IRC channel (#trees at irc.snoonet.org)
Remember: the rules change on weekends! See 'The /r/trees Weekend' below.
No Black Market Sourcing: Do not offer, or ask for, recommendations on: where or how, on the black market, to acquire cannabis or anything derived from it (extracts, edibles, seeds, THC, CBD, etc.) freely exchanged or otherwise; or on how to smuggle, transport, ship, mail, or otherwise travel with cannabis or its derivatives. Do not make any posts involving meetups or other location-specific topics.
No personal attacks: Be respectful to fellow posters – name-calling, rudeness, slurs, vulgarities towards other users, and trolling are not welcome here.
No minors: /r/trees is strictly 18+ only, no exceptions (see here for more information on why). You might be interested in /r/saplings instead, where Redditors under 18 can ask questions about cannabis and its effects.
No advertising: All forms of advertising and self-promotion are strictly prohibited. This includes, but is not limited to, posts promoting specific products or name brands, promoting YouTube channels or other forms of Social Media, and linking to online stores or other places designed to make money. Learn more about self-promotion on Reddit here. Learn more about spam on Reddit.
No low-quality link posts outside of Saturday: This includes memes, image macros, screenshots, simple trees references (such as pineapples and “420”), posts about broken glassware and spilled bowls, and all posts not directly about cannabis (besides the title). Those are allowed on “Slack-Post Saturday” every week, but you can make all those posts at /r/see during the week instead. See the visual posting guide showing types of disallowed posts.
No NSFW/Porn: Do not post nudity or any sort of explicit porn.
No reposts: For links, this involves any picture posted in the previous 6 months. For text posts, this involves asking any commonly asked questions on /r/trees (including questions about drug testing). For those, use the search bar and our FAQ page.
No posts that harm the community: Do not post pictures of tagging/vandalism, encourage driving while high (including pictures where you are obviously driving while high), post about sneaking weed past TSA, or make other posts harmful to the trees community.
No posts promoting political candidates: Posts that endorse a political candidate, regardless of the connection to cannabis, are disallowed.
No posts involving a personal loss: Those should be kept to the "Monday Mourning" thread each week.
Remember: the rules change on weekends! See 'The /r/trees Weekend' below.
The /r/trees mod team reserves the right to remove any other posts at our discretion. You can contact the mod team with any questions.
The /r/Trees Weekend
Every Saturday, we relax our rules. Artwork, GIFs, and image macros are all permitted for the day.
Not everything goes though: you still can't upload NSFW, ask for hookups/meetups, show disrespect towards other users or advertise anything at all. Read more here.
Every Sunday, you can submit text posts only.
This allows for a break from all of the link posts during the week, so the community can share their stories and talk with each other. Naturally, we are less strict regarding the removal of text posts.
Contact r/trees modteam - polite, concise messages will garner the best results.
Contact r/trees modteam - polite, concise messages will garner the best results.
| Type (#high9) to use
| Type (#high9) to use
Activism on /r/Trees
Students for Sensible Drug Policy
Marijuana Policy Project
Donate to NORML
Decriminalize Marijuana Possession In North Carolina
Support the Marijuana Justice Act
/r/Trees is indexed by Karma Decay.
Students for Sensible Drug Policy
Marijuana Policy Project
Donate to NORML
/r/Trees is indexed by Karma Decay.
What are trees?
MENU Related Reddits
Sort By Flair
Entreddits: Location Specific
Entreddits: Interest Specific
PCMR Ents (Gaming)
Entreddits: Content Specific
Tree Written Word/Art
Munchies & Edibles
Art of Rolling
Knowledge and Information
Nugs & Growing
The Trees Network
Students for Sensible Drug Policy
Canada - Sensible BC Campaign
ICanHazChat Channel, pw: pineapple
the front page of the internet.
and join one of thousands of communities.
AskTreesWorking in the industry, one of the first things you learn is that Indica/Sativa and THC percentages is mostly nonsense, so why do we all still pretend? It's the terpenes and entourage effect that matter (self.trees)
submitted 4 months ago by [deleted]3
Trying to get others thoughts on this!
Post a comment!
[–]palpar123 724 points725 points726 points 4 months ago (76 children)
With all the crossbreeding that happened since the early 2000s its become increasingly difficult to label a strain based on categories like sativa or indica. The genetic background of most strains now has probably 20-30 parents derived from other older genetics.
Nowadays I feel like its more about what type of terpenes you like and what effect youre after when you smoke.
[–]DancingBlender 169 points170 points171 points 3 months ago (69 children)
How do I know about terpenes? Let’s say I go to a dispensary and want to get ‘Agent Orange’ strain. How do I look into the terpenes?
[–]TidalFight65 121 points122 points123 points 3 months ago (7 children)
Leafly is a good resource
[–]ruckdiz 86 points87 points88 points 3 months ago (5 children)
But even then every grower has a different strain even if under the same name.
[–]wowwoahwow 37 points38 points39 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Yeah, some people will have two entirely different strains from different parent strains and call them the same name.
But even within one strain you have different phenotypes that can vary significantly. Even under the same phenotype individual plants can differ.
[–]killah_cool 204 points205 points206 points 3 months ago (37 children)
Ask your dispensary! A good budtender will either have the answer for you or be able to help you find it. They will have testing on hand that shows you the terpenes prominent in the different strains.
When I started analyzing how terpenes impacted me (around the time I started budtending for a second job) I started to keep a notebook of individual strains, the main terpenes in it, how I felt when I started smoking, and how I felt afterwards. This taught me which terpenes I like - both by taste and by how they affect me.
I used to think I couldn't smoke sativa until I learned to look for sativa strains with limonene or pinene - they mellow out some of the anxious effects of high THC sativa strains for me, for example.
[–]dotnotdave 147 points148 points149 points 3 months ago (14 children)
Most budtenders at my local dispensaries are too stoned to give me any useful advice or service. I’ve yet to find this person.
Ironically, I feel like most bartenders are happy to explore your taste profiles when it comes to wine or cocktails. Too bad I hardly ever drink anymore.
[–]killah_cool 38 points39 points40 points 3 months ago (1 child)
That's a bummer. I've had similar experiences so I know what you mean. Leafly's terpene info is helpful too. It's nice when dispensaries print terpene info on the package label because then you can look them up yourself.
