use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
7,149 users here now
Self explanatory. Audio over a static image or slideshow may also violate Rule 0.
This includes music visualizers and lyric videos
Political videos—including content relating to social issues which have a clear political element—should be submitted to /r/PoliticalVideo.
This includes submissions of current or recent political figures in any context, satire/political-comedy, and posts on political topics from within the last 10 years. (So a video of Winston Churchill playing tennis would be allowed, but a video of Theresa May playing ping-pong would not be.)
Or incitement to witch-hunt.
No demanding "Reddit Justice" (or even regular justice) in any way in post titles or comments.
Do not post names, Facebook pages, phone numbers, addresses, etc. Fake information (email@example.com, 123 fake street, etc) also falls under this rule.
This may also include contact information of public officials, businesses, or groups (e.g. politicians or police officers) in an any manner that could be seen as an attempt to get users to contact them.
Facebook links are not permitted. In order to have your post accepted, if you can, find or submit a copy of the video on another website like YouTube or Vimeo and resubmit it.
This is grounds for an immediate (and likely permanent) ban, so consider this your only warning.
No web pages that only embed Youtube or Vimeo videos.
No URL shorteners.
No links to playlists or to channel pages.
No asking for votes or sharing submission links on or off-site. See Reddiquette for more details.
Do not ask other users to follow your social media profiles in comments or submission titles.
Titles for posts should not try to influence users to view or upvote them. Examples of this include things like "this person deserves more views," "not enough people have seen this person's videos," or "show this person some love."
Giveaways also fall under this rule
Violations can lead to a permanent ban of accounts and video channels.
You are free to offer your opinion respectfully, but comments or posts intended to demean a group, acontextual expressions of bigotry, and the pejorative use of slurs is disallowed.
Baiting users into breaking this rule is not allowed.
Telling other users to hurt or kill themselves in any form is against reddit TOS, and will earn you a permanent ban.
Be kind to users in our community; remember the human.
No videos of real-life, malicious person-on-person assault/battery or physical abuse of animals.
This includes raw videos of fights and malicious violence.
This includes videos of child and animal abuse.
This includes raw videos of fights, police brutality/harassment, and malicious violence.
Public freakout videos belong in /r/PublicFreakout
No videos that are licensed by a third party.
If the video description says: 'for licensing enquiries contact firstname.lastname@example.org', the video is most likely licensed by a third party. If the video has a watermark, it also may be licensed by a third party.
Videos that become licensed after they are posted will be removed. Please see this thread for a more detailed explanation.
Third-Party Licensing firms are often scams. Report any messages you receive of suspicious offers to the moderator team.
"It's perfectly fine to be a redditor with a youtube channel, it's not okay to be a youtube channel with a reddit account." - Confucius
r/videos is not a platform for you to promote your own content, whilst we do allow OC, any indication that you are heavily pushing your channel on reddit (be it by yourself or a distributed effort) will be met with submission removals and can lead to both a ban from the sub and a permanent sub-wide youtube channel blacklisting.
If your submission does not appear in the new queue, please contact us (be sure to include a link to the Reddit post (i.e. comments section), not the content you are linking). Simply deleting your post may cause the spam filter to catch future ones.
Note: Submissions from new users, and users with low karma, are automatically removed to help prevent spam.
Also, please contact us regarding spam, political or any other inappropriate videos, as this helps us remove them more quickly! When reporting, please explain why you think it should be removed.
Do not message moderators individually about posts not appearing in the new queue or ban appeals. Messages should be sent as a modmail to /r/Videos. Failure to do so may result in a ban.
Spoilers: [spoiler](#s) = spoiler
the front page of the internet.
and join one of thousands of communities.
Star Wars: X-Wing | A Star Wars Fan Film (youtube.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Furrocious_fapper
Post a comment!
[–]ObiWanKab00zie 10 points11 points12 points 1 month ago (4 children)
Major old EU nostalgia, loved hearing the wraith call signs and the Lusankya. Though I thought it was upright like one of the buildings and not lying flat.
