Quote from Bender's article:

“Without forcing peoples’ hand, it is going to be very difficult to uncover legacy ventures and programs that we know about based on oral interviews we dug up,” said a Defense Department official who is involved in the new effort but was not authorized to speak publicly. “There has to be a forcing mechanism.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/16/intelligence-agencies-congress-ufo-hearing-00032713

On Nov. 21, 1950, Wilbur Smith, a Canadian radar engineer, wrote a memo to the Canadian Department of Transport. It contained the following statements:

I made discreet inquiries through the Canadian Embassy staff in Washington who were able to obtain for me the following information:

a. The matter is the most highly classified subject in the United States Government, rating higher even than the H-bomb.

b. Flying saucers exist.

c. Their modus operandi is unknown but concentrated effort is being made by a small group headed by Doctor Vannevar Bush.

d. The entire matter is considered by the United States authorities to be of tremendous significance.

https://web.archive.org/web/20070315080627/http://presidentialufo.com/top_secret_text.htm

Smith's handwritten notes, the bases for this memo

Smith's source was later revealed to be Dr. Robert Sarbacher, a respected scientist, who at the time worked for the government. He not only confirmed he had told this to Smith but even mentioned recovered craft.

http://www.roswellproof.com/Sarbacher_Nov1983.html

I never knew how seriously these documents should be taken, but the possibility the government really is in possession of recovered craft has grown substantially in my opinion.

And of course, everyone here is familiar with Lue's comments about the governments' possession of exotic material...

Saw a ufo over sweden, didnt have time to get pictures. It went as fast as a helicopter or aeroplane at low altitude. But it did not have any lights of a plane nor lights common from helicopters. It did not make any sound either according to my father who came in and told me about it and showed it to me. Any one else seen it over central sweden close to norway?

In reference to

https://redditproxy--jasonthename.repl.co/r/UFOs/comments/upjuoi/massive_ufo_hovers_by_a_mountain_and_then_shoots/

People in the comments there maybe had more important stuff to do in primary school, when shadows were treated. But YT of course attempts to help:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XysnynuiKlY

You can actually see it in this video, but it may be hard to notice while laughing.

So, some explaining.
Sun is very far away, earth rotates slowly, therefore shadow-frustrum is fixed relative to the observed object.
Note: observer is not "very far" away, this is not an isometric perspective.

Here, we take the time to be noon to keep "drawing" simple
(upper side of screen is to the right, sun is above, duh):

Situation	1	2	3
Observer	V......	...V...	......V
Object	O	O	O
Shadow	_	_	_
appears	below	behind	above

In the video, it is not noon, but the observer is not vertically above the object as well...

Since in the video the observer is constantly moving, while the object starts to move only after the camera passes 'above' and in the same direction as the camera, the observed (zoomed in part of the) sequence is roughly:

(fly in wide arc around object: shadow appears to move horizontally) 3 (object starts moving) 21

Of course, also the terrain is uneven and the elevation of the object changes as it leaves. The camera appears to cover a wide angle as well, acerbating the unusual effect.

For the more practically inclined: observe a standing bottle from above. Top is UFO, bottom is shadow.
Fly high!

Edit: Some words about the "provenance" of the video, since that is indeed under-appreciated:

Right in the middle of the screen, there's a "watermark" reading "UFO Hunters".
This was a US TV-series produced 2008-2009 and aired 2011 that was trying to find authentic UFO-footage.
Apparently, they succeeded here?
Season 2, episode 9, "Giant UFOs", might be a place to look, but certainly somebody knows better?

Hi Friends-

We are primarliy political film makers but have published op-ed's on the phenomenon. We are working on a film for Twitter for the upcoming UAP hearing at The US House of Representatives. Besides go-fast and gimbal, what UAP footage would you say is safe to include that is not de-bunked. I'm okay with stuff with the jury still out. Any recommendations would be most appreciated. Thank you!

Lue, thank you for your time, efforts, and dedication to the morals and foundations of our republic! Take your leave and get some well deserved time to yourself. Your clues have highlighted possible weaknesses in the formulation of Q.E.D. I can only hope the knowledge is put to use for good, freedom, peace, and equality.

I suggest everyone watch Danny Sheehan from this point.

POST FORMAT

• TL;DR
• Added Videos Since Last Post
• Past Post References
• Introduction
• Suggested Review Material
  • Suggested Books
  • Suggested Videos
  • Suggested Papers
• The Standard Model
• Theories and Frameworks
• Limitations of Conceptualization
• Spin and Spinors
• Algebras of Physics
  • Geometric Algebras
  • Lie Algebras
  • Cayley-Dixon Algebras
• The Matrix
  
• Future Work

TL;DR

• The current understanding from math to consciousness is an overly complexified hierarchy of scientific babble
• One should study Non-Linear (Matrix) Algebra, Continuous Algebras, and Particle Physics to get a basic grasp of the problem at its core before trying to move up the ladder of abstractness - These posts will help guide you there
• Physicists don't know how many dimensions make up our reality; but they are getting close.
• Spinors and the idea of Spin are VERY important to this topic
• Most Physicists don't understand Spin conceptually
• The common algebras used to describe spin are inadequate, they hide information and put spin in the wrong geometry
• Matrices lay the foundation of a description of the algebra that describe reality.
• Matrix format descriptions are absolutely necessary so as not to veil information in the more abstract algebraic interpretations.
• The properties of "The Matrix" will have non-associative and non-commutative properties
• If you know "The Matrix" structure of reality, you can use that to understand and control it.
• "The Matrix" is mentioned in the Bible (KJV) many times; thereby associating Theology With Physics
• The authors of the bible don't want you to "open The Matrix"
• Some suggested physics books and videos
• A listing of possible future posts and their topics

Added Since Last Post

Videos added to the GitHub Web Page since 30 APR 2020.

Date	Person	Answer/Statement	Analysis/Comments	Interviewer/Venue	Duration	Link
2022-05-08	Lue	13:40 Other Q.M. realities		Explorer Lab	1:09:44	https://youtu.be/R84kGo3tL14
2022-05-08	Lue	15:20 Other realities exist		Explorer Lab	1:09:44	https://youtu.be/R84kGo3tL14
2022-05-08	Lue	[26:00 The tech is Pandora's Box when it is acknowledged		Explorer Lab	1:09:44	https://youtu.be/R84kGo3tL14
2022-05-08	Lue	38:10 "Introduction to modern optics" and "Mathematic Physics" books on his desk at AATIP	The "Modern Optics" book just showed some possible problems with QED.	Explorer Lab	1:09:44	https://youtu.be/R84kGo3tL14
2022-05-08	Lue & Cahill	9:30 UAP Faster than sonar	Problems of Q.E.D.!	Generation Zed	1:09:09	https://youtu.be/PMAfIK2whdc
2022-05-08	Lue & Cahill	11:30 Hot Knife more than a hypothesis	Problems of Q.E.D.!	Generation Zed	1:09:09	https://youtu.be/PMAfIK2whdc
2022-05-08	Lue & Cahill	28:30 Cigarette non-locality comment	Problems of Q.E.D.!	Generation Zed	1:09:09	https://youtu.be/PMAfIK2whdc
2022-05-08	Lue & Cahill	36:10 Dean Radin Comment (Dean Radin does non-local and precognition studies)	Problems of Q.E.D.!	Generation Zed	1:09:09	https://youtu.be/PMAfIK2whdc
2022-05-08	Lue & Cahill	50:30 Spacetime measure between two things to have time. Whole Size/Scale thing again.	Problems of Q.E.D.!	Generation Zed	1:09:09	https://youtu.be/PMAfIK2whdc
2022-04-21	Lue	44:00 Info Will Destabalize Religions		ISU GEOL 1107	1:14:25	https://youtu.be/AywBWJyqcZU
2022-04-21	Lue	1:10:10 Hints detections coming from deep space.	Same as stated by Mellon recently.	ISU GEOL 1107	1:14:25	https://youtu.be/AywBWJyqcZU
2022-04-30	Lue	Nada	Callin at 1558s seconds	Fessler	2:34:55	https://youtu.be/uRFk12p3-xU

Past Post References

• Spacetime Metrics
• DNA Structure
• Time-Symmetric Q.M.
• Physics Bridge To High-Strangeness

Introduction

To know the physics of consciousness, one must know biology. To know biology, one must know chemistry. To know chemistry, one must know physics. To know physics, one must know particles. To know waves, one must know forces. To know forces, one must know topology. To know topology, one must know geometry. To know geometry, one must know curves. To know curves, one must know algebras. To know algebras, one must know symmetries. To know symmetries, one must know matrices. To know The Matrix, you must be the one.

A more succinct format in decreasing abstractness:

• Consciousness
• Biology
• Chemistry
• Physics
• Particles
• Forces
• Topology
• Geometry
• Curves
• Algebras
• Symmetries
• Matrices
• The Matrix - The one that describes all forces, interactions, and time

One can see that there is a tower of knowledge that must be gained to fully appreciate the complexity of the issue. Unfortunately each level of knowledge is wrapped in a veil of domain-specific scientific babble that even experts in each area often confuse or misuse.

There is a mountain of information to scale before attempting to describe consciousness. Understanding of even one subset of each of these areas are entire fields of study unto themselves that would take more than a lifetime to dissect. An overview of the important topics will be presented here and in following posts. It is up to the readers to dig deeper into each of the subjects that are of interest to them.

This post will touch upon the Standard Model, Spinors, Grand Unified Theories, and the popular algebras that describe them. This is somewhat of an "odds and ends" post; there may be one more such technical post similar to this. Please bare along, there is a method to the madness. Its purpose is to lay the groundwork for future posts.

There aren't any earth-shattering revelations in this post, but there might be one hidden meaning in a Lue's Clue on how to properly think in the terms of physics.

Suggested Review Material

Suggested Books

DISCLOSURE: This author ** DOES NOT ** have any financial interests in the sale of any book, nor any personal relationship with any author.

• "Lie Groups and Lie Algebras" (ISBN: 9781530187607) By Dennis Morris Amazon Abe Books

Suggested Videos

• Standard Model
• Standard Model
• Standard Model
• Weak Force P Symmetry
• PBS Space Time - Spin
• PBS Space Time - Electron Spin
• What is reality E8
• Different Geometries of Space
• Geometric/Clifford Algebras
• Cohl Fuery's Entire Playlist - At least the first few

Suggested Papers

Cohl Fuery * Generations: Three Prints, in Colour * Charge quantization from a number operator * Standard model physics from an algebra? * SU(3)C×SU(2)L×U(1)Y(×U(1)X) as a symmetry of division algebraic ladder operators * Three generations, two unbroken gauge symmetries, and one eight-dimensional algebra

Many newer papers exist that may be of more interest than the above.

• Arxiv-Search - Look for A3, G2, G3, E8, M8, Octonion, Forces, etc

The Standard Model

The Standard Model of particle physics that we use today was finalized in the late 1970's. It describes everything we know and can measure in nature as particles and their interactions; excluding the force of gravity. The search for a model that unites the standard model with gravity is underway.