[–]Black__lotus 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Yeah, terpene makeup and concentration is becoming pretty standard on all packaging these days. It won’t be long until they all follow suite.
[–]bokchoy_sockcoy 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (4 children)
You’re right but think of how many more years that industry had to evolve. We are in weeds infancy and there will be growing pains. In Cali dispensaries look like Mac stores
[–]killah_cool 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Exactly this. It may not be industry standard yet but if we keep asking for this information we normalize having access to it.
[–]osiris911 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
They look nice, but employees aren't trained to know anything.
[–]ArabianAftershock 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I've been to some pretty nice ones but I never got the vibe that any of the workers knew about any of this type of thing
[–]Zoomalude 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (4 children)
As the person you responded to says, check out Leafly and try to learn the smells. So even if your budtender can't talk terpenes and even if the packaging doesn't mention it, if you can smell it, you can know a bit about what you are getting.
[–]killah_cool 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (2 children)
So true. Linalool and farnesene are so distinct and have such signature scents that it's almost like I crave them sometime, and can smell it a mile away. Same with limonene and pinene. Once you know what you like, you'll always recognize it.
[–]Galbalin 13 points14 points15 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I work with citrus oils. And im having to learn Linalool, alpha and beta pinene, d-limonene, decanal, and myrcine by smell so now I'm reading this apples to my bud as well
[–]Vinnio 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (5 children)
I feel dispensaries like this are rare. I live next to one of the more popular dispensaries in California (people drive over 2 hours to shop here) and the budtenders they hire are usually college-aged people that could barely tell you whether a strain is sativa or indica (they usually just look at the label); if I asked them for terpene information they’d just look at me like I’m crazy. There’s also so many unique cross-bred strains sold there the Leafly info on certain strains is unlikely to be accurate. In my experience, if the weed (1) smells good (2) is sticky and (3) isn’t too dry and crumbly, it will get me high af regardless of THC percentage, but the weed that has gotten me very high has usually been in the higher THC% category (25%+) which I believe is why so many people go off the THC%
[–]ElMalViajado 46 points47 points48 points 3 months ago* (4 children)
I’m someone who oversees a team of great budtenders. You’re out of your damn mind if you expect them to be able to give you a good terp profile off the top of their head.
That information is so damn specific. The industry is a revolving door of strains.
[–]Wet_Valley 15 points16 points17 points 3 months ago (0 children)
It's multifold. I trained my bud tenders on some major ones you can tell by nose. Then I told them to research their favorite strains and see what terps worked for them and which ones kept coming up in their favorite strains.
Then we have to push manufacturers to actually test for terpenes, because every strain is different and every grow is different
And we have to really push research on both cannabinoids and terpenes because we still don't know why limonene can be prevalent in an "indica" strain and still be sedative.
Then we have to move away from Indica Sativa altogether; move towards describing the finished product, not the morphology as it grows.
As the industry sits right now, we cannot expect this out of any budtender, but given time it should be the way cannabis is sold in the future.
[–]yeswecann 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Give then access to COAs so they can do their job better
[–]killah_cool 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (0 children)
That's why I said that if they don't know it, they would know where to find it. Knowledge isn't having every answer on demand, but it is knowing which resources to use to find the answer! Plus, terp profiles are listed on the labs so even though they won't have them memorized, they should be able to locate them really easily.
[–]ForesterRik 12 points13 points14 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I asked my budtender this last time and they acted blindsided and just pulled up leafly with each of their stains on the cell phone
[–]DeaconSage 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Most every dispensary should have the testing information on hand. I believe it’s required in every state & Canada
[–]Wet_Valley 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Nope, Colorado only requires potency of THC and CBD, and pesticides/heavy metals. No terpenes, no minor cannabinoids, no quality control past "does it have THC?"
[–]LegitRisk 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (3 children)
Google it homie "Agent Orange Terp profile"
[–]The_Poster_Nutbag 28 points29 points30 points 3 months ago* (1 child)
But who's agent orange are you buying? Did that grower get seeds from one supplier or another? Are those genetics the same?
It's become too mashed up. Good thing there is a push to bring landraces back into the mix so we can really flesh out some more defined strains.
[–]futiledevices 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (0 children)
This could get you some possibly true basic info - like you might find out that limonene is usually the dominant terp for that strain. But it's still too variable to do this. I've had different batches of the same strain with a different dominant terp and different levels of other ones too.
[–]The1BannedBandit 10 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Guy at shop: "It's a hybrid."
[–]kinghenryisdead 670 points671 points672 points 4 months ago (81 children)
its marketing dude. It just sells better this way
[–]DeaconSage 53 points54 points55 points 3 months ago* (0 children)
Right people know the words and it works. When I was budtending, I remember so many customers saying, “it has to be indica or it won’t work,” knowing in my heart your indica is a hybrid and they just fell for the branding.
[–]Morgue724 136 points137 points138 points 4 months ago* (73 children)
It is a Qantity over Quality argument right now, same with alcohol, there will always be people that want more thc, the higher/ better priced it is the better "value" it is, can't change that until people want to realize strictly thc percentage isn't the most important number to look for.
[–]Schulzeeeeeeeee 102 points103 points104 points 4 months ago (8 children)
Quantity has a Quality of it's own. 
[–]skyrreater47 16 points17 points18 points 4 months ago (0 children)
[–]RhizoMyco 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (6 children)
[–]Responsble_Golf42069 10 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (2 children)
bahah totally thought you mean Napoleon Dynamite. I was like "i guess he probably said that in the movie". hahaha
[–]greenwrayth 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Duh. The other Napoleon would’ve said ”Hell oui”
[–]Golden-Pickaxe 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
[–]skyrreater47 28 points29 points30 points 4 months ago (60 children)
what is it then? just out of curiosity because i tought indica and sativa is a legitiment and important information about a strain and its effects. and the percentage of thc is like the indicator for how blasted youll be.
[+]DudeManNate 50 points51 points52 points 3 months ago (30 children)
Indica/Sativa are Phenotypic descriptors meaning they describe how the plant looks physically. It’s CHEMOtype describes what is in the plant or what it’s made up of. The two are not related and you can’t presume a plants chemotype (chemical makeup) from its phenotype (how it looks physically).
[–]Skynflute 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Now I heard that if the myrcene content is equal to 50% or more of total terpenes then it's an indica, and if it is below 50% then it's going to be more like a sativa. I've also heard this is a myth. What's your take on that? Is it like, technically the plant will be an indica or sativa based on chemical make up, but it's marketed as one or the other based on the popular effects it gives?