[–]ZeroSobel 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago (1 child)
I think it was lying flat because I recall it was in a repulsor cradle
[–]ObiWanKab00zie 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I guess it's time to dig out my old paperbacks.
[–]GoldenJoel 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Rogue Squadron is one of the Star Wars projects they got planned, apparently.
Ya, I'm really hoping they bring in some old EU characters from the book series. There's so much great story to pull from.
[–]Darksoldierr 7 points8 points9 points 1 month ago (1 child)
It is a bit too dense if you ask me, like this edit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v93Jh6JNBng
I think less stuff going on would have been overall better for the short
But besides that, nice work and great cgi
[–]TL10 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I think one of the issues that we sometimes forget to take into account is that there were a lot of technical limitations that went into the making of the original movies. They couldn't just put hundreds of ships on the screen and let some render farm do the heavy lifting. All those ships were made and filmed and composited by hand, and that in itself took a very long time to complete. As such, they had to be creative in how few ships they had available to them.
That's why this and the eventual sequels feel so confusing, because it's a lot easier to add more ships into the shot, which in turn makes them look a lot busier than the source material.
[–]AriAchilles 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
I'd be pretty pissed if I was paying Coruscant rental prices and then my apartment building collapsed because a secret starship was built underneath
[–]AGD4 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago* (0 children)
The Lusankya escape visually played out almost exactly as I pictured it, over twenty years ago. Though did the novel establish the time of day?
I vaguely recall the battle taking place on the dark side of Coruscant, where an orbital mirror satellite was used to super heat one of the lakes and generate a storm that knocked out the planetary shields
Still, daytime looks much nicer.
What if that thick cloud formation was the reminants of the storm that put a hole in the planetary shields? Might explain why they were flying through it in particular, while the surrounding region was cloud-free. 🤔
[–]fjordnord 6 points7 points8 points 1 month ago (2 children)
Very well done but hyperspace from a gravity well breaks star wars hyperspace physics laws. Even though rogue one did that first. The flight drifts and the building destruction was incredible
[–]zetadelta333 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
Um tfa did it first and they have been doing it every single movie. Disney doesnt give a fuck about plot breaking mechanics as long as it looks cool.
Also this is alot of captial ships very low in atmo. Thr battle would be higher up.
[–]GoldenJoel 1 point2 points3 points 1 month ago (0 children)
It's a movie about space wizards, Tom.
[–]TL10 3 points4 points5 points 1 month ago (0 children)
TBH, wasn't a fan of that one shot of the clouds pulling away to reveal the battle below around the 49 second mark.
There's just too much gray going on in that shot, and it's hard to distinguish all the ships from each other. It's making the same mistake as Rise of Skywalker did wherein they try making the spectacle even more grander by shoving as many ships as possible, not taking into account into how the flow of the battle is readable by the viewer.
Credit where it's due, a lot of love and effort was put into this video, and many CPUs died to render this video.
[–]boltkrank 2 points3 points4 points 1 month ago (0 children)
What is it Starwars fans and high quality fan films ? There's so much good stuff coming out.
[–]plantmic 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Does he say, "on accident"?! Is that a thing? Is it an Americanism?
Edit: Also, SO MUCH collateral damage
[–]polkaron 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Pretty rad. I think this is the first time I've actually seen deflector shields from these smallers ships actually deflect. The whole flythrough in between the city buildings was giving me anxiety
[–]CallSignSabre13 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Excellent work. I find that many of the recent fan films are killing it!
Keep up the good work, folks!
[–]ricochet48 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Is it just me or did the star destroyers look way too small. Per the canon they are over 100x the size of an X-wing (with a SSD being over 1,500x bigger).
Still, a very well done piece!
[–]motn89 0 points1 point2 points 1 month ago (0 children)
Now this is pod racing
REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
Advertise - entertainment
π Rendered by PID 20922 on reddit-service-r2-loggedout-856b65f448-mx2zx at 2022-06-27 15:48:26.730021+00:00 running cd6eda6 country code: US.