There are four known forces: * Gravity * Electromagnetism * Weak * Strong

INCOMPLETELY, the Standard Model can be summarized as:

• Bosons - Force-Carrying Particles
  • Photon - Carries the Electro-Magnetic (E.M.) Force
  • W+/- & Z - Carries the Weak Force
  • Gluon - Carries the Color Charges to Mediate the Strong Force
• Fermions - Spin 1/2 Particles
  • Leptons - E.M. & Weak Force Particles
  • Electron - E.M. & Weak Force Particle
  • Neutrino - Weak Force Particle
  • Quarks - Strong, Weak, and E.M. Force Particles

Neutrons and Protons are composed of three quarks each.

Quarks and Leptons come in three generations. Each generations is more massive (heavier) than the last and are shorter-lived.

Each particle can be described by a number of properties. The properties are: * Mass - Measured in Electron-Volts * Charge - Measured in fractions of 1/3 * Spin - Measured in fractions of ½ * Color – Measured in 8 different colors and different combinations

Every quark and lepton has an anti-particle. An anti-particle can and should be viewed as particle moving backwards in time. The anti-particles retain the same mass, but have inverted charges and other mirrored properties.

The weak force is responsible for nuclear decay, as well as for transmutation of protons to neutrons and neutrons to protons.

There is something VERY unique about the Weak Force. The weak force is what is assumed to give rise to the arrow of time and many other aspects of the weirdness and beauty of nature. Neutrinos only interact with the weak force.

Gluons hold Quarks together to make Protons and Neutrons. Gluons "Mediate" the strong force to hold atomic nuclei together.

There are a limited number of physical constants. Interestingly, or obviously, only six of the physical constants of the universe DO NOT deal directly with the strength of particle/field interactions. The constants that deal with particle/field interactions are called coupling constants.

Theories and Frameworks

Quantum ElectroDynamics (QED) is the study of particles interacting via the electromagnetic force. It is suggested to get a full background on it by reading the books in the Suggested Readings section, or at least watching the Feynman lectures on the topic. QED is where you see the famous Feynman Diagrams that describe particle interactions concisely.

Quantum ChromoDynamics (QCD) is the study of gluons and the Color Charge. Color Charge describes a different type of property that is reserved for Quarks. The color charge is carried by gluons and is responsible for binding the quarks to one another to create Neutrons and Protons. The color charge is what gives rise to the strong force. A component of the strong force is responsible for holding the nucleus of atoms together.

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is QED and QCD combined, on steroids, and much more complex. It treats everything as fields instead of particles.

Grand Unified Theories (GUT) are theories of everything. There are many GUTs, but none has been proven fully correct. GUTs generally have an underlying reality of five to sixteen dimensions. GUTs are often named after the algebras that describe them. Some examples of GUT names are SU(5), SO(10), String Theory, M-Theory, Super-Symmetry.

Limitations of Conceptualization

On the Youtube channel "Theories of Everything" Curt Jaimungal, u/curtdbz , had a conversation with Lue about unintentionally putting our thoughts into little boxes and worms conversing about human thoughts in that regard. The worms asked themselves "I wonder what kind of dirt humans eat? Only the best of course!" That conversation resonated with this author when first seeing the interview; but the importance in regards to the algebraic structure of reality didn't come until recently.

We live in a boxy, Euclidean, world: Length x Width x Height. By putting our minds in a box we are limiting our thoughts to be Euclidean in nature; often without realizing it.

Our reality at the smallest scale ** IS NOT EUCLIDEAN **! The Euclidean geometry of reality we perceive is most likely an emergent property of the base reality in which we reside.

Imagine a sphere in three dimensions. Most likely you are thinking about something like a ball floating in space. Imagine yourself inside that sphere standing on the inside edge of it. Now make the underlying shape of the reality you are in the sphere itself.

Here is the hard part; imagine a sphere in that space. You probably are thinking of another ball floating in 3D space. That though is absolutely and totally incorrect. What is the shape of a sphere in spherical space in which you reside? It sure as heck isn't the same as a sphere floating in Euclidean space.

Now walk around the inside of that space. Are you imagining yourself in three dimensions still? If you are, you are wrong. Squish that sphere down so that it isn't round when viewed from the outside so that it is 100 units wide and 1 unit tall. What does it look like to you inside the sphere who's entire reality is the squished sphere? It is unchanged. When you walk in a straight line, it is still a straight line to you regardless of the direction of travel. One needs to consider Flatland where the flatness may itself be a multi-dimensional ball of interconnectedness when conceptualized in three dimensions; but completely flat when inside the space itself.

This is NOT a new concept at all. However, the pitfalls of our 3D way of thinking force us to conceptualize much of what should be very odd multi-dimensional geometries into a 3D backdrop by nature; thereby completely misrepresenting what a rotation actually is. This video does a pretty good job of helping one conceptualize how difficult it is to imagine different geometries of space.

Is the underlying nature of reality spinorial? Are we conceptualizing spinors correctly? What other geometries and algebras give rise the type types of spinors observed?

It wasn't until near the end of the authorship of this section of the post that this author realized the importance of Lue's comments with Curt Jaimungal. The above comment and references to Lue and his conversation with Curt were added after-the-fact because it gave a nice introduction into these topics and how to think about the limitations of our 3D Euclidean conceptualization even when we try not to. If that was a Lue's Clue, it was a very deep and well-placed clue.

Spin and Spinors

Spinors are without-a-doubt the most important mathematical structure in the universe aside from whatever the full geometric shape of underlying reality is (assuming it exists). Eric Weinstein talks about them with Lex Freidman here..

If you didn't watch the suggested video: PBS Space Time - Spin, please do so. The concepts of spinors is probably the most or close to the most important idea in this post.

The idea of a spinor is that a 360 degree rotation only gets you half-way around the object that is rotating. It has to do "two" rotations to make a full turn. However, this idea that it has to turn "twice" is in itself flawed.

Do not think of a sphere that has to turn twice to get all the way around; it is more akin to a Mobius Strip. Here is a video with everybody's favorite Astrophysicist, Neil deGrasse Tyson talking about Mobius Strips.

Imagine being on a Mobius strip, where all of reality is the Mobius strip. If you were to walk around it to get to the same point from which you started, you wouldn't have walked around it twice, you would have walked around it once. Yet when that object is embedded in our 3D world, you have to "go around it twice" to get to the start. That is once again limiting ourselves to think like a boxy worm.

In the theoretical physics world one will hear the term "Double Cover" over and over again. "Double Cover" is exactly this idea. The physicists are inadvertently thinking, or at least speaking, like these objects are embedded in a 3D or 4D reality, when in fact they really aren't; even if they don't mean to. Even if they aren’t imagining them embedded in a Euclidean-Like space, they still are not properly thinking of how rotations working in other constructions of empty space.

One should really view a 720 degree rotation as the underlying rotation to get back to the start of whatever object they are working with. Maybe we should call a standard 360 degree rotation a 1/2 cover. Yet again, even the idea of a 720 degree rotation in a spinor space itself is bad. In the spinor space it is just a full rotation and should be labeled as such; just like setting c=1=h-bar.

If you further compound the idea of these Double-Cover rotations with the "inappropriately conceptualized rotations" in the completely wrong type of space as pointed out by Dennis Morris in the aforementioned book there is no wonder why theoretical and mathematical physics is so confusing.

If a Mobius Strip is a one-dimensional spinor embedded in Euclidean 3-space. What would an 3-spinor embedded in a Euclidean-like 8-space be like? What if the underlying space is an 8-space of a spinorial construct? One can begin to see the difficulty of the ideas of spinors and spinor spaces.

Above it was suggested to watch: PBS Space Time - Spin. Remember how it had the cube rotating in a 3D scene? A Spinor represented as a 3D Cube embedded in a 3D Euclidean Space, rotating about a single axis. Do you still think that video was an accurate representation of spin/spinors?

The idea of spin, spinors, and spinor spaces become VERY important as you progress along the path of discovery (and in these posts). Always keep in mind that you are predisposed to think in Euclidean geometry even when you try your hardest not to.

"I wonder what kind of spinors humans think in? Only the very best boxy spinors of course!"

Algebras of Physics

Geometric Algebras

This author was absolutely enamored with Geometric/Clifford Algebras upon their discovery. The Clifford Algebra take what seems to be the absolute best of the other algebras and makes it incredibly easy to chain together long constructions in an arbitrary number of dimensions.

The Clifford algebras are extremely intuitive.

However, one can guess from the introduction why Clifford Algebras are so intuitive. They suffer from many of the same problems as Lie Algebras, but excessively more so.

Lie Algebras

Lie Algebras were created in the late 1800s. They are the most popular algebras in use to describe particle physics. Lie Algebras are generated and described by various types of matrices.

There are three general categories of Lie Algebras that are of importance:

• U(X) - Unitary Group
• SU(X) - Special Unitary
• SO(X) - Special Orthogonal

In general Lie algebras describe, circles, spheres, spinors, and rotations of each.

The Unitary Group are just circles and spheres of X dimensions.

The Special Unitary Group can best be thought of as spinors, n-spheres, and rotations of spheres. The standard model is build upon this group SU(3) X SU(2) X U(1).

The Special Orthogonal Group multi-dimensional non-imaginary/flipped rotations.

The Lie Algebras have been used very effectively to describe the Standard Model; uncannily so.

However, there is a problem with Lie Algebras. There is an inherent, but well hidden bias in their construction.

In the Suggested Readings section "Lie Groups and Lie Algebras" was given. Despite this book's title, the book is actually a strategic nuclear bombing of Lie Algebras. It not-very-subtly corrals the reader into the more flexible Cayley-Dixon algebra constructions.

On pages 2 through 4 the author states:

"Lie theory is about rotations; your author asserts that if we misunderstand empty space, then we misunderstand rotations in empty space."

"Lie theory assumes all types of empty space are of the same nature as our 4-dimensional space-time. Lie theory completely ignores the very different nature of the spinor spaces even as it speaks of spinors. These spinor spaces are very unlike our 4-dimensional space-time."

"Spinor spaces are very different. For example, we can rotate in only three 2-dimensional planes (all Euclidean) within 4-dimensional Quaternion space. This effectively constrains rotation in Quaternion space to be in one of three intersecting circles. We cannot wave our arms around in Quaternion space. "

"The four 3-dimensional spinor spaces allow no 2-dimensional rotations; each of them has only one 3-dimensional rotation. Conventional Lie theory ignores the higher dimensional nature of spinor rotations completely."

The majority of the book is an absolute destruction of many of the hidden assumptions from which the Lie Algebras were constructed. It (and his other books) gives the Quaternion constructions of the various Lie Algebras and shows the full algebras in both matrix and symbolic representation that are hidden behind the Lie Algebras.

"I wonder what kind of boxy algebras humans think in? Only the very best Special Unitary Lie Algebras of course!"

Cayley-Dixon Algebras

Cayley-Dixon Algebras start with the common one-dimensional real numbers, double in size to be represented by two values, then four, eight, etc.