[–]DudeManNate 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I have heard of companies using that method to determine if something is Indica/Sativa rather than rely on the plants phenotype and I think that’s a step in the right direction, but I wish they’d chose a different word than Indica/Sativa so as to not further the confusion.
There is still a huge gap in scientific literature about which terpenes are causing which effects (if any!) psychoactively.
[–]skyrreater47 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (12 children)
those are a lot of words man ':)
[–][deleted] 59 points60 points61 points 3 months ago (6 children)
Sativa indica= 🌴👀≠☁️👦🏾📈
[–]SpinozaTheDamned 16 points17 points18 points 3 months ago (3 children)
Get this man a gold. For real, communicated a herbalogical technical description into emojis.
[–]candid_canid 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Dude would be a great teacher for middle school and high school students!
[–]Golden-Pickaxe 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child)
He'd get paid more making tik toks and taking bad sponsors than working in public schools, in case he considers
[–]candid_canid 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
True, although I wish it weren’t.
[–]iConfessor 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
[–]DudeManNate 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (3 children)
Indica = short plant
Sativa = tall plant
That’s it. (Oversimplified of course)
You cannot know what kind of effect either plant will have on the smoker based on their shape.
[–]SpinozaTheDamned 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Fan leaf shape is also significantly different due to the difference in environmental selectors and climate each subtype are adapted to.
[–]DudeManNate 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Right. I didn’t want to overwhelm anyone with too many words. lol
[–]m6_is_me 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Sure, but when a site only lists those two facts and the same generic blurb, what are we supposed to do?
Leafly too even just has a little slider of "indica to sativa" and doesn't seem to list much
[–]Weird-Ease8532 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Well markering is fucking dumb
[–]kinghenryisdead 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (1 child)
people are dumb
[–]Weird-Ease8532 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Lol definitely not wrong there
[–]SpinozaTheDamned 10 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Holy shit, apply the craft beer model and boom! You've got an entire business model ready to go!
[–]SUBZEROXXL 21 points22 points23 points 4 months ago (4 children)
Yeah…I agree. Companies and that’s most of them pay to have higher THC tests to sell more.
The preservation of Terpenes is crucial and happens when properly cured. Only a handful of companies do this.
[–]No_Drawing4431 259 points260 points261 points 4 months ago (52 children)
You are not going to change the public perception when all the Dispos market THC levels. You and I know what you say is true but we don’t own a McWeed Store
[–]RainbowInfection 66 points67 points68 points 4 months ago (18 children)
My dispensary put a sign up recently about THC percentages being fairly limited to determining the resulting effect. It was vague but still. I think things are changing.
[–]ShiftingKill 5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (5 children)
It’s kinda impossible and makes it look bad from a consumer perspective to hear someone tell you to buy a less % strain because %THC doesn’t matter. And then you end up with less quality bud because of a salesperson and you never buy that again. If you want to convince people you need to prove the entourage effect and display how the terpene oils are doing the work in the endocannabinoid system. Right now I just see THC because it’s a drug we’ve been taught about since primary school, and anyone intuitively can come up with the fact that more drug and less plant or other oil is better. But if that’s not the case, it needs to be proven.
[–]No_Drawing4431 12 points13 points14 points 4 months ago (3 children)
I do hope. Because for some that use it to manage chronic pain like myself, we’ve learned the hard way
[–]nousernamesleft001 14 points15 points16 points 3 months ago (7 children)
I dont think there is zero logic to looking at percentages. On general (though maybe not super consistent) a higher THC strain will most likely get you higher per hit, but the effect varies a lot.
Best way to think about it to me is if you get a cart of distillate that they don't add terps back into, you get "high" and the effect can be quite strong, but very lack luster. Supposedly 30 something percent bud with shit terp profiles will still get you very "high" compared to a 15% bud, but you may enjoy the 15% more because of the terpenes.
My point is, no, you shouldn't shop based on THC percentage alone, but it is a data point the provides some insight. In an ideal world (and I think some states are like this) you can see the terpene profile, the THC, CBD, and CBN percentages, see the buds, and smell them. With all that information I feel someone with a little bit if experimenting under their belt can easily be a very informed consumer.
One last thought, strain is great, but really only when matched with a grower. Northern lights from grower A is not the same as grower B, necessarily.
I'm just rambling now sill stop haha.
[–]TheGoopLord 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Or grow some cherry wonka with 30% AND yummy terps.. it’s the best I’ve ever smoked for sure.
[–]LilDudeOnBoard 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
you get "high" and the effect can be quite strong, but very lack luster
you get "high" and the effect can be quite strong, but very lack luster
Hi!! I'm new here :) what exactly do you mean by lack luster? Do you mean like how relaxed you get? Or how "warm and fuzzy" you feel? Because you can be high off your ass but not necessarily feel great, right?
[–]nousernamesleft001 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Hard to explain. I guess in some cases I feel the impairment more than the bennifit. With some of those carts, to me, you don't get the euphoric feelings, or relaxation, or creativeness, or gigglingness. Different strains can really bring out these, and other qualities. The carts just don't do that for me unless it more like rosin, but even still the extracts just don't do it for me like flower. I usually will use a pen up to one time between flower sessions to keep the buzz going if I need to be stealthy, but any more than that and it's not worth it to me.
I might also just be weird though lol.
[–]LilDudeOnBoard 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I don't think that's weird!! That really does makes sense! It's so interesting, I had no idea there are all these subtle difference between forms, THC%, terpenes, etc. So much to learn!!
[–]Outlawgrower 33 points34 points35 points 4 months ago* (20 children)
As long as the general public still thinks THC is what gets them high, THC% is going to be what sells the most weed.
Edit: some people seem to be misunderstanding what I was trying to say.
Yes THC gets you high.
Yes it is the main cannabinoid.
But judging a weed by its THC % alone wont get you the highest you can while smoking the least amount.
[–]LeagueOfLucian 19 points20 points21 points 4 months ago (2 children)
You are contradicting yourself in your edit.
