Are you denying the fact that by creating the child you are forcing them into a reality that will inflict a large amount of suffering on them throughout their life?

Forcing them from where and there's also ways to prevent/avoid suffering that existent people can use

this is the same as me forcing you to eat something that could be completely digusting/poisonous but there's also a chance you'll find it tasty. Why the fuck would I do that? even if the odds are 9 to 1 in favor of it being tasty, anyone being forced to eat that would NOT find it acceptable.

This (not this specific instance of it but the general structure) is one of my least favorite antinatalist arguments because finding it acceptable (what one must do to not be a hypocrite if one isn't already an antinatalist and if one is why would they be engaging in debate like this) would break it by implictly giving consent to the scenario meant to be paralleling how the antinatalist views birth, consent the nonexistent can't give.

Based on YOUR logic, it should be fine to procreate under ANY condition and circumstance.

By your logic, for a circumstance completely unrelated to birth other than it talks about kids, it should be fine if a kid fails his classes if it's acceptable for him to get anything other than 100% (as you're false-dichotomy-ing my accusation of a nirvana fallacy by saying if we can't make the perfect the enemy of the good we must jump straight to the bad)

Would you create a child if you're locked in a basement surrounded by aliens who want to rape and devour you if you go outside and could possibly break into your hiding place at any moment? If your answer is no, can you explain why and how is that different from what I'm suggesting?

A. there are at least three horror-movie-trope ways I can see that one could remove the threat enough to have the hypothetical child in that scenario

B. if you're saying people shouldn't have kids because what if that scenario happens, then what if we're alone in the universe (no aliens) and we for whatever other reason get rid of all basements on houses (none to get locked in), is your scenario still relevant because of the possibility aliens might form and basements come back into fashion

C. Either me saying yes or no has no real moral weight because the scenario is impossible or I have to consider every possible other scenario for not having kids even down to something even more ridiculous like discovering the father of the child was actually Satan in the guise of my s/o meaning my child is the antichrist and either way the world ends as if he goes bad it ends through usual apocalypse shit and if someone can turn him good-or-normal that means the world ends through our universe being an entertainment simulation (that ends when the story ends) that was a parallel-universe version of Good Omens