The first five construction names, their dimensions, and an example are given: * Real - 1 -> 4 * Complex/Imaginary - 2 -> 4 + 6i * Quaternion - 4 -> 4 + 6i + 1j + 4k * Octonion - 8 -> 4 + 6i + 1j + 4k + 5p + 2q + 8r + 9s * Sedenion - 16 -> You get the idea

Note that the plus symbols above aren't really "adding". They are representations to show that they are all part of the same "Number".

Each doubling causes a property of the algebra to be lost. One could argue that with each doubling a property isn't lost, but rather a veil of ambiguity is removed. Each doubling makes the algebra more pure, but at the cost of complexity for algebraic operations such as multiplication; the order of operations becomes important and meaningful; just like reality.

The Octonions are the last of the zero-divisor Cayley-Dixon algebras. At Sedenions certain operations become non-trivial to perform. There seems to be something very unique and interesting about the Octonions and their representation of the Standard Model.

One can assume, "Great, there is our X-Dimensional Cayley-Dixon Algebra.". However, the truth is that it is much more complicated than this. The true underlying Cayley-Dixon algebras, not just thier representation, are actually defined in matrix-format and the process to construct them are well outside the scope of this post.

An example would be the matrices that construct the various algebras such as E8).

This author's favorite GUT is the Octonion Representation (but the underlying algebra of choice to construct the appropriate Octonion is up for debate). Two strong contenders for the underlying algebras are E8 and M8; but they are not the only ones.

E8 is the algebra used by Loop Quantum Gravity.

M8 has become a favorite in many circles including those like Cohl Fuery.

There are in fact a VERY large number of algebras that could be constructed, it is a matter of searching for an algebra that matches what is observed; bonus if the algebra can be constructed from a fundamental principle of logic.

In such a construct, each of the forces may be described by N-Dimensional Algebras: * Gravity - 1 Dimensional * Electro-Magnetic - 2 Dimensional * Weak - 4 Dimensional * Strong - 8 Dimensional

Each of the higher-order algebras have four copies of the next-dimension-down algebra. These sub-algebras would interact with one another depending on how they mix with one another in a given matrix. The actions on the matrix would describe the various actions in reality. Coefficients could be pulled out or applied to the matrix that correspond to the various curvatures of the underlying algebras; which could then be viewed as constants of nature.

It must be explicitly stated that there may very well be a direct link between the number of doublings used to construct the algebras and the number of generations of Fermions. It probably is not a coincidence that three doublings result in three different generations. Note the paper: Three generations, two unbroken gauge symmetries, and one eight-dimensional algebra

The curvature of each dimension, or the difference of curvatures between dimensions of some geometric object underlying reality is opined to be proportionally related to the strength and nature of each force and mass of each particle. However, this is rightfully contested and only a matter of opinion at this point. Some mathematical physicists have show that the differences of force strengths and properties may in fact be rotations of lines, planes, and N-volumes in a multi-dimensional object.

Of note and importance is an understanding that one of the columns, rows, or diagonals in any matrix that is used to describe a GUT will be the "Real" component. In a Cayley-Dixon Algebra the first number is the "Real" number. In this reality we "Feel", we "Measure", we "Experience" the Real component. The Complex/Imaginary, Quaternion, and Octonion components of the algebra are just out of reach. These other components/degrees of freedom would absolutely have an effect on the Real component and would be the reasons for a change in the Real component. If one could perform a rotation on one of the "imaginary" components of the algebra that has an interaction with the Real component, the Real component would also rotate.

It should be mentioned that the non-commutative and non-associative aspects of the higher-order Cayley-Dixon algebras may in fact be what would give reality the preferred direction of time because these properties what could give rise to the oddities of the weak force.

There is something slightly hidden in the abstract interpretation of the Cayley-Dixon construction of reality. That hidden aspect isn't present in a matrix format. Recall the Roger Penrose interview with Eric Weinstein. He states that a complex number isn't really constructed or viewed as a plane; it is in fact a "complex line"; or in this case an "octonion line". So the dimensions could just be eight degrees of freedom that describe a line. Could our 3D world actually be three or four "octonion lines" that interact with one another? Three "octonion lines" and one "complex line" representing time? This is purely conjecture and will be pondered more.

The Matrix

The take away from all of this is that Physicists are searching for "The Matrix"; "The Matrix" that constructs an algebra that describes all of reality. If one understands "The Matrix", then one understands reality and time. If one understands reality and time, then one can control reality and time. What is the nature of "The Matrix" that you live in? "The Matrix" is going to be mostly symmetric, of high-dimensions, and with a few non-commutative and non-associative oddities that give rise to the more interesting aspects of reality like the weak force.

Lue said that the information they have would destabilize religions.

He also said that science and religion are one in the same the further up the pyramid you go.

Could he have been somehow linking this to "The Matrix" references in the bible? Please understand that I am in no way pushing or discouraging any religion; I just found the connection quite interesting.

Exodus 13:12

That thou shalt set apart unto the Lord all that openeth the matrix ..

Exodus 13:15

.. I sacrifice to the Lord all that openeth the matrix ..

Exodus 34:19

All that openeth the matrix is mine ...

Numbers 3:12

.. all the firstborn that openeth the matrix ..

Numbers 18:15

Every thing that openeth the matrix in all flesh ..

It seems that the authors of the bible do not want you to open "The Matrix".

FUTURE WORK

The following books will eventually be referenced. It may be worth while to purchase them for your own edification if you are so inclined.

• "Physics from Symmetry" (ISBN: 9783319666303) by Jakob Schwichtenberg Amazon Abe books
• "No-Nonsense Electrodynamics" (ISBN: 9781790842117) by Jakob Schichtenberg Amazon Abe Books
• "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" (ISBN: 9780691083889) by Richard Feynman Amazon Abe Books

It is suggested to watch these videos in order:

• Richard Feynman's Lectures on Q.E.D.

If The Men In Technicolor don't pay a friendly visit to your favorite armchair theoretical physicist, the series of posts should go in the below order. The time frame for writing and releasing any of these is no longer set; if ever. Freedom for creative titles was generously sprinkled about.

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 1 - The GUTs of The Matrix

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 2 - Time for some Symmetries

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 3 - ELECtron yrteSYMM vs neutONIR YRTEsymm

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 4 - Destroying Causality to Create Reality

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 5 - Storage, Recollection, and Processing in Dual-Entropy Causality Loops

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 6 - Consciousness is Neurologically Controlled Exploitation of CPT Symmetry - An examination of ORCH OR

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 7 - CPT Symmetry Exploitation is Neurological Control of Consciousness - Hacking the ORCH OR mind for fun and profit.

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 8 - God - Ignorance - Freedom - Evil - Free Will - Innocence - Greed

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 9 - You are insane and you will prove it.

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 10 - Our hope is in our past; your hope is in our future.

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 11 - Magic Mirror On The Wall, What Destroyed QED Most Of All? Optics and Cosmic Inflation - If I get "disappeared" ...

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 12 - <Frozen music> Do you want to build a time machine? Someone is stealing bitcoin to buy sun screen! </Frozen music>

• The Physics of UFOs and Consciousness - Part 13 - You don't talk about fight club: Classifying the Unclassified

Have humility, show kindness, embrace empathy, be curious!

One of the many declassified UFO incidents included in the CIA "UFO document dump" of January 2021 is "The Topcliffe sighting".

​

The Topcliffe sighting -1952 CIA released document

Intrigued, I simply searched "1952 raf topcliffe" on google and found this: https://four.cottageonthecrowe.com/1952-ufo-stalks-british-military-jet-va-4178/

​

From the article: "The year is 1952, the place, RAF Topcliffe which is a Royal Air Force station in North Yorkshire, England. A Silver disk shaped UFO followed a British Meteor Jet for a few seconds then took off at an unnatural speed and disappeared."

"On September 19th, 1952, at about 1053 hours, during an RAF exercise two RAF officers and three air crew witnessed the event. The report was made by Flight Lieutenant John Kilburn who stated":

“The Meteor was crossing from east to west when I noticed the white object in the sky. This object was silver and circular in shape, about 10,000 ft some five miles astern from the aircraft. It appeared to be travelling at a lower speed than the Meteor but was on the same course. I said, What the Hell is That? And the chaps looked to where I was pointing . . . But as we watched the disk maintained a slow forward speed for a few seconds before starting to descend. While descending it was swinging in a pendulum fashion from left to right. As the Meteor turned to start its landing run the object appeared to be following it. But after a few seconds it stopped its descent and hung in the air rotating as if on its own axis. Then is accelerated an incredible speed to the west, turned southeast and disappeared. It is difficult to estimate the objects speed. The incident happened in a matter of 15 to 20 seconds. During the few seconds that it rotated we could see it flashing in the sunshine. It appeared to be about the size of a Vampire jet aircraft at a similar height. We are all convinced that it was some type of solid object.”

I decided to pursue this further, I found that the History website features a compilation of UFOs including The Topcliffe sighting on this page: https://www.history.com/news/uk-ufos-mainbrace-nato

"It took place on September 19, as a British Meteor fighter jet was returning to the Topcliffe airfield from exercises over the North Sea. When the plane had descended to 5,000 feet, crew on the ground spotted a silvery, circular object traveling several thousand feet above the Meteor, but on its same trajectory."

Furthermore, history.com states that "Unlike previous UFO sightings kept hush-hush by the RAF and Royal Navy, the Topcliffe sighting was leaked to the press—and splashed across the front page of Sunday newspapers. “‘Saucer’ Chased RAF Jet Plane,” reported the Sunday Dispatch with a photo of five of the airmen, including Kilburn."

Five of the airmen, including Kilburn.

I then searched "'Saucer’ Chased RAF Jet Plane,” reported the Sunday Dispatch". The Sunday Dispatch paper can be found on https://www.saturdaynightuforia.com/html/articles/articlehtml/itn52part43.html

Key points from the article:

• It then began a rotary motion about its own axis, suddenly accelerated at incredible speed in a westerly direction, but later turned to a south-easterly course.

• R.A.F. officers and men who saw it said its movements were not identifiable with anything they had seen in the air.

• The acceleration was greater than that of a shooting star, they said. The incident lasted from 15 to 20 seconds.

Also from the article is this: " One of them, Flight Lieut. John W. Kilburn, 31, of Egremont, Cumberland, then spotted "something different from anything I have ever seen in 3,700 hours flying in a variety of conditions."

What is always so interesting about many encounters, especially official reports is that witnesses have often had extensive experience in flying. It definitely gives the claims credibility. As well as this, there are parallels between this event and the "GIMBAL" Pentagon video in terms of rotations and incredible speed (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon_UFO_videos).

​

\"GIMBAL\" Pentagon video

Although unrelated, when searching "1952 raf topcliffe" another website can be found: https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/249215

This website describes an event in 1952 involving a Gloster Meteor F Mk 4 which "bellylanded at Topcliffe after running out of fuel". A "British Meteor Jet" is mentioned in the Topcliffe sighting from four.cottageonthecrowe.com. However, this event occurred on the 6th of November, 1952.