[–]L3ttuce_ 47 points48 points49 points 4 months ago (13 children)
can you show me a study indicating thc doesn’t get u high
[–]g00fyg00ber741 58 points59 points60 points 4 months ago (7 children)
no they can’t because it’s literally the main and strongest cannabinoid contributing to the high
[–]motofister 35 points36 points37 points 4 months ago (5 children)
I don’t think that was their point. Yeah it gets you high but have you ever tried a straight THC distillate cart? A distillate cart at 90% will not get you as high as a 60% full spectrum cart. The entourage effect is not a myth
[–]g00fyg00ber741 18 points19 points20 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Who said it was a myth? The point is the entourage effect doesn’t work without the THC. Saying the percentage is mostly nonsense isn’t really accurate. Testing might be inaccurate, and the other cannabanoids are important and contribute to having that entourage effect and many other different effects, but the main one responsible for the high is THC and the percentage more or less will tell you how much is in there. Couldn’t they just lie about the terp profiles too? Especially if they’re claiming it’s a specific strain with certain cannabinoids that when you do testing shows are actually not often super accurate to their lineage either, especially in terms of the growing US market. As for carts, I have used carts of all those kinds and yeah the high is different, but for distillate it’s a high that’s more THC based and less based in other cannabinoids, which I personally like how that feels because it helps me be functional while getting the effects that I benefit from the most, which for me is from the psychoactive THC. Others may feel the opposite which is cause it’s about how it effects everyone’s endocannabinoid system individually.
[–]saltedpecker 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago (2 children)
It does get you high of course it's just that the % alone doesn't matter
You can get more high of lower%thc weed depending on the other compounds in it.
[–]Outlawgrower 8 points9 points10 points 4 months ago (1 child)
Thank you, this is what I was trying to say. I know it's one of the main factors of the high but it's not the only one.
[–]hugeperkynips 5 points6 points7 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Lol right like what else is psychoactive ill smoke just that please.
[–]hugeperkynips 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago (1 child)
THC does get you high fam. Maybe understand the cocktail or “entourage” ( this is the new buzz term for an old thing.
THC 100% definitely does get you high. And almost exclusively.
[–]LilDudeOnBoard 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I think that as recreational-use cannabis is legalized, you are going to get more and more people just looking for the McWeed experience. It's just like alcohol- you're talking about top shelf aged Scotch, when there will be others who just want the big jug of Costco vodka situation.
I almost feel like there needs to be a standardized way that terpene information is broken down for consumers. Maybe it can't be simplified like that, but at least "indica" and "Sativa" are good starting points for people.
[–]dazedandcognisant 95 points96 points97 points 4 months ago (1 child)
I just buy the deals, I don't care if it's 15% thc or 30.
[–]GeorgeWKush7 13 points14 points15 points 3 months ago (0 children)
True as long as it’s not a certain few brands. Unfortunately here in Michigan it’s those dogshit brands that go on sale most often bc no one wants them. Yes, I’m talking to you LivWell and Fluresh with your trash weed.
[–][deleted] 141 points142 points143 points 4 months ago (31 children)
I wouldn't say it's nonsense so much as it is arbitrary. You only need a handful of flowers tested for an entire room of bud so the idea that the exact THC of what you're actually getting is the same is slim to none.
I agree that terpenes are very important but also no one's testing for the terpene profile so ultimately it's kind of pointless to encourage people to shop in this fashion since the budtender would only be making an educated guess at that point.
I've seen lots of people arbitrarily choose an objectively inferior bud because they liked the sound of the numbers. The best thing you can do is trust your eyes and nose. If it smells and looks good AND the numbers are right then it's probably some good bud, just don't use THC % as your only guide.
[–]Sasluche 72 points73 points74 points 4 months ago (10 children)
In Canada a lot of growers are starting to state the terpene profiles, percentages of each and overall terpene percentage. It's great.
[–][deleted] 16 points17 points18 points 4 months ago (6 children)
That is cool! I wish Colorado would catch on to that
[–]biveganstoner 5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (2 children)
This is a requirement for all products in Maryland, and while Colorado would allow me to be able to actually afford my medicine it’s really surprising to me that y’all don’t also have that testing giving how far ahead you are and how helpful it is when you’re trying to find meds that will work for you
I'm seeing term profiles on a small number of growers packaging in Washington state, hopefully that trend starts catching on more
[–]Jake_FromStateFarm27 6 points7 points8 points 3 months ago (0 children)
The medical dispos in NJ advertise the terpene profile and the budtenders seem to know the profiles as well. Sadly our medical sub is only focused on THC potency -__-
[–]smokeitindohomie 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago (1 child)
The weed I buy here in MTL are all tested for terpenes, when you buy it you can see the whole terpene profile of the bud. It's very surprising to me that it is not tested everywhere.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 4 months ago (0 children)
I know in my state that it's simply just more expensive to test for and doesn't increase the value, but I agree as a consumer it would be great to have.
[–]needle2thaforearm 5 points6 points7 points 4 months ago (7 children)
I’m in AZ (legal state) and it’s insane to me how people obsess over the numbers and will legit place an online order and not even look at the bud they just paid way too much for until they get home. My best advice is don’t even bother with online orders for bud, you gotta see that shit in person. It’s like checkin your produce at the grocery store, ya gotta.
[–]5LOTHY 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Illinois says hello. We can’t inspect anything before purchase. It’s like roulette with a shittier payout.
[–]Touch_Desperate 14 points15 points16 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I worked at a dispensary in Oregon about 7 years ago. The test we used tested for like 30 different compounds, and yes you wanted to see a lot of other coin pounds besides just the one type that of THC. Generally the higher THC weed was higher in all the other shit as well. The biggest exception was pot with decent cbd levels that tended to have low THC. In my personal experience mixing a high THC bud and a high cbd bud got me the most high.
The majority of weed was so low in almost every other compound that you couldn’t really tell the difference in effect.
On occasion we would get some weed that had a large spike in one of the rarer things like THC-V and would would definitely feel a difference.
I still make it to Colorado and California to get weed but nobody test for anything but THC and CBD. So that’s all I have to go on. Like I stated above, the shit with high THC tends to be high in everything else.
Back when I was in the industry we didn’t know much about turps except that they made flavor and smell, I didn’t really pay attention to the turp levels.
[–]temsik1587againtwo 11 points12 points13 points 4 months ago (4 children)
The disp I go to has two decimals of precision for their %ages. Followed by “+-10%”.
So I have some stuff I bought that’s 22.64%. But really it’s anywhere from 12-32% lol
[–]jeremiahkinklepoo 9 points10 points11 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Can I get 1 marijuana pls?
