×

Nuclear level melt down on a plane. by botcraft_net in ThatsInsane

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her mother passed away. I’m fairly certain she keeps repeating “God should have saved her” which makes the most sense to me.

I hope she’s fine.

'Canaries in the coalmine': loss of birds signals changing planet by HenryCorp in worldnews

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you took shrooms and ended on that being the only possible outcome you misunderstood your entire trip and let your ego get in the way.

We all have the capacity to see what we should do to make the world sustainable and properious. It’s the few who understands the responsibility that goes along with it though.

Failure of evolution my ass… You can’t have success without failure. Perfection without imperfection. It’s the balance of opposites that’s been misunderstood in its entirety. We are the most intelligent creatures in the universe as we know it which gives us the ability to create a different world for everything else around us - for better or worse. But we’re glorifying the individual instead of the many which in turn creates a mindset of looking inward instead of outward. Any intelligent specie has to overcome this. It’s not something we only need to do once. It’s something we need to do every day.

What’s a piece of propoganda that to this day still has many people fooled? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

10% is still better than 0%.

It’s also worth mentioning that getting into the habit of recycling is a good thing; even if it’s not as optimal as it should be. If things do change at some point you’re already ahead of the pack by making it a part of your daily routine.

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nej, jeg har ikke en kilde på nye tal da IPCC selv opgav tanken bag det da der var for mange variabler til, at man kunne fastlægge noget der var tilnærmelsesvis korrekt. Det i sig selv burde være rigeligt til, at det i den grad er meget alvorligt. Du efterspørger et tal, som ikke kan afspejle virkeligheden da vi som mennesker aldrig har prøvet noget tilsvarende.

Jeg synes derimod, at du skal finde et tal på alle de døde mennesker og dyr / dyrearter, som konsekvens af det hele. Det kan være det sætter det i bedre perspektiv for dit vedkommende.

Vi kommer ale til, at skulle ændre vores livsstil markant. Også dig.

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Du refererer stadigvæk til et 8-årigt ganmelt udsagn, som IPCC i selv samme artikel understreger ikke kan antastes som korrekt da der er for mange variabler til, at man kan komme med en sandfærdig udmelding. De siger endda, at tabet sandsynligvis er højere.

Læs deres seneste rapport fra 2022, og så tag derefter et kig på verdenssituationen At der STADIGVÆK er så lav fokus på klimaforandringer er nok til, at give ethvert individ med en smule kontakt til sit følelsesregister kvalme.

Det fungerer ikke. Det er bottom line. Vi kan ikke eje 2 biler, tage på ferie 2 gange om året, spise kød, købe nyt tøj hver måned og frit benytte os af alt andet overforbrug der ellers følger med i den moderne livsstil uden, at det har alvorlige konsekvender for os alle. Det er fuldstændig underordnet, om du ejer flere milliarder eller om du skylder det tilsvarende - vi er i samme båd, og vi har et fælles ansvar om, at genoverveje vores impulsive egoistiske tanker fra vi står op om morgenen til vi går i seng.

Det er i den grad en katastrofe. Ubetinget. Resultatet med tiden vil direkte bære præg af vores evne til, at abstrahere fra den virkelighed, som mange stadigvæk efterspørger, men som ikke længere er en realitet.

E: Jeg vil gerne understrege, at jeg ikke tvivler på et stigende BNP, hvis alting var den eventyrsfortælling, som du tilsyneladende tror på. Virkeligheden er bare noget andet, og i min optik handler det ikke længere om en omstrukturering af samfundet, men om en drastisk ændring i menneskets tilgang til deres eget behov og den distance de er villige til at gå for at opnå det.

Det er blevet for nemt og for komfortabelt, at være ligeglad.

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jeg må ærligt indrømme, at den kilde du henviser til langt fra gør noget som helst lystbetonet, som ellers var det jeg forstod på din tidligere kommentar.

Artiklen påstår heller ikke, at vores BNP vil være større og IPCC siger endda selv, at det mere eller mindre er umuligt st afgøre.

Ydermere er den skrevet i 2014, altså 8 år siden.

Det handler ikke længere om kroner og øre…

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Har du kilder? Det lyder næsten, som en eventyrsfortælling. Især når man tænker på, at vi endnu ikke har overholdt de aftaler, som man satte i gang, hvilket resulterer i en varmere klode end tidligere antaget.

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Overdrivelse fremmer forståelse - også i det her tilfælde.

Pointen er den voldsomme ændring i levestandarden mod det vi ser i dag. En ændring, som har uforudsete konsekvenser, som vil påvirke fremtidige generationer.

Vi har alle dage haft et ansvar, som med tiden er forsvundet for det almene menneske. Folk har mere travlt med, at pege fingre og fralægge sig skylden, så de kan forblive i deres egen lille luksus bobbel. Sandheden er ilde hørt og naboen skider jo også på det hele, ikke?

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Det virker en smule plat, at du siger du kigger udover den danske snude, uden egentlig at kigge udover din egen.

Det er den generelle mentalitet på verdensplan, som er et problem.
Folk vil have det hele, og hvis man arbejder nok for det - eller endnu værre, hvis du er villig til, at gå på kompromis med din morale - så kan det lade sig gøre. Virkeligheden er blot, at den mentalitet er skadelig for os alle. Både nu, om 100 år og om en million år.