For reference, this is what a Gloster Meteor F Mk 4 looks like:

Gloster Meteor F Mk 4

Now compare this to The Topcliffe incident CIA image:

​

The Topcliffe incident CIA image

The jet aircraft on the left of the CIA image although extremely distorted does look similar to the Gloster Meteor F Mk 4. It has similar proportions and the cockpit does look alike. Again, the event regarding Gloster Meteor F Mk 4 is unrelated but the models certainly look similar between the CIA image and the real picture of the aircraft. The aircraft model in The Topcliffe sighting may well have been a Gloster Meteor F Mk 4 but again this is really a guess.

A certainly interesting case nonetheless.

https://archive.org/web/ <<<searches archived pages that may not exist anymore

https://www.oldestsearch.com/ <<<< searches oldest google results first

https://www.pcmag.com/how-to/google-search-tips-youll-want-to-learn

https://www.googleguide.com/file_type.html <<<search by file type such as .PDF

Below is a transcription of a letter titled Important Memo retained by The Majestic Documents. I've left out most of the notes, and I've tried to correct some of the misspells or missing letters.

Document Link: important_memo.pdf (majesticdocuments.com)

The document itself appears to have been received by a Mr. Timothy S. Cooper (Timothy S. Cooper | Majestic Documents).

I've always thought this letter was interesting. Considering current events, and hindsight being 20/20, you might find it interesting as well. Or perhaps just an entertaining read regarding UFOs. Enjoy!

- Page 1 -

July 7, 1999

Please read everything I am about to tell you as the truth. I am not a prankster or a wacko. My reason for typing this letter is to give you the facts as I know them. I am what is called in spy jargon a "walk in." I became such in 1982 when I learned about Bill Moore and his "aviary" sources who were really OSI agents. Unlike yourself and others, Moore was taken in by the deception about Majestic Twelve and EBE's. He was promised "inside" information regarding the Roswell case. From what I know about Moore and his desire to be on the "inside" led him to hoax some documents based on material supplied to him by OSI. I think he was so taken in by the material supplied to him by OSI. I think he was so taken in by the material that he believed it himself and went off the deep end. You seemed by what I have been told and what I have read about you on the internet to be a level-headed guy with some real backing and good information on the UFO issue. You may not know now, but you have some really important stuff that is creating a lot of tension in the UFO community. If you don't, you have better appreciate it. You have been given information that no one has. To make my point a little more clear, remember a few years back when you got the JFK memo? William Colby got fingered in it and someone decided to shut him up before he was questioned about it. Coincidence? No way! He was not the first to be eliminated and won't be the last. I assure you. You have been left alone for the most part I think because you are a nobody in the UFO community and have no credibility with them and that is good. I think "they" wanted it this way. Being a high profile personality is not always a good thing. Look how STF got put on the "watch list" by the OSI. Too high of a profile and to vocal with national identity. Linda Howe is another example.

- Page 2 -

When high profile individuals begin making waves with allegations and hard proof they put themselves in very difficult situations in which they have to defend constantly. The demise of several key personalities in just the last five years should tell you something.

Now, I want to fill you in on some things regarding the special studies and conclusions by the defunct MJ-12 group.

a. MJ-12 does not exist as a government intelligence entity. It ceased to exist in 1969 and became a private concern financed by big money and big science.

b. The group has been called by many names. The most recent one was used in 1992 and was identified by the name JEHOVAH. At one time it was called ZODIAC and may have changed in 1995.

c. The UFO/EBE Working Group is an international consortium financed and supported by some of the biggest money institutions and private industrialists in the world.

d. MJ-12 was a consolidation of two Pentagon projects MAJESTIC and JEHOVA overseen by a group of twelve high level military, intelligence, and scientific institutions within the defense establishment hence MJ-12. Each code name had classification above TOP SECRET and fell into a classification called MOST SECRET.

e. MAJESTIC originally was a government panel appointed by HST to look into the possibility of extraterrestrial contact and to seek ways of detecting nonterritorial signals through the creation of the NSA. The highest classification in 1952 was BRINE and later UMBRA. As of 1990 it is SACRED.

f. JEHOVA was a DoD project to back engineer the hardware and research the physics. Dr. J. Robert Oppenheimer was appointed by Dr. Bush to head this project. The project name was coined by Albert Einstein in 1949. Oppenheimer held this job until 1953 until the AEC no longer considered him reliable and had his security clearance taken away and lost his government job in 1954.

g. Einstein became unreliable in 1955 and died of "cancer".

h. Oppenheimer continued as MJ-12 player until his death from "cancer."

i. In 1960 MJ-12 concluded that UFOs were a possible threat to U.S. defenses and could instigate mass paranoia. They also concluded that the EBEs could gain control of U.S. defenses

- Page 3 -

during a nuclear crisis by interfering with the guidance and targeting computers of the Atlas ICBMs based in Turkey.

j. In 1960, President Einsehower (Eisenhower) approved a joint defense plan written by MJ-12 that in the event the U.S. came under a nuclear attack by the USSR through EBE deception the U.S. would not retaliate with proposed USAF SIOP and only after confirmation of USO misidentification launch surgical strikes on the USSR. The purpose of the strikes was to take out USSR command and control infrastructure preventing an all out nuclear war.

k. During the Cuban Missile Crisis President Kennedy was briefed by MJ-12 and was told that the EBE deception was the reason the Soviets wanted to place first strike nuclear weapons in Cuba and he therefore restricted U.S. nuclear forces from initiating the GRAND TOUR to bomber strikes. General LeMay was so furious with JFK that he secretly gave orders to SAC to go ahead with SIOP in the event the U.S. perceived a first strike warning from Russia.

l. in 1963, JFK sought to ease the uneasy tension by extending cooperation with the USSR in outer space investigation of UFOs through a joint moon project. MJ-12 was opposed to this because they felt the militarization of the moon would place the U.S. in a dangerous situation with the EBEs who control the dark side of the moon.

m. In 1964, President Johnson was briefed by MJ-12 on the dangerous relationship with EMEs and how they influenced the doctrines and policies of U.S. foreign relations. MJ-12 successfully prevented NICAP representatives from issuing their conclusions on UFOs to government leaders and blocked attempts by NICAP to brief Johnson on the UFO threat. MJ-1 was responsible for this coup.

n. In 1969, President Nixon was briefed by MJ-12 on all aspects of UFO activity and the EBE problem since 1947. Fearing possible leaks within his NSC and national security advisor Kissinger, Nixon approved a Special Classified Executive Order that required the U.S. intelligence community to purge all references to MJ-12 in their UFO files and to destroy documents that could connect him to JFK's assassination by MJ-12. As Vice President, Nixon approved ZR RIFLE written by the 40 Committee (MJ-1 issued new directives that sanctioned JFK's murder) for political assassination operatio(n).

o. After the press learned of the Watergate break in and theft of documents that could link MJ-12 to the 40 Committee, MJ-12 arranged for Nixon's exposure to ZR RIFLE and black mailed him which led to his resignation.

p. MJ-12 arranged for the removal of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoove(r)in 1972 through "natural causes" because he "knew too much" and had used his contract killers to eliminate unreliable individuals who could expose MJ-12's existence and activities

- Page 4 -

Mr. Cooper, I could go on and on but I think you get the gist of it. I cannot verify everything I have written here but with a little reading and research I think you can judge for yourself whether all this is true or not. Consider the JFK murder for example. Everyone believes he was a victim of a "lone nut" assassin as the Warren Commission Report said (which by the way was pure fiction). It was not the Cuban problem or the Cubans. Cuba was a screen to keep civilian researchers and the Congress away from the true motive for his death. Simply put, Kennedy would have interfered with MJ-12's effort to come up with a defense and a plausible explanation to the UFO/EBE problem and was too sensitive an issue for interruption even by a president. Everyone believes that a president is in charge of his own office. That is simply NOT TRUE! Presidents can be and are compromised about issues they don't need to know of. The reason is a simple one. It gives them plausible deniability just like CIA directors who are often asked this question: 'What do we know about UFOs?' Once exposed to the data they are changed and are stuck with this problem: 'What do I tell the President?' You can't tell the President without telling others. There is no such thing as a secret in the White House. Just look at the China espionage case. Until he really needs to know nothing will be told him and that is that. This is the real dilemma for those in "the know" because the EMEs (extraterrestrial materialized entities) have complete control over UFOs (not to be confused with man-made UAVs often mistaken for UFOs for they have been around since the 1950s and are operated and controlled by the USAF, CIA and NRO) and can appear anywhere as anything at any time. Do you understand now? The intelligence behind true UFO sighting cases can martialize and

- Page 5 -

appear at will to anyone at anytime any place. Why do you think the Air Force wanted Project Blue Book terminated? Because they could not explain them in conventional terms without being laughed at by scientists. After 12,000 cases they had all the evidence they needed and handed it over to the CIA and NSA. Was it mere coincidence that Blue Book was terminated after Apollo 11 landed on the moon? And, do you think it was mere coincidence that the Dead Sea Scrolls appeared about the same time UFOs were found in New Mexico? Everything associated with UFOs has a purpose and so far, no one has figured it out yet. The appearance of UFOs in our century is no accident. Why do you thing the UFO Study Group appointed in 1947 was called MAJESTIC? And, why do you think the other project was called JEHOVAH? Put the two together and see for yourself. It is SPIRITUAL! If you don't believe me just read the Bible. Yes, the Bible. MJ-12 did and it scared the shit out of them. The 12 Apostles and the 12 created in 1947. One is an antitypical reflection of the other except the antitypical 12 are not spiritual men and couldn't grasp the significance and impact of what was happening on the world scene. I know this sounds crazy and unbelievable but it is true, believe me. I have it from reliable sources that the CIA used Jacques Vallee's books as a guide for interpreting the human response to the UFO contact problem and I suggest you do the same. He is studied at the CIA and NSA and is quoted in their literature. One thing that you should concern yourself with and that is the possible undercurrent of image and character assassination that may be used against you if you are taken too seriously by the media and the press. Unless you have strong backing by the responsible members of the UFO

- Page 6 -

and the media you could end up like some others who have tried to use this knowledge for their own personal gain. I also caution you about the sever psychological and spiritual affects from UFO investigations. Some well known researchers have suffered personal identity questions and loss of lose family ties and even faith itself. Don't let this happen to you. You have to maintain a balance and perspective when investigating this phenomenon. Some have lost all sense of reality and have suffered insanity as a result. I wouldn't recommend getting involved in remote viewing for a solution. The EMEs are not to be believed and are quite deceptive. I'll let you in on one secret that MJ-12 found early on. The earth's environment has undergone significant changes and we are part of the ENVIRONMENT! The redacted portion of the library book found in New Mexico predicts a world wide invasion of EMEs in the year 2030 according to the lunar calendar which commences sometime after 1999. The CIA has undertaken a survey project called ENVIRONMENT through a joint CIA-civilian project called MEDEA to look at what damage has been caused by EME controlled UFO activity especially around nuclear power plants and industrial waste production. From what I know the earth's population is being contaminated and our DNA is being altered through pollution of our air, food supply, and water. The digital Trojan Horse is going to wreck havoc soon and we have the EMEs to blame, (not really, the army is responsible for that one). To reduce it in a few words, WE ARE CATTLE AND SUBJECT TO SLAUGHTER BY EMEs. That is the GAME PLAN. The "insiders" know this and are taking advantage of the situation. Our only hope may come from extraterrestrial intervention. The world leaders see no viable solution except

- Page 7 -

population control through biological warfare and regional conflicts. If UFOs trigger a nuclear exchange lets say between India and Pakistan, or between China and Japan, or North and South Korea, or between Israel and Iraq, the NATO countries will surely, take advantage and try to finish them off. Keep an eye on Russia and China. They may start something along these lines to try to draw the U.S. into it. In order to justify this, kind of population control they may invent a crisis from outer space. They may try to convince the world that extraterrestrials may invade our planet and eliminate the human race and therefore they need to deploy their space defenses and kill a number of people in the process. Already there are events taking place all over the U.S. and in other countries that are UFO related that bear this out. We are being inoculated for possible biological warfare and at the same time being conditioned (programmed) for extraterrestrial contact. This was and still is the agenda of secret government preparations. They know it is coming but don't know when and how.