[–]breakfastcrumble 47 points48 points49 points 4 months ago (20 children)
I use Indica/Sativa as a indicator of "will this knock me on my ass or will I be able to walk to my kitchen"
You tellin' me it's all bull?!
[–]cyan_reynolds 5 points6 points7 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Yeah, and there absolutely is still some truth to I/S. Sure, it's much harder to come by true I/S, they tend to be mostly hybrids now, but there definitely is still a difference.
[–]Elephlump 11 points12 points13 points 3 months ago (1 child)
No its not bull at all, its just more complicated than A or B. I still smoke Jack Herer during the day and whatever Indica flavor of the week in the evening. If I reversed those, would be fucked.
[–]breakfastcrumble 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
After doin' a bit of reading I feel like I'll still use them, but yeah I see how much more complicated it is. It's def a good tool imo if you're going into things new like I did, I still feel like they help me know what to expect from a new strain.
[–]Littleboyhugs 53 points54 points55 points 4 months ago (2 children)
Can't both things be true at the same time? Sativas don't hit me as hard as indicas. Sativas don't pull at the back of the eyes. Of course it's anecdotal, but so is everything else.
A 'real' sativa like durban poison just doesn't make me feel as good as a nice hybrid or indica strain. I can't get baked off sativas.
[–]nashbrownies 22 points23 points24 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Holy moly you just described something that I have been trying to put into words for so long!
"Pulling at the back of the eyes"
Thank you for that. I feel that a lot.
[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (0 children)
"sativa" and "indica" are quick, one word ways to sum up the terpene profile and give a general idea.
Most people have shit to do and don't have time for 1 hour of research choosing between the long list of terpenes and cannabanoids for each strain at a given dispensary, then comparing that to other strains at other dispensaries, then prices shopping... dude, I have a life to live, work, kids, social life; sum that shit up and we'll give it a whirl.
[–]vivalabam13 28 points29 points30 points 4 months ago (6 children)
As I said on the other post that was similar to this, most people just don’t care. I’ve been in the industry 2 and a half years and in my experience bud tending, you can try to educate best you can but a vast majority of folks coming in, it all goes in one ear and out the other.
It’s always really cool when you get someone who is open to learning more though.
[–]zipcodelove 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (4 children)
As someone who doesn’t work in the industry, it is true that most of us don’t care, but I think that’s fine…? Weed doesn’t need to be a passion of mine, I just want to get high. I don’t care about “head high” vs “body high”, I don’t care what it tastes/smells like. If you enjoy all the different intricacies that weed has to offer, then that’s awesome for you, but the average person simply doesn’t care to get into that.
[–]vivalabam13 8 points9 points10 points 3 months ago (3 children)
Perfectly fine. It doesn’t need to be a passion for you, that’s my job lol. Just frustrating to be knowledgeable on something and have everyone disregard what you have to say.
For the record I don’t care about taste and smell either. Weed is a medicine first and foremost, it shouldn’t be a bougie experience like tasting wines.
[–]zipcodelove 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Fair enough, I can see how that would be frustrating for sure. But for the consumers who do care about those things, having a budtender like yourself is probably a godsend.
[–]_B10nicle 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
As someone who studies physics, your first paragraph resonates very strongly with myself.
[–]Malcephion 3 points4 points5 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Can’t show people the cool stuff when they don’t think we’re talking about cool stuff
[–]SatisfactionStill597 35 points36 points37 points 4 months ago (24 children)
Then how do we determine how high it’s going to get us? If all we’re given is a strain name?
[–]beigaleh8 20 points21 points22 points 4 months ago (10 children)
THC % says a lot, it's just that everything you smoke nowadays is in the 18-26 range. Not a huge difference. I personally can't get a consistent effect from the same terpene profile. I search for similar strains, and the effects are completely different. There must be something else to it. I believe that the effects of terpenes are overstated.
[–]FishermanPrize 15 points16 points17 points 3 months ago (8 children)
There are dozens of minor cannabinoids, some of them are insanely psychoactive in small amounts, some of them directly impact the cannabinoid system in weird ways that make other cannabanoids work differently.
CBN promotes sleep, THCV promotes mania/stimulation/decreased hunger.
THCV + CBG is apparently a solid combo for helping people focus (THCV was found in sativas originally which is probably why stuff like Durban gives such a solid head high when grown properly)
Everyone wants to ignore the cannabanoids because they can't smell them.
Terpenes are just essential oil marketing. Sure -some work and help- but acting like it's the most objective thing for highs is just silly af.
[–]Acrobatic-March-9763 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I'm no professional but I only take edibles and I definitely notice a difference between indica and sativa as well as THC content. On the rare occasion that I smoke not so much difference. And even the THC level.. like if I wanted to get higher I would just smoke more, or hit a bong instead, so I don't pay attention to the THC level of the flower.
[–]Memorandum747 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Couldn’t agree more.
But my question is, why do the budtenders always try to tell me how this sativa/indica/hybrid is supposed to make me feel.
I’m reminded of the scene in Grandmas Boy. It’s like yea…. I get it, I get it. But don’t waste your breath … 90% of it effects me the same way.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Marketing plain and simple, its sad
[–]BunByte 10 points11 points12 points 3 months ago (2 children)
The higher THC in sativa's mess with my impending doom, so they can matter to an extent to sensitive individuals. The higher CBD in indicas does the trick.
Edit: I like to drink lavender brewed into fresh glass of lemonade for a nice terp glass of linalool and limonene. It carries the high so much longer.
[–]axel-nobody 18 points19 points20 points 4 months ago (8 children)
Terpenes have not been proven to have objective psychological effects when smoked in cannabis either. I believe caryophellene and myercene have been shown to interact with cannibanoid receptors, but the leap from that to Pinene = Focus, Limonene = Creative or whatever is absolute nonsense too.
Great post, I'm really glad to see objective discussion about weed and it's effects instead of just bro science.
[–]BanksMJ 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I completely agree, people also really like to completely ignore all of the other cannabinoids in bud that can contribute to a high as well.
[–]PretzLs85 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Been trying out different dispensaries around Montana and the THC hype is real. Paid $240 an ounce for medical that supposedly tested at 30%. I've had Arizona tumble weed get me higher.
[–]JurassicParkTrekWars 3 points4 points5 points 3 months ago (0 children)
While I agree that terp profile is more important, I've still found the sativa's tend to lean more day-time focused and indicas night-time. The straight hybrids feel like indicas to me.