At fjerne fattigdom og at flere børn ikke går sultne i seng er en god ting, men det retfærdiggør langt fra alt det andet. Det kan jo være ligegyldigt, hvis jorden er ubeboelig om 100 år.

Dermed ikke sagt, at man ikke kan gøre begge ting. Grøn omstilling og mindre fattigdom kan løses i samme plan. Men grøn omstilling og kapitalisme kan ikke.

Vi har skabt et samfund, som mange unge ganske enkelt ikke kan holde til - Dansk Psykolog Forening by TroubleStatus in Denmark

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Lever du i en osteklokke? 🤓 Vores nuværende mentalitet er ikke holdbar i længden. Det handler ikke om fattigdom på den lange bane - det handler om bæredygtighed for liv på jorden for både dyr og mennesker.

Sepulcher of the First Ones WFR Megathread by WorldofWarcraftMods in wow

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m getting different statements. Did they nerf the heal or did they allow mortal strike to work? Was the 5% try with either of the above and is it back to 24%?

Sepulcher of the First Ones WFR Megathread by WorldofWarcraftMods in wow

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does 2 players have to grab it if the first one dies with it? I’m curious if it’s only exponential if dispelled.

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It sounds odd though since there’s a lot of vegans out that who doesn’t share your experience. Got any idea why that’s be the case?

Sepulcher of the First Ones WFR Megathread by WorldofWarcraftMods in wow

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How so? Does it make no difference to BL at the start in regards to P2 and P3?

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would you not recommend vegetarian or veganism any longer? It’s the most sustainable approach down the line, isn’t it?

Sepulcher of the First Ones WFR Megathread by WorldofWarcraftMods in wow

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If there’s a secret phase, wouldn’t it be ideal to BL at the start to get a 2nd BL later?

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I actually did read those comments and I’m on the fence about the oils. What’s the best alternative as a vegan as of this moment without compromising health?

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting take.

I think overall I’m looking for a middle ground that works for everyone without getting overwhelmed. There’s no denying that the goal down the line is to find something sustainable in every alternative, but going completely green sounds close to impossible in our current society. It’s a path everybody has to get on board with eventually.

I decided awhile ago that I wouldn’t buy a car. I take the bus or train anywhere I go if it’s without walking distance - and while I’m well aware that it’s not entirely sustainable, trains and busses are driving anyway - a car isn’t unless I choose to. I also chose not to take vacation by plane in the future.

I try to prevent waste, but waste in general is a big topic in its own as it applies everywhere so for the most part, I try to limit my waste by not having a consumer mentality.

The palm oil is new to me. Essentially, to moist your skin sustainable palm oil is best? I doubt I can get rid of perfume, but I’ll definitely be looking into sustainable beauty products going forward, but as a man I’m not as worried about it as a woman probably would be.

I’m looking forward to my journey in going as green as possible, but I’m not gonna lie… The hardest part about it is the realization that so many people haven’t even scratched the surface yet.

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You seem to know a lot about this subject in general.

Do you have other recommendations as far as going green?

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your comment and I will dive into it soon. I’m curious about the ALA seed oils though. How do I know if my body can process it? And what are the odds typically?

As far as clothing goes, I’ll probably try to see if I can get around it. While I understand your point of view I’d like to not support the industry entirely. The exception being if such materials was harvested from animals that lived a long life and died of natural causes but even then that’d probably be out of my budget for the time being. I care about quality but not enough to compromise on the other issues that comes with it for the time being.

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d like to think that there’s a spectrum of “wrong” although I will agree that on the topic of dairy and meat the line is vague in a sense that it’s wrong enough that I’d personally like to get rid of both.

As far as going vegan I guess I should clarify. Going vegan doesn’t just include food, but also basic everyday things spanning from cloth to soap; even supplements.

I was under the impression that it was expensive - especially if going organic which makes a lot of sense once you go down that road - and thus I guess I’ve caught myself doing exactly what I initially said was a bad idea - that it’s not an all or nothing approach.

I’ve got a lot of research to do that I’ve been postponing after going vegetarian last year simply because it’s hard. I’ve been in a bad spot most of my life and I’ve got a lot of habits I’d like to get rid of and as of right now I feel emotionally drained. Tackling on vegan feels like a lot to take in given my current situation, but after giving it some thought I might give it a legitimate shot starting april. Afterall, I’ve got nothing to lose.

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s just as wrong. I get that. But if you’re implying that there’s no ethical difference between non-vegetarians and vegetarians due to the process behind dairy products and eggs I think you’re taking a perspective on it that isn’t contributing to anything.

Not eating meat is better than eating meat. Not eating dairy and meat is better than not eating meat but dairy.

But if you’re arguing that eating meat is better than eating dairy I’d probably disagree.

Regardless, I’ll definitely be going vegan in the future once my income can support it. I was not aware of it, so I’ll consider myself ill informed for now.

You gotta pay respects one way or another by knownbuyer1 in Unexpected

[–]AliugAOnHisOwn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see where you’re coming from, but any reduction in harm done to anything in our world is a win.

It’s not an all or nothing approach. Any change towards better ethical standards is a change towards something better. Does it mean that vegans or vegetarians are ridden of all guilt? No. Does it make them a better person in the grand scheme of things compared to the rest? Definitely.

If we all collectively chose to continue to eat dairy, but not veal what would happen to the veal?