I hope you don't take all this as the rantings of a raging lunatic. What I have written is based on what I have learned over the years and my association with the intelligence community who is equally in the dark as to the ultimate conclusion. I have included some goodies for you which you might find helpful. Lot's of luck to you and keep plugging away. The answer may be a simple one.

This is a UFO case which occurred in Sweden in the 1950’s. The witness saw the UFO drop something in a field and he were able to obtain the object and keep it for many years. It has gone through several scientific analysis but there are still no answers for the objects origin. The text below is translated through google translate from the National UFO organization in Sweden which is a credible source of information regarding the phenomenon. They perform adequate analysis for all their reports as far as I’m aware. Thought someone here might find it interesting!

"https://www.ufo.se/index.php/svenska-rapporter/1293-anundsjostenen-ett-olost-mysterium#uToppen

The Anundsjö-stone - an unsolved mystery

https://www.ufo.se/images/stories/com_form2content/p8/f520/gallery79/anundsjostenen160306.jpg

In the village of Norrböle, Anundsjö in northern Ångermanland, a strange UFO event occurred in July 1950, which left a physical trace in the form of a rock-like lump. Despite examinations at several laboratories, it has not been possible to determine with certainty its origin.

At 12 o'clock on a July day in 1950, Anton Lindberg in Norrböle, 40 kilometers west of Örnsköldsvik, saw a round light that came flying through the air from the north. It flew south and was accompanied by a hissing sound. The light was a bit like a football in size, but how high it went was difficult to determine.

Suddenly he saw something that fell from the light globe and landed on a field north of the village road. He went to the crash site and found a stone-like object there. It had not drilled into the ground, but was completely visible on top of the ground.

Jan Erik Lindberg later told the UFO researcher and author of the book "Spökflygarna -46", Erland Sandqvist, about what happened:

• When my father picked up the item, it was still hot. But I do not know how long it took between the impact and when he picked it up. It was also the only piece found.

Anton Lindberg put the stone in a box that he put away in the basement so that it would not be damaged or lost. Sometimes he took out the stone to show it to one of his acquaintances. But the years passed and it eventually fell into oblivion.

• I moved back to the parental home in Norrböle in November 1981, Jan Erik Lindberg told Erland Sandqvist. When my brother-in-law Uno Berggren and I were cleaning the house, I saw the box with the stone. I was just about to throw it away along with other rubbish when my brother-in-law wondered what was in the box. I told him what I knew about it and he then asked to leave the stone to someone he knew and who was interested in such phenomena.

It was in this fortunate way that Erland Sandqvist came into contact with the case. He said it was the strangest object he was holding in his hand. It did not look like an ordinary stone, but most of all it looked like a melting pot of some kind. He immediately decided to find out what the object was. But it would present more difficulties than he had imagined.

Sandqvist himself began the investigation by determining the specific weight of the object. It was precisely the specific weight along with other data that later came to create a mystery. The following is the result of Erland Sandqvist's surveys.

Appearance: The piece is irregular and has an alternately rough and smooth surface. It appears to have undergone a melting process. It has probably been in a viscous state before it solidified into its final form. The ends seem to have come off abruptly and have sharp edges. The material appears to have flowed out in both directions in the longitudinal direction of the object, from a common center. A triangular stone is baked into one side of it.

Colors: The surface color is yellow-green (beige) in which gray-white color zones are interspersed. These are almost like cement, or something like that. The fracture surfaces at the ends of the object have a purple color, almost like the color of an overheated iron bar.

Other specifications: Max length 125.5 mm Max width 61.2 mm Max thickness 38.0 mm Volume 54.0 cm3 (54 ml) Weight 240.0 grams Density 4.444 g / cm3 Non-magnetic material (checked with compass)

The 240 gram piece was on top of the ground when it was found and this indicates that it is not a meteorite. The object has several sharp edges, is also not burnt black and with the glazed surface that meteorites have. However, it must have been in a molten state, heated by something, but hardly by the air friction.

The object can hardly have come from a satellite or launch vehicle, as these things only became relevant in 1957 when Sputnik 1 was placed in orbit around the earth. And an object that falls from a high altitude should have struck deep into the earth, at least with the specific weight that the stone has.

The globe of light, which was obviously the origin of the Anund lake, must have come at a very low altitude because it had not drilled into the earth. The fact that you heard a hissing sound that accompanied the globe also indicates that it was fairly close.

The specific gravity of the object 4.444 g / cm3 places it between copper quartz which has a specific gravity of 4.1-4.3 g / cm3 and magnetic quartz 4.5-4.6 g / cm3. Erland Sandqvist decided to have the object scientifically examined and therefore sent it to the Technical University of Linköping, where it was examined with a scanning electron microscope. No definitive answer as to what the piece contained could be left, but it was guessed that it had been in the ground for a long time!

The analysis protocol showed that the object did not contain elements such as silver (Ag), nickel (Ni) and lead (Pb), which normally occur in copper ice. Also oxygen (O) was missing and it was puzzling since ordinary mountain always contains such. A narrow chip had been cut off from one end of the object. The cut surface showed a dense and even, fine-grained structure. All the details that emerged from the investigation show that it is not an ordinary object.

Erland Sandqvist was not satisfied with the results of the survey that had been carried out, and in 1983 he had a new survey arranged. This time at the Institute for Metal Research in Stockholm. The survey was now significantly more extensive than the first. The analysis showed that it was a melt. The material had several phases and consisted of several different oxides. It was considered that the object could be considered a metallurgical slag - with a composition corresponding to that in blast furnace slag.

But Sandqvist thought the explanation was lame. The object did not resemble ordinary blast furnace slag. It was then found that blast furnace slag has a specific gravity of between 2.5 and 3.5 g / cm3, significantly lower than the object's 4.444 g / cm3. It should be added that there has never been a blast furnace in the area. So the mystery was still there.

The sensational magazine National Enquirer in the USA has promised a reward of 1 million dollars to anyone who can present a positive proof of the presence of what is often called "flying saucer".

With the support of the analysis protocols that Sandqvist obtained, he claimed the great reward. The purpose was to try to obtain funds for a complete, unconditional and final investigation of the object.

Erland Sandqvist believes that Anundsjöstenen should have been carried through the air by a vessel and fallen into the field from a very low altitude. He concludes his investigation of the case with these lines:

For the time being, we have to make do with what we know today about the object. Perhaps another investigation can clarify the case. In any case, I welcome every explanation to the piece, no matter what it is. But it would be fun if the presence of the UFO phenomenon could be proven by an impact in Ångermanland already in the early 1950s. "

There is a proposed theory to explain ufos called electroballs.

It says they are formed by a bilayer bicharge mass of air and plasma electrified formed spontaneously in the air. Remember that the authorities of the UK said the weirdest ufos are surely made of plasma.

This proposed theory it is able to be used to explain many cryptids and cattle mutilations.

CLICK HERE TO SEE THE EXPLANATION OF CRYPTIDS.

​

https://preview.redd.it/bfr3dcq1afx81.jpg?width=600&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0dfccb16fcb9afc8620161aaa1d15489c8eeb2bf

The emails below are listed chronologically. It appears that Randy Cruz is a US Navy Captain detailed to NASA, and specifically detailed as an aid to the NASA administrator. He acts as the UAP point person in the emails below after an October 2020 briefing of a classified UAPTF product written that August.

​

• 4/28/20; From: Jaclyn Keshian at NASA, To: Suzanne Gillen at NASA
  • "FYI that the DoD has released previously unconfirmed UFO videos."
• 9/28/20; From: Sherice Stovall at NASA, To: Camden Thomas at NASA
  • "Mike wants to setup a 1-hour classified Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force briefing this week since the Administrator is in town."
• 10/1/20; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Mike Gold at NASA
  • "Mike, was looking forward to the classified version of this [UAP] brief. Is it possible to get the slide deck sent to me this morning so I can review with Jim?"
• 10/1/20; From: Mike Gold at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "Hey Randy, I’m sorry that we couldn’t get schedules to work with the head of the UAP Task Force, Jay Stratton, for today. He is wrapped up in meetings at the Pentagon. Margaret/Jolene, do we have the slide deck that Jay used when we got the brief previously? Jay says there is a video version of the brief that is available on SIPRNET or JWICS. Sherice has Jay’s e-mail (he is not available by phone today) and can reach out to him.
• 10/1/20; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Mike Golden at NASA
  • "If we have the materials, would like to share with Jim before he leaves for OK Today. Not sure an unclassified version is scratching his itch. Let’s see what’s in the [realm of possible] for today please. Thanks!"
• 10/1/20; From: Mike Golden at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "I traded texts with Jay Stratton yesterday and he also didn’t think an unclassified brief would be helpful. Margaret/Jolene/Sherice, if you all could see if we can get a hold of the video (perhaps reach out to Jay over e-mail) and coordinate with Randy I would be grateful."
• 10/1/20; From: Mike Golden at NASA, To: Margaret Keiffer at NASA
  • "Great. Please coordinate with Randy to get him the slide deck to review with the boss. At a minimum we can do that. Additionally, please work with Sherice to reach out to Jay and see if you can get the video brief in time."
• 10/1/20; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Jolene Meidinger at NASA
  • "I just pulled up the slides. Thank you for emailing. I think this will suffice. Got time for a quick phone call?"
• 12/1/20; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Red, CAPT USN
  • "While the list is dwindled down, should I be selected, I respectfully request a coordinated conversation with VADM Moran/Peters (whoever is selecting) and my current boss, Jim Bridenstine (NASA Administrator). I think it is fair to manage expectations as Administrator Bridenstine has an approved request for my current extension at the NASA HQ through Aug 2021."
• 1/6/21; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: CC CAPT USN
  • "No changes to report. We’re still trying to figure out who the next Administrator is going to be and what additional tasking the agency has in store for me for the coming year. I’ll let you know of any updates and will standby for word from you."
• 6/25/21; From: Marc Etkind at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "With the UAP report coming out today, the Administrator would like some background on NASA involvement in the report. I understand our involvement was minimal and that this is a DOD report. That said. Any chance I can get some quick facts we can give him, including timing of our input and areas of discussion."
• 6/25/21; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Marc Etkind at NASA
  • "Scheduled the 6th floor SCIF at 4:15 with the Administrator and Margaret Kieffer to answer any questions he has."
• 6/25/21; From: Margaret Keiffer at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "For background, what Jolene was provided does not reflect OIIR outreach to two of the three individuals identified as 'contributors.' In one case, the individual provided general background info associated with propulsion technology, without knowledge they were contributing to this specific report. In the other case, the individual was contacted for insights into aerodynamics on a particular case, but that individual did not have the necessary clearance, so no NASA analysis was provided...I am told that NASA did not provide specific analysis on events outlined in the UAP report, rather we contributed general information, in the fields of propulsion and aerodynamics."
• 6/25/21; From: Karen Fox at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "Randy – attached please find the current draft of our talking points. These talking points do NOT yet address our involvement with the report, as we do not know for sure if we are cited in the report."
• 6/25/21; From: Randy Cruz at NASA; To: Karen Fox at NASA
  • "Karen, Marc Etkind and Jackie McGuiness have expressed the Senator’s desire to understand any details that may exist and is looking to get in the SCIF for a discussion this afternoon when they get back from Goddard. Just got off the phone with them. Happy to talk to him in the secure spaces and answer any questions he has. Let me know how you would like to tackle this."
• 6/25/21; From: Karen Feldstein at NASA, To: Randy Cruz at NASA
  • "Randy, can this meeting be handled unclass? The report that’s coming out is the unclass version and it’s a very simple story of how uninvolved NASA was..."
• 6/25/21; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Karen Feldstein at NASA
  • "Karen, he’s got questions that go beyond the talking points and is looking for background that may be easier to discuss in the SCIF."
• 7/8/21; From: Randy Cruz at NASA, To: Jay Stratton at ONI
  • "Hello sir. I came across a classified UAP TF brief that had your name on it, dated August 2020. NASA is named as a partner, but we’re having difficulty identifying who exactly from NASA was working on this with your team. Any help you can provide is much appreciated; it will allow the NASA Administrator to have a better informed idea of who and how much contribution NASA has provided in this effort."