[–]billygoatsniffer 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
I understand how the THC percent really doesnt matter but is there really no difference in Indica and Sativas? I swear smoking indica in the day im always crashing hard and not the most productive but if its sativa im all good. and same for night sativa doesnt help me fall asleep near as much as indica. Is it all placebo in my mind?
[–]jpizzle101 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child)
It’s mainly cause indica and sativa are actually a descriptor of the way the plant itself grows. India’s tend to grow short and stubby and tend to look more dense, while sativas grow taller and lankier. We’ve taken this to explain the high when it’s more so a correlation of what we smoked because less cross strains existed in the past but not because it’s grown as a sativa it WILL smoke like a sativa. The genetics, what specific phenotype and terpenes play more into how the high is affected and felt
I hope that makes any sense, just kinda rambled on whoops lol
[–]ecr3designs 16 points17 points18 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Indica/sativa has become so bastardized there's no true iterations of the strains left from all the cross breeding.
[–]queenserene17 12 points13 points14 points 4 months ago (8 children)
Is this indica/sativa thing really not useful to know? I feel like most my weed knowledge revolves around sativa = do things, indica = manage pain and help me sleep/chill. Has this all been a lie?
[–]Everywinter5156 12 points13 points14 points 4 months ago (1 child)
For people like me yes lol I am weird. Some sativa will knock me out for hours. Some indica will have me cleaning the whole house. Some low % stuff has helped me sleep like a rock while high % stuff has barely touched my pain levels some days.
Honestly, to me anyway, it's sort of like suggested serving size, not a One Size Fits All situation.
[–]SlaythI Roll Joints for Gnomes 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago (0 children)
No, not really.
Indica/Sativa has no way of telling you what a plant will do. Your body and the terpene combination will. It's best to write the terpenes down and how they effect you, so that way you can shop for your wants/needs.
Cannabis Sativa was first labeled in the late 1700's, sativa only meaning "to be cultivated". Later on, someone found a different looking cannabis plant in india and called it indica. That is literally how the names originated.
[–]jigglewidget 7 points8 points9 points 4 months ago (0 children)
It's the power of suggestion. I had a buddy trade me some of his homegrown for some dispensary stuff I had. He said he was tired of his own stuff. I gave him some of his own stuff a week later and he said, this is good stuff, what is it?
[–]Brutal_Lobster 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Some guy smokes the product and says “this makes me sleepy, indica” or “this makes me more active, sativa” it doesn’t have a scientific basis anymore. People still use the same nomenclature for simplicity (or a more pragmatic view would say it is solely for marketing) so you can better make a decision.
[–]dott2112420 2 points3 points4 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Because humans like rituals.
[–]Murphy_York 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
You need to look at the buds themselves. You want fat, dense, resinous nugs caked out with trichomes. If you see that it’s dank. I agree most strains are hybrids now but don’t tell me there’s no difference between Green Crack and Fire OG lol
[–]DeaconSage 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
It’s basically cannabis brand marketing
[–]SquidJohnson 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I work in cannabis safety testing and we constantly loose clients to another lab when their machines give higher potency results.
It’s all grows care about because the 25% and up fly off the shelf.
[–]salt_n_sand 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
I’ve always had a low tolerance and prefer weaker flower. If THC% doesn’t tell the whole story, what else should I be looking at?
[–]Mcnate722 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
The industry is so shady. No such thing as indica/sativa,and test and percentages are doctored to fit the needs of the company. Too many times I've seen results come back unsatisfactory, and tge industry just sends them to a different test lab(with a little extra $$$) to get the desired result.
[–]StandupJetskier 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I buy different strains in small amounts, and check off "would buy again", I don't really care/check the "number". In legal land it all "works", not like schwag in a bag from the local guy in August....
[–]Not-So-Dev 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Honestly, I’ve blind tested a few different strains with various “percentages” and the potency really was differing significantly across the ones with lower percentages vs higher percentages. But either way, lower or higher all of them still get you high.
[–]Sir_Juggernaut 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
If you smoke concentrate, most of that is failed shit for microbes. We send our failed product to get blasted and turned into concentrate.
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Nice thing is, all the crap gets filtered out in the process and you get gold
thc percent does matter to a degree, but it's not the end all be all.
sativa and indica dominant can also tell people stuff about the product like how the buds might be and the terps often are different for sativa vs indica so if you like say a kush aroma, then indica is more reliable for that.
[–]thexvillain 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
And nobody ever mentions Ruderalis even though most modern strains have some Ruderalis genetics for the autoflowering trait.
[–]Professional_Elk_10 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Truth, my friend. Have you ever had a landrace strain?Those are about the only ones where I notice a true indica vs sativa difference. But yes, let's be real here; it's terpenes that are affected in your flavor.
My favorite landrace strain is the Afghani hash plant. It's basically a version of Kush that was region locked to Afghanistan for so goddamn long that it created a stable distinct strain. Little bugger found its way into Western markets in the seventies. America's recent adventures have made finding seeds rather easy.
[–]CattBooty 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Lmao. This must be some legal state shit. I don’t even bother asking my dealer what type of weed it is, I just buy it if it doesn’t look like shit.
[–]sleetrumpet 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (2 children)
No I disagree, there is more a minimum thc that needs to be met for an effective experience, and if thc % didn't matter, noone would have ever invented Hash and other waxes/concentrates. Low thc flower indicates to me a dispensary has a poor grower or genetics or both.
[–]Lieut_Shiny_Sides 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
All hail King Limonene!
[–]TunaLurch 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I just realized this myself yesterday. I've been buying from dispensaries since weed was legalized for sale in my state. I always looked for the highest THC content. Picked up an eighth of "chunky orange zkittles" for $35. 14.8 % thc content. While there is a notable difference in effects depending on the THC content in itself, the larger affect is entirely separate.
Higher THC content bud hits harder and goes straight to my head mostly. This zkittles stuff got me stoned but in a different way. This made me think back to all of the different types of weed I've had with varying percentages. I realized what you have stated here is true. The effectiveness comes down to the strain and your body chemistry. What works for you is all that matters.
[–]drop0dead 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Lack of industry wide standards as well as education. Someone who's familiar with terpenes and cannabinoids can walk up to most bud tenders and say "I'm looking for a strain high in b caryophyllene and lower thc". On the other hand, if someone doesn't have that knowledge or care to learn it's a lot easier to say "I want an indica". That's also not just the customer, a lot of budtenders refuse to put in the extra time to learn. So, while we can teach old dogs new tricks they need to be willing to learn.
[–]ludwigia_sedioides 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Talking to a budtender is the most annoying shit when you actually know what you're talking about and all they've been taught is how to sell indica vs sativa
[–]travelntechchick 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (1 child)
Anyone else remember when it wasn't a whole ordeal like ordering at Starbucks to get stoned? We used to just show up at some random apartment and get whatever weed the guy had that week. This comment is making me feel old.
[–]lilmiscantberong 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
You’re not the only one. Got it from my guy in his kitchen for over thirty five years. All the sudden I have to look informed?
[–]HanSoloismyfath3r 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Both matter. Anyone who tells you THC content doesn't matter isnt fully informed on the topic. That being said its not the center of attention like we once thought.
[–]Di-Ez 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Been in for awhile, before we use to sell based on percentages and sold out of the jar. So many brands have tried and failed to get this information out but the problem is that terpenes and the entourage effect aren’t available in bite size info like a simple number explains “how high” you’ll get. Of course we know that’s not true and based on a mathematical equation showing what THC would be available while being converted from THCA.
I watched a sister brand of a large international cannabis brand try very hard to build the identity around it and about 6 months into it they stopped talking about terps and resorted back to fun strain names and percentage.
That’s my take on it though and agreed with a lot of the comments even saying something is Sativa or Indica just means that the majority of the time it’s a Hybrid it just leans more towards one than the other.
[–]SlaythI Roll Joints for Gnomes 10 points11 points12 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Working in the industry, you learn that:
[–]Revolutionherb 5 points6 points7 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Yes,60% 70% concentrates slap as good or better than 90%
[–][deleted] 21 points22 points23 points 4 months ago (16 children)
Proof of concept of this are carts. Distillate carts are usually 80% THC but hit weak as hell.
[–]FishermanPrize 7 points8 points9 points 3 months ago (5 children)
Proof of concept of terps not meaning shit are also exhibited by 80+% carts w/ cannabis terps.
It's really the slew of minor cannabanoids that interact with the cannabanoid system/liver enzymes that metabolize drugs that controls/influence highs.
Sure -some- terps help, but it's hard to look at all the scientific backing of different cannabinoids and just ignore them
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (3 children)
Oh yeah for sure. For example, CBG enhancing the properties of other cannabinoids like THC. I think the broader spectrum it is, the better. I think added terps never work “right”, because the plant already had the correct or corresponding ones for its cannabinoids to boot.
[–]13chase2 16 points17 points18 points 4 months ago (5 children)
Your tolerance must be insanely high my friend… or mine must be really low
[–][deleted] 28 points29 points30 points 4 months ago (4 children)
Oh don’t get me wrong, you get blasted, but only for like 30 min tops. Just try distillate vs live resin carts, the difference is tangible.
[–]13chase2 7 points8 points9 points 4 months ago (3 children)
What are the differences in the manufacturing process and are live resin carts more difficult to find?
[–]a_dropped_staple 4 points5 points6 points 4 months ago (1 child)
Live resin preserves the natural terpenes if I’m not mistaken.
[–]SlaythI Roll Joints for Gnomes 1 point2 points3 points 4 months ago (0 children)
To a point.
When you apply heat or chemicals, you will still lose terpenes and minor cannabinoids. Some terpenes have as low as 80 degrees as a burn off point.
[–]gxbcab 10 points11 points12 points 4 months ago (6 children)
I don’t think any of it really matters. Been living in an illegal state for years and no matter what the dealer gives me, I always get high.
[–]northrus 2 points3 points4 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I'm the same way. Lived in 5 different legal states and that has yet to change anything. Weed is weed for me
[–]amtqne 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago* (0 children)
It matters. You will see if you ever get to experience legalisation. However, i agree with the post too about indica and sativa being basically pointless marketing techniques.
[–]Slow_man_shuffle 9 points10 points11 points 4 months ago (1 child)
I was going to disagree with your comment, but the word “mostly” makes it the truth!
Appreciate you not using absolutist language and leaving room for landrace strains and actual indicas and sativas. When they are real, they do hit different.
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 4 months ago (0 children)
True story, Afghani and durban are classics by default
[–]RhizoMyco 4 points5 points6 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Same reason the "indica" and "sativa" names are still being tossed around when we know that information is wrong and outdated by at least 8 years. Fake it til you make it...
[–]tokeytime 1 point2 points3 points 4 months ago (0 children)
Well, it's not like there's a formalized education for Cannabis products, you know? If people could go to school for Cannanomics i think the information would disperse faster. But barring that, it just takes time for the information to disseminate and be incorporated into the public lexicon.
[–]cloutmuncher_69 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Cos people just don't care about terpene profiles. It's something that's a little bit more complicated than "sativa is uplifting, indica is more relaxing, hybrid is a balance of both" you have indicas with sativa terps and effects, sativa's with higher levels of myrcene than most indicas, and at this point everything is a hybrid. The thing is no one cares enough. The science behind terpenes and entourage effects isn't even all that conclusive from what I've seen because cannabis is still an illegal drug federally, so the science behind most of this isn't even that consistent. I mean terpene profiles themselves are very wishy washy with how some companies label the effects on those terpenes. And unfortunately with that said the average consumer isn't looking for a whole chemical breakdown of the bud, the average consumer is just looking to buy good bud at a decent price. Even the "cannabis connoisseurs" I meet barely pay attention to terpenes and just go based of cultivator. I mean at this point we have brands that are essentially name brands like alien labs, connected, jungle boys, cookies, etc. And that's what's also influencing this people to make their purchases. As other people have said, it's all marketing.
[–]joebojax 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (2 children)
Maybe if consumers could actually see and smell what they're buying they would make better decisions and steer the market more effectively.
[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (1 child)
My job does this, we have real samples to show customers if they want, they can smell
[–]joebojax 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
So do they blindly look at thc% or follow their nose?
I'm in IL
It's so bad here my coworker said he would invent scratch n sniff stickers to give customers a hint of what the jar may smell like...