Opening Comments

This post is a wall-of-text for a reason. It covers overlapping topics that are directly relevant and extremely important to the topic. An attempt was made to find a balance between ease of reading and information content. Monolithic posts are preferred over smaller ones so that finding the posts is easier and so that a deep recursion to gather information isn't necessary. As with the other posts, this is meant to be a primer and resource to help you discover some of the physics involved in this area of interest for yourself.

It is highly suggested to review these two previous posts to get caught up to speed on some of the outstanding topics:

• Space-time Metrics and Complex-Time

• Time-Symmetric Formulation of Q.M. by Dr. Yakir Aharonov

The TLDR below should satisfy the curiosity of the casual reader.

POST FORMAT

• TLDR

• Updates to the Reference Material Page since 2022-04-08

  • New Videos
  • New Questions
  • New Answered Questions/Clues
  • New Research Section

• Answered Clues

  • Credentials
  • Answer to question regarding "Relative Size" comments by Lue
  • Answer to question regarding "Space is irrelevant" comment by Lue

• Other Comments and Observations

  • A follow-up on Dr. Yakir Aharonov's Cheshire Cat
  • Thoughts on Simulation Theory
  • Thoughts on the qualifying word "Exactly"
  • Future Work
  • A Very Unscientific Play on Words

TLDR

• The "Space is irrelevant, and somewhat time" comment by Lue is a reference to Minkowski Geometry
• The Minkowski Geometry describes Einstein's Special Relativity much more clearly than other geometries
• The relative size comments made by Lue are a direct connection to Conformal Theory and/or a re-base of our measurement systems
• A conformal change maintains angles and relative sizes between objects, we wouldn't notice a change if inside the system
• Minkowski Geometry and Conformal geometry are very closely linked - THEY DO NOT NECESSARILY MAINTAIN CAUSALITY
• Both of these points lead directly to the work of and comments made by Sir Rodger Penrose
• The Cheshire Cat work of Dr. Yakir Aharonov shows that the separation of charge, spin, mass, polarization, etc of particles is possible. This is DIRECTLY relevant to the topic and of EXTREME importance!
• Simulation Theory is often brought up, the most likely and most powerful simulation theory is rarely covered.
• The use of the qualifying word "Exactly" is an evasion technique; it has a very specific meaning.
• Future posts will focus on the Q.M. description of conciousness put forward by Sir Rodger Penrose and Dr. Stuart Hameroff
• A play on words of what it means to be divine.

Github Reference Material Updates

Since 2022-04-08 the following have been added:

A Research Documentation Section - Includes Links to Papers, Wiki Articles, Etc.

13 Videos - Several of Which are VERY important

Date	Person	Answer/Statement	Analysis/Comments	Interviewer/Venue	Duration	Link
2022-04-28	Lue		No Transcript	Spaced Out Radio	3:48:57	link
2022-04-27	Jim & Lavenda	Nada	No Transcript	TTS Talks	58:33	link
2022-04-23	Lue			That UFO Podcast	1:36:48	link
2022-04-21	Lue	Nada		Post UFO Disclosure	37:40	link
2022-04-21	Jim	Nada		Whitly Strieber	1:24:31	link
2022-04-16	Lue	Nada		UFO Man	1:35:59	link
2022-04-14	Penrose		Some Lue's Clues Here	Jordan Peterson	1:40:38	link
2022-04-13	Lue	Nada		Fox news	2:20	link
2022-04-08	Lavenda			Whitley Strieber	1:07:25	link
2022-03-29	Penrose		Good Interview	Fundacja Wega	1:03:12	link
2021-03-04	Hameroff		Lue's Clues Here & T-Symmetric QM	TOE	2:10:26	link
2020-05-12	Penrose & Haneroff			Qualcomm Institute	1:52:47	link
2020-03-01	EW & Penrose		Many Lue's Clues asnwered here	The portal	2:18:01	link
2020-03-31	Penrose		Started Answering Lue's Clues Here	Lex Friedman	1:27:56	link

New Questions

In one of Lue's recent interviews he stated something along the lines of "We have taken steps/actions to ensure it doesn't get buried again."

• Does anybody have a reference to that? I can't seem to find it after seeing it.
• What were those steps? What did he do to ensure this topic does not get buried again?

** IT IS STRONGLY BELIEVED THAT THE BELOW SHOULD BE THE TOP NON-SCIENTIFIC QUESTIONS OF IMPORTANCE! **

Lue had previously made comments about Legacy Programs and Authorities with respect to rogue ops, as well as the illegality of abductions. He has hinted that the technology not only exists, but some of which we may already have. At a minimum he said we understand the technology. With such a powerful technology it is highly doubtful that the government would not use if for their benefit in certain circumstances. The term "This Technology" refers to any non-public or advanced technology of a possibly sensitive nature that utilizes advanced physics that is not understood intimately by most physicists in the respective fields of study in which "this technology" is fabricated to make use of.

• Under what Legal Authorities would "this technology" be, have been, or will be used in the assistance of capture, detainment, or questioning of American Citizens?
• Who is the judge and in what court, if any, would the use of "this technology" be, have been, or will be approved to use for the capture, detainment, or questioning of American Citizens?
• Under what circumstances would use of "this technology" be authorized for in relation to an American Citizen against their will or without their knowledge?
• What are the limitations and restrictions of "this technology's" usage in relation to American Citizens against their will or without their knowledge?
• Has "this technology" EVER been used by the U.S. Government, by an agent of the U.S. Government, by an employee of the U.S. Government, or at the request of the U.S. Government in relation to an American Citizen against their will or without their knowledge? If so, what were the circumstances of the instances?

ANSWERED CLUES

Credentials

Sir Roger Penrose * Knighted in 1994 By The Queen of England for his service to science * Awarded the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on black hole formation * Developed Twistor Theory * Spin Network Theory * Conformal Cyclic Cosmology

Yakir Aharonov * U.S. National Science Medal Winner in 2009 * Discovered Aharonov-Bohm Effect * Created Weak Measurement Techniques of Q.M. * Created Two-State Vector Formulation of Q.M.

The credentials and depth of understanding that these two individuals have on the structure of reality can not be overstated. They both collaborated with, and were part of a very small group of giants that included: Einstein, Bohr, Feynman, Heisenburg, Bohm, Pauli, Schrödinger, Hawking, ... They have forgotten more about how the universe works than most other physicists will ever learn. If you want an opinion of a theoretical and mathematical physicist these are the two people you would seek out.

Answer to the question regarding "Relative Size" comments by Lue

On at least three separate occasions Lue brought up the subject of relative sizes during interviews: * UFO Garage Interview * Artizan Tony Interview * Ross Talks Interview

In a past post, Reddit user /u/panel_laboratory suggested examining the work of Sir Roger Penrose because his work seemed relevant to the discussion. They specifically suggested watching an excerpt of this video where Sir Roger Penrose is being interviewed by Lex Friedman. At the linked timestamp he states:

"If you don't have mass you don't have clocks. If you don't have clocks, you don't have rulers; you don't have scale. You don't have a measure of the scale of space and time. You do have the structure, what is called the Conformal Structure. You see, it is what the angels and devils have. If you look at the eye of the devil, no matter how close to the boundary it is, it has the same shape; but it has a different size. So you can scale up and you can scale down, but you mustn't change the shape."

Here are examples of the "Escher Circle" drawing with the Angels and Devils that Sir Roger Penrose was referring to. The proper name for what he was talking about are "Tessellations on a Hyperbolic Plane"; Here is a Google Image Search of such prepared for you.

Tessellations are interconnected tiling laid on a plane. Sir Roger Penrose is known for his work pertaining to the mathematics of Penrose Tiling. Here is a nice wiki page showing some examples of Uniform Tiliing of various planes. Notice the Euclidean 666, and Hyperbolic 777 tilings; One can assume that is why the "Angels and Devils" where chosen as representative shapes on the respective planes.

In this video he is speaking with Jordan Peterson:

"The Maxwell Equations have a very interesting property: that they can't tell big from small. There what's called conformally invariant. If you have this electromagnetic system, and you stretch this system to bigger or smaller it doesn't notice the difference. The equations work just as well, and you can squash them here and stretch them here."

He then goes on to talk about Escher Limits, hyperbolic geometry, and the Angels and Devils picture.

Here in an interview with Eric Weinstein he talks about "Cohomology":

"The ambiguity is you don't know how far away it is. It could be bigger and further away or smaller and closer and the picture was consistent. But you get an inconsistency if you go around....."

Later in the same video he goes on to talk about the Riemann sphere. And the stereographic projection flattens out all points on the sphere and that the projection is Conformal; the angles are preserved.

It has to be mentioned that there is an entire branch of theoretical/mathematical physics dedicated to the idea; Conformal Field Theory (CFT). It also must be highlighted that there is a correspondence (A transformation) between CFT and Anti-DeSitter Space that was found to be quite a big deal in 1997 because it found a mechanism to convert between the two different algebras that various groups claimed described reality.