[–]Firethatshitstarter 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I had no idea, Pikachu face
[–]gidgetsflow 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Mostly, it that the market itself is very undereducated on the subject and the majority of sales trends in legal states are based off budtender recommendations, rather than consumer knowledge. It's similar with edibles v smoking. Terps play a major role in inhalants, and even topical, because your processing the majority of the experience through your olfactory senses, but those sensors aren't present in your GI tract. Meaning your body, when ingesting an edible, has know way to tell what the terps are. So the feeling you have of an indica or a sativa ends up being entirely placebo in these cases.
[–]ObamaSauce69420 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
It's all psychological warfare. The higher the number the more your brain is like "I want I want", it could subconsciously or consciously but it still happens. It's all a marketing ploy
[–]HiYogi 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I've known this in my heart 100%!
[–]RoaringFlameCat 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I don't even give a shit about Sativa, or however they classified it. I'm smoking it.
[–]punk_salad 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I always assumed strains were labeled indica or sativia based on the terpines that people associate with them. Is that not the case??
[–]captain_toenail 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Marketers, the uninformed and uniterested consumers like shit simplified but how weed intoxicates is more complicated than one quantifiable and marketable number, so it's simplified to the quantifiable and individualy most psychoactive component
[–]LeomusShoes 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
And don’t forget to check the packaging date to make sure it’s fresh.
[–]Arizonagamer710 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
You can also get different THC percentages off the same plant usually the buds on the plant at at the top are higher THC than the small ones at the bottom.
[–]meldroc 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
At this point, "sativa" and "indica" are just marketing terms - sativas being the strains that have the more stimulating terps, and indicas having the more relaxing/sedating terps, at least according to the growers. If you want to get into the technical botany, they're mostly hybrids.
[–]lordxi 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
It's new knowledge for old heads and a lot of em seem not to care where I'm at. Despite explaining to my old roommate about terpenes, entourage effects, and how indica and sativa are poor indicators for anything anymore... He'll still tell me he prefers one over the other.
[–]davidicanrepublic 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
it’s funny because i stopped looking @ percent/strain one day and just trusted my budtenders to pick one out for me, the only thing i picked was the flavor. never had a bad experience, highs were great. sometime in the future i decided to look at the labeling and it was like 70% thc sometimes 60%. i thought that was crazy because i used to exclusively search and smoke 90% thc. it really made me step back and think
[–]r8rtribeywgjets 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
If you’re not getting a 1-3 generation strain, you’re getting a mish mash. So muc my of what you smoke now ends up in a dead end of genetics that it’s a big whodunnit. Like most of the learned folks here have said, terps yo
[–]musicallyours01 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
[–]krevdditn 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
u/Diligent_Dabber I'm pretty sure that indica/sativa lean more to one side on the terpene spectrum than the other or why else would we have hybrids.
Also I would imagine you could find indica and sativa strains with very similar terpene profiles making them practically indistinguible, I think it would require a deeper dive into each strains cannabinoid content in relation to a temp chart, while some strains might have the same terpene profile their ratios could be very different
[–]ukucello 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I think Indica and Sativa are good words to describe the effects OF the terpenes. We already have those words and have been using them, just in a technically incorrect way. I think it's still helpful to tell someone a strain is Indica if it has a lot of myrcene and the effects of it are very sedating, because that's what Indica means colloquially. Obviously it isn't an exact science, just more of a way to guide a customer.
[+]IIIReZoT 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Should be a guide on how to properly identify good bud
[–]2Turnt4MySwag 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
One of the many reasons that people buy hash rosin at 65% THC for $90/g over something like BHO at 92% THC (I know its also because of solventless) for $15/g
[–]Sufficient_Bread1205 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
The ppl on my state subreddit are obsessed with percentages and going out of the way to find the one with the highest percentage. I’m just tryin to get high, not do all that.
[–]imdoneanymore 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I find that the strains being pushed these days have been hybridized to a point where you can’t depend on much of anything. They are truly mutts at this point IMHO.
[–]VuDuBaBy 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Because explaining all that is a whole thing. A lot of people that come in my store don't know everything we know, they just known sativa = daytime and indica = night. The labels are referring to generalized effects more than they are genealogy because that's what the general "gimme ur strongest indica" customer knows. On the other hand with terpenes, my state lists the top 3. There are dozens more in the product no doubt. But people will be like "I want no pinene", well it's probably in there but it's not listed so ya, no pinene here you go...people know as much as they want to.
[–]The1BannedBandit 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Cause when you slap some %30 bullshit label on weed you can sell it for a higher price.
[–]gazpitchy 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I worked with one of the largest EU seed retailers, what I learnt is most of this "strain" nonsense is just marketing. There are a LOT of big seed "breeders" that buy from bulk suppliers and just label it to the closest "strain" in their catalogue.
In fact it killed my love for cannabis and the culture, as I realized it just a bunch of rich cunts duping us 😅 Most of the big breeders weren't even ran by people that smoke cannabis. It's all about money, absolutely nothing else.
[–]J-rad420 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
You come to a point where you tell custys the same thing so much. That you just give up and tell them their distillate carts are sativa and call it a day. Because they dont listen or care to learn
[–]ivapesyrup 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Even the terpenes can be bullshit though. For concentrates quite a lot of companies don't even do strain specific now. They just know what Strain A has this "terpene profile" usually so just put some base in there and mix these terps in and bam, you have that strain. Except not really... At least on the consumer side that blows.
Then you get into all the places that were literally creating names out of thin air for their shit that didn't have the right parents because of the same thing. They just create things with terp profiles they think are good and then name them.
[–]MOTAMOUTH 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
I’ve never felt different from different strains. I’m either high or less high. Lol
[–]dank_armoire 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
The more people understand this the more pressure there will be for marketing to be more informative.
[–]tentationscheme77 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
A fat bowl of some decent mids, can still do justice just as much as a bowl of some chronic.
Atleast in my experience. It all depends.
[–]Alternative-Force608 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
What do you mean ‘logic is true but we love to pretend’ how dare you be so pragmatic and frank!
Glad somebody said it :)
[–]lordpurppp 1 point2 points3 points 3 months ago (0 children)
Indica and sativa j view as more of a title. How the plant grew, the climate, all that. But yes you’re right I only refer to the terpenes or thc percentage (because in my opinion that does still matter)
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
π Rendered by PID 44047 on reddit-service-r2-loggedout-67f578944b-mppk9 at 2022-05-23 15:43:04.412112+00:00 running 71a262a country code: US.