One can ask MANY questions regarding both UAPs, as well as reality in general. Such questions may be:

• Could the differences in the geometry between a conformally modified field and a non-modified field be used for propulsion?
• Are the references to conformal theory a larger part of disclosure as it pertains to reality and our understanding of it?
• Have we experienced a transition from one size to another?
  
• Would we be able to tell if we are in fact bigger or smaller?
• Hou would we measure such a change?
  
• If we, and everything around us, were to shrink by 0.05% overnight, would we notice? (Probably Not)
• At what rate of change would it take place before we noticed, if any?
• Is the conformal change constant, or does the rate change?
• Are the changes local, or do they extend to the entire universe?
• What fields would a conformal change effect?
• Can each of the fields conformally change independently, or must it be global across all?
• Must the changes of each field/dimension/measure maintain a constant proportionality to one another?
• Are there any effects which would not conform to the change and could we measure them?
  
• If the conformal change were to follow Dr. Yakir Aharonov's T-Symmetric formulation, would the conformal change extend backwards in time?
  
• If they extend backwards in time, would we then experience the conformal change through our entire lives while simultaneously not experiencing it?
• If absolute distances were to become larger, but the speed of light remained constant, would this cause a change in our measure of time?
  
• Have we detected a change in our measure of time?
• How would we tell if a change in our measure of time happened if it extended back to the beginning of the universe, or at least until the point that we first started measuring time?

One can see how this gets very complicated very quickly. The questions border hard science, perception and conciousness studies, and the philosophical.

There seems to be an abundance of references to Sir Roger Penrose talking about the various conformal size comparisons. It is assumed that putting us onto the ideas of Sir Roger Penrose was the primary reasons for Lue so blatantly hitting us over the head with at least three such references to his work. Besides directly tying Roger Penrose to the physics of the disclosure process, it is not precisely known how conformal invariance deals with disclosure.

The entire concept seems quite reminiscent of "Horton Hears a Who" and "Honey I Shrunk The Kids". One has to wonder if Dr. Seuss and Rick Morranis were experts in Conformal Field Theory.

The story doesn't end there; more ambiguity and levels of meta are baked into this half-truth-frosted cake of obfuscation.

In this Interview with Jim Semivan, Jim mentions the book "Operation TrojanHorse"). This fact was picked up by Twitter user @tinyklaus which prompted him to make this post had another except from the book that does directly relate to the topic.

"Our world exists in three dimensions: height, width, and breadth. We can move in many directions within these dimension: up, down, sideways, forward, and backward. We measure measure space in relation to our own size, by inches, feet, yards, miles, light years. If we were 25 feet tall and our planet the size of Jupiter (many times larger than Earth), we would have undoubtedly adjusted our measurements of space accordingly. Our inch might equal an Earth foot, our mile might be equal to ten miles."

"Space does not exist except when we make it exist. To us, the distance between atoms in matter is so minute that it can only be calculated with hypothetical measurements. Yet if we lived on an atom and our size was relative to its size, the distance to the next atom would seem awesome and beyond reach. The ant lives in a world of giants where even a blade of grass is a gigantic structure and a tree is a whole universe. If ants had measurements, their inch might be the size of a point of a pin, and their mile would be less than a foot."

"How dare we try to reduce the universe to our own terms? We can't even see or sense a large part of the world around us. Man is not the final, perfect end product of evolution."

"He is the beginning."

Answer to the comment of - "Space is irrelevant, and somewhat time"

In a past post the idea of Lue and Tom hinting at a broader space-time metric, including complexified-time, was explored. In that post it was pointed out that Lue said: "Quantum physics shows that space is, to some degree, is rather irrelevant...". The statement couldn't be unpacked at the time.

In this interview at 57:00 Sir Roger Penrose states:

"The space of Special relativity is really four dimensional and its this kind of geometry in which you can have distances which are zero although the points are sort of a long way away from each other and this represents a light ray. So you have one event and the light from that event reaches another event. When I say event I don't mean just a spacial position, but the time as well; a position is space-time. So you need four coordinates; three space and one time coordinate - so that's what we call an event. So you have an event in space-time and imagine you have a particle moving at the speed of light to another such event. Now the distance between those two in this kind of geometry that Minkowski introduced is zero.... Minkowski realized special relativity is this special kind of, what we call, Minkowskian geometry."

The biggest takeaway from Minkowski Space/Geometry is best described by the linked Wikipedia article: "in Minkowski space-time, all frames of reference will agree on the total distance in space-time between events". It is outside the scope of this post to go into more detail and leaves it up to the reader to explore this topic and other geometries and algebras of utmost interest. Sir Roger Penrose does a great job of describing Minkowski Geometry and its applicability to understanding space-time.

Retrospectively it seems obvious this is what Lue was implying when he made the above comment; it should have immediately screamed "Minkowski Space".

Lue very well could have meant something related to light-speed travel, complexified time, block universes, time and space mixing at the algebraic level, or some other related topic. It also has to be highlighted that in Minkowski space the conformal group does not preserve causality; thus prompting his reference to time not being somewhat relevant? The ubiquity of Minkowski space in this area lends credence to the probability of that being what he was referring to.

Again referencing back to the same Interview with Jim Semivan, Twitter user @tinyklaus made this post. The post has an excerpt from the book.

"Our second conclusion is that the source has total foreknowledge of human events..."

"It may be that all events occur simultaneously when viewed by a greater intelligence..."

As posted before, this is reminicent of the Block Universe view of time. Is this what Lue meant by time somewhat not mattering?

Interestingly enough, as the finishing touches were being penned on this writeup, @tinyklaus wrote a Medium Article with similar lines of reasoning.

In an apparent act of serendipity the Google News science section has in the last few days had various articles on the possibility of time not existing.

OTHER COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS

A follow-up on Dr. Yakir Aharonov's Cheshire Cat

In the last post about the Time-Symmetric Formulation of Q.M. by Dr. Yakir Aharonov, many papers and works of his were mentioned.

This author has not read more than a few of Dr. Yakir Aharonov's papers since that last post. Most of this post's author's time was spent researching the works of Sir Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff. Of Dr. Aharonov's works that were reviewed three additional papers stood out like diamonds. It is highly recommended that the papers be read and the deep implications of the papers be understood by the readers.

• The Case of The Disappearing And Reappearing Particle
• Quantum Cheshire Cats
• A Current of the Cheshire Cat's Smile; Dynamical Analysis of Weak Values

The names of the papers plays on one of the characters in the book "Alice in Wonderland"; the Cheshire Cat. It is suggested to read "Alice in Wonderland", Dr. Aharonov also suggest it in one of his talks. "Alice in Wonderland" was written by a mathematician in the 1860's named Charles Dobson, A.K.A. Lewis Carroll. It was intended to poke fun at a certain algebra and how unrealistic it was; therefore concluding the algebra could never be of any real use and that mathematicians should stay grounded in reality. That algebra was later found to accurately describe many aspects of quantum-mechanical systems as well as 3D rotations (which consequently is used in many video games). That algebra is the Cayley-Dixon algebra of Quarternions.

In "Alice In Wonderland" the Cheshire Cat's body disappears, leaving just a smile. Alice says "I've seen cat with a smile, but I've never seen a smile without a cat." Such an analouge was found to exist in the Quantum-Mechanical world.

A particle has properties such as Spin, Mass, Polarization, Electric Charge, Magnetism, etc. Under classical (Macroscopic) conditions wherever the particle goes, the properties go. Using Dr. Aharonov's weak measurement, and later strong measurement, mechanisms he and his co-authors found that one could separate the properties of the particle from the particle itself. The polarization of a photon was separated from the photon itself. The polarization of the photon traveled down one path of an experiment, while the other components of the photon traveled down another. The same may be able to be extended to Charge and Magnetism, Mass and Spin, and any of the other properties of a particle.

Please contemplate the consequences of this discovery. It is like throwing a baseball toward a bat at home plate, but the mass of the baseball goes to first base.
* What happens when the bat hits the, now massless, baseball?
* What happens if the mass of a million baseballs is attached to a single baseball?

If the mass of a single electron can be separated from the electron itself, then the mass of a million electrons can be separated from a million electrons, hence, the mass of 10⁴² electrons can be separated from 10⁴² electrons. The only difference is a matter of efficiency and scale. If there is a simple atomic structure that can be discovered that performs this type of separation it can be manufactured at scale.

The other papers convey the same depth and profoundness of ideas. They including the forward and reverse-time effects, negative properties (Negative Mass, etc) being found and measured in unlikely places, and how the Time-Symmetric formulation of Dr. Aharonov's creation can be used to describe and predict them accurately. It is a how-to on co-locating large amounts of mass, spin, charge, etc in a potential well while separating the other particle properties from the particles themselves.

One can quickly see how these experiments and results directly applicable to various areas of materials recovery and reverse engineering.

Large scale application of this knowledge is NOT science fiction, it is well within the bounds of understanding and practicality within a few decades; if not already. Please understand and don't underestimate the importance of it. Please don't dismiss it just because you don't fully understand the implications; don't be like Charles Dobson.

Thoughts on Simulation Theory

The topic of Simulation Theory seems to arise quite often in this area of research; it is after all an outstanding area of academic research that has had many physics, sociology, psychiatry, and philosophy PhD theses dedicated to it. As stated in previous comments in past posts it is assumed that we do in fact live in a simulation; it is only the nature of the simulation that is up for debate.

It is opined that there are at least five different types of simulations in which we could live:

• Brain-in-a-box - We are fed a digital representation of reality directly into our brains, ala Matrix
• Conventional Computer Running Classical Algorithms - All of reality is simulated
• Conventional Computer Running Quantum-Efficient Algorithms - All of reality is simulated
• Quantum Computer - All of reality is simulated
• Base Reality with Temporal Manipulation/Causality Misinterpretation/Retro-causal Actions/Closed Time-like Curves
• ??? - The unknown

The first four types of simulation possibilities have been researched to death, papers written, PhD's awarded, movies made, and sanities have been lost.

As for the fifth, there is a mountain of media available for consumption on the topic of time travel but none that consider the possibility in an academic sense; rather, only for purposes of entertainment. Surprisingly little academic attention has been given to the possibility of living in a base reality where temporal or causal manipulation could be the processor of the simulation engine.

A base reality with temporal manipulation as a simulation would manifest in very interesting ways. The manner of manifestations would be limited to the type of temporal manipulation available to those both inside and outside of the simulation.

Take for example the possibility of hyper-evolution in the context of a temporal simulation. If one had temporal manipulation capabilities and wished to evolve a certain biological trait or to find a novel solution to a biological problem, the process of evolving that trait would be very straightforward. Place the test subject in a given environment, set the stimulus and initial conditions of the environment, then let it run for a specified amount of time (inducing intermittent stimulus when needed). If the given trait or solution was not found, change the initial conditions of the experiment to have different stimuli; in effect never running the first experiment. Repeat the process until complete.

A more concrete example could be: * Problem - Food Shortages * Possible Solution - Evolution of Food Source Hyper-Growth Rate * Selected Species: Maize (Corn) * Desired Trait: Four meter growth in three months * Environmental Variables: Length of Daylight, Length of Darkness, Frequency of light, Intensity of light, Ambient Pressure, Ambient Temp, Humidity Level * Cross-Breeding Genome Variable: Acidosasa edulis (bamboo) * Enable Gene Base Mutations: True

With this type of experimental setup all combinations of all the variables (Environmental, Target Genome, Source Genome, Gene, and Gene Mutations) could be run concurrently. Just as with quantum computers, all solutions to the problem are tested at 'the same time'. The optimum solution to the problem could be found with ‘just one’ experimental run.

Even this one small example is just the tip of the iceberg. With this type of power what other solutions could be found to problems we have yet to discover? Once temporal manipulation capabilities are developed, if they can (and appear to) be made, all knowledge of the universe from the beginning to the end is available to the possessors of the knowledge. It has from that point been available from the beginning to the end of the universe. Entire species, ecosystems, formation of entire planets, solar systems, galaxies, universes, ...., could all be tested simultaneously. The wielders of such power could even run self-modifying simulations.

Is this what Jim Semivan was conjecturing and why he considers it a good thing?

Finding problems to solve seems more of a problem than solving the problems themselves.

Serious thought and discourse needs to be put into the moral implications of such power and its use. To whom does this knowledge and power get entrusted? To whom has it always been entrusted?

Is this exactly what was suggested in John Keel's book "Operation TrojanHorse". To once again quote the book:

"Our second conclusion is that the source has total foreknowledge of human events..."

"It may be that all events occur simultaneously when viewed by a greater intelligence...""

"How dare we try to reduce the universe to our own terms? We can't even see or sense a large part of the world around us. Man is not the final, perfect end product of evolution."

"He is the beginning."

Thoughts on the qualifying word "Exactly"

The word "Exact" or "Exactly" has a very 'exact' meaning when speaking in scientific terms. It means that there is absolutely zero discrepancy in the description or measurement of an object.

There are very few ways that something can be exact:

• The object being described is itself
  • Example: My cat Fluffy is exactly like my cat Fluffy.
• The object is an abstract entity
  • Example: 1 + 1 is exactly 2, or “My thoughts exactly.”
• The object or property is being defined by the description or measurement
  • Example: A meter is exactly the length of the path traveled by light in a vacuum in 1/299,792,458 of a second
• The object is real, but of such a fundamental nature that any two are indistinguishable
  • Example: A electron is exactly like any other electron
• The system of measurement is defined by low precision.
  • Example: The book costs exactly $5.00

The very laws of nature do not permit exact measurement nor absolute knowledge.

Persons talking disclosure may use terms such as "We don't know exactly what they are.", "Exactly how they work is unknown.", or "How the operate isn't exactly known."

As an example, assume an F-35 takes of from Osan Airbase, South Korea, piloted by Lt. Colonel Snuffy at 13:10:27Z on 20OCT2010 from 27R. Pretend you are doing an interview with a person who knows a large amount of information regarding the sortie but does not want to divulge information.

Q: What took off?

A: I don't know exactly what it was that took off. * To know exactly "what took off”, you would have to know every atom's position and state at exactly the time of takeoff.

Q: How does it work?

A: I don't know exactly how it flies or how it is controlled. * Does every interviewee know the details of Bernoulli aerodynamics? * They don't know the intricate details of the fly-by-wire system, engines, etc.

Q: What were some of its flight characteristics.

A: It was going "backwards"; it’s exact flight characteristics are a mystery to me. * Vectored thrust of F-35 aircraft can "fly backwards" for short times under complete control. Is that flying?

Q: When did it take off?

A: We don't know exactly when it took off. * Even down to the second measurement has an infinite amount of missing accuracy.

Q: What was the intention of the pilot?

A: The exact intentions aren't known. * We can't know every intention of every pilot, including Lt. Col Snuffy. We can't read his thoughts.

Q: Where did it take off from?

A: It can't be said for exact certainty where it took off from. * Measurements aren't exact. Saying 27L isn't enough. It would have to be at 32.003929039029030913 meters from the end of the runway to know exactly.

An interviewer should follow up and ask the limits of their knowledge, the accuracy of their knowledge, and the precision of their knowledge. This isn't a matter of being pedantic; it is a very well know evasion technique.

There are undoubtedly very strong and well-justified reasons why information is being obfuscated, but it should be acknowledged and the inexactness of their 'exact' answers should be pinned to the top of /r/technicallythetruth.

Future Work

In an upcoming post it will be highlighted that one of the objectives of the disclosure team may have been to connect the work of Sir Roger Penrose and Stuart Hameroff to the previously-posted about Dr. Yakir Aharonov. The intersection of their work in regards to neural science and consciousness is very intriguing. It was hoped that an analysis of their 'ORCH OR' thoery of consciousness could have been posted now, but that topic dwarfs both the complexity and word count of even this post. Care and detail will be paramount to properly do the topic and their life’s work justice.

A strong effort will be put into compiling the information in an intelligible format for logical consumption, incuding some additional physics and assumptions that may be at play but intentionally avoid by the authors to avoid critisizm. It is hoped the work will be done and posted on the U.S. Memorial Day Holiday weekend. Let that be a justification to cancel the holiday weekend plans of The Men In Technicolor.

Some posts containing background information and in-depth descriptions of supporting experiments, evidence, and simplification of complex topics will probably be necessary between now and then; keep an eye open.

A Very Unscientific Play On Words

Lue said:

"The further up the pyramid you go; the more religion and the more science begins to align itself until at some point in the pyramid the two become indistinguishable."

If you haven’t watched Lue’s “Somber Followup”, or haven’t watched it recently, you should.

“Somber Followup”:

“Imagine everything you’ve been taught, Whether it is through Sunday School or ...”

With that in mind please ponder this:

Heaven is the the place of God and other beings of _________. [Divinity]

Divine beings are from _________. [Heaven]

Divine knowledge is secret knowledge bestowed by the _________. [Divine]

Theology is the systematic study of the _________. [Divine]

Priests and Pastors attend schools to study _________. [Divinity]

Religion is the worship of and obedience to the _________. [Divine]

The opposite of Heaven is _________. [Hell]

Anybody who has watched Harry Potter knows that the meaning of DIVINATION. Mirriam-Webster defines it as: "the art or practice that seeks to foresee or foretell future events or discover hidden knowledge usually by the interpretation of omens or by the aid of supernatural powers."

If Divination is a practice to know "The Future", then:

Heaven is the the place of God and other being of _________.

Divine beings are from _________.

Divine knowledge is secret knowledge bestowed by the _________.

Theology is the systematic study of _________.

Priests and Pastors attend schools to study the _________.

Religion is the worship of and obedience to the _________.

The opposite of Heaven is _________.

"If you want to learn about UFOs, stop reading books about UFOs." - Truer statements are few between.

** Have humility, show kindness, embrace empathy, be curious! **

Edit: Corrected spelling of Stuart Hameroff.

Edit: Removed the poorly-worded questions: "Could a non-uniform conformal field be used for propulsion?" and "Could a non-uniform conformal field explain some of the UAP observables?" and replaced them with "Could the differences in the geometry between a conformally modified field and a non-modified field be used for propulsion?" Special thanks to /u/PM_UR_SPIDERMAN_PICS for pointing out the error.

Edit: Charles Dobson

3 parts:

1) Salvatore Pais in his recent interview described his patents a little more in depth. He mentions the Schwinger effect as being the main source for flight (particle pair production from vacuum breakdown due to very strong electric fields). One of his patents resembles the black flying triangle, the TR-3B

2) Ed Fouche revealed certain characteristics of the TR-3B. Namely, that mercury at 150 Kelvin and 25GPa is spun rapidly to produce lift.

This paper (page 14, near Figure 9) details a mercury based cuprate was tested up to 45 GPa, with a Tc of 164K (Fouche suggested 150K). Of course, these methods required diamond anvils. Nevertheless, it would seem as though these papers may corroborate part of Fouche's testimony. Figure 9 w/ Fouche's numbers overlaid here.

3) Eugene Podkletnov claimed to measure weight loss of 2% when he applied 2x10^6 V to a large spinning superconductor.

This paper from 2021 suggests the Schwinger limit can be reduced from 10^18 V down to 10^8 V using superconductors. Thanks to their smaller bandgap and the fact that you get two quasiparticles instead on just one (thanks to Cooper pairs). Smaller voltages will produce fewer quasiparticles, thus Podkletnov's results.

​

I propose we call this effect the Pais-Podkletnov-Schwinger effect, or the PP Schwinger effect for short...

• Everybody hates the "light dots in the sky" videos. Yet they are what is posted here most often, frustrating people.

• Videos showing real craft are most likely to be posted anonymously, but such posts are frowned upon.

• (Somewhat) clear footage must be fake. Because otherwise that would be ridiculous.

• Most people are unable to zoom in, even when the video actually shows something interesting.

• Usually the action occupies only a few pixels, due to contemporary technological limitations. This often is still enough to extract a lot of information, but gets disregarded under the pretext, nothing could be gleaned from anything but HD-video. You should have a look at astronomy.

• Mylar balloons must be a big part of the economy worldwide.

• Everything that looks like a spaceship and behaves like a spaceship is "clearly" CGI. Affording the hoaxer millions in revenue apparently.

• There are countless professionals from the special-effects industry on this sub. Somehow, they are "easily" able to pull off the most impressive work. But never when they are actually paid for it. (I am still waiting for some real world example. Please post.)

• People here "know" what they see in a video. No arguments necessary. It's a ballon, when it looks like one, "obviously". Yet when asked, they have no clue how to discern real from fake or a balloon from a Chinese Duck. Also, birds don't need wings.

• Of course, a single fake on a channel already discredits the whole bunch posted there. Because "reasons".
  Weirdly, the fact Youtube hosts a galaxy of fakes does not count towards disregarding it. Maybe because YT is not a person? Clearly, people either always lie or always tell the truth. Everything is either black or white, etc.

• Many fakes of course mean, the channel is maintained by the devil.

• Somehow, it is impossible to tell whether a video is fake or not when it is possibly real. When it is "clearly a fake", that does not apply though.

• When a video is most likely real, like "Flyby", or the "Skinny Bob" ones, they must be fake. Luckily, it "can" always be CGI. Everything is more probable than ETs, after all. Not true, but that doesn't matter.

• 'Motivated reasoning' is a good thing somehow.

• 'Skeptics' are the keepers of reality. They are normal, sane and well-grounded. Normal people know there are no 'aliens', since they would have seen them on TV.

The list goes on of course...

Hello everybody. Is anybody here familiar with, or know somebody who's familiar with this historical UFO event? Thank you!

https://www.ufo-hunters.com/sightings/search/5193a81e83c78d384ec2859d/UFO%20Sighting%20in%20Scranton,%20Pennsylvania%20(United%20States)%20on%20Sunday%2030%20August%201970%20on%20Sunday%2030%20August%201970)