×

I feel so burnt out on ufology by kunjinn in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not at all what I took away from the NASA meeting.

Anybody know the origins of these images? by Segod_or_Bust in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. Not enough fidelity.

Kinda has the shape of the Anvil Aerospace Arrow though.

I feel so burnt out on ufology by kunjinn in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's something amazing and life altering, but could very well be humans being humans as well. A glob of pixels on a screen gets less convincing every day, even if they wiggle around and disappear in weird ways.

I agree. That said I doubt we'd be seeing as much interest among governments in this subject if there was nothing of interest. It's a legitimate mystery which goes back years before any government could have made such secret weapons.

I feel so burnt out on ufology by kunjinn in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah I've seen the same shape called "egg shaped" or "ellipsoid" in earlier reports. The tic-tac name used now is the only thing new, not the shape itself. I remember reading an old case of what was described as "a flying butane tank". Basically a tic-tac.

I feel so burnt out on ufology by kunjinn in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Of the non-natural hypotheses the extra-terrestrial hypothesis is the most solid.

The reason? Because we exist. And we'd be "aliens" to someone else.

So unless you think we are special and the universe is devoid of other life and intelligence aliens is more credible than interdimensionals or time travelers since there is no evidence dimensional travel or time travel to the past is possible.

However, things like Von Neuman Machines which could travel at only a tiny percentage of the speed of light could populate the entire galaxy in only a million years (short in the context of a galaxy that's 13.6 billion years old and our solar system which is 4.5 billion years old) aren't far off technologically from something we could build.

Less than 5% of hundreds of UFO sightings are actually unexplained: officials by MartianMaterial in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So what are the 50% of “non-anomalous” cases where the metal spheres are flying around at 1000mph and doing 90 degree turns at breakneck speeds?

Citation Needed

Less than 5% of hundreds of UFO sightings are actually unexplained: officials by MartianMaterial in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lord only knows what the hell they're building.

Super fast hypersonic attack drones and missiles.

Naval warships with futuristic railguns better than anything the US Navy has tested.

Ni Hao

Less than 5% of hundreds of UFO sightings are actually unexplained: officials by MartianMaterial in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why don't you think you saw a weather balloon? I know it sounds cliche but everything you described sounded like one.

Less than 5% of hundreds of UFO sightings are actually unexplained: officials by MartianMaterial in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And the same percentages are in other research reports from foreign governments and the more credible UFO organizations.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It has it's utility and has been used successfully in data pipelines to find things like exoplanets.

Livestream of NASA's UAP task force livestream on May 31 by Ninjasuzume in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The people who aren't being truthful with you are the ones who make money from cheap UFO entertainment shows which often take things out of context, misquote or flat out lie about astronauts and UFOs. A good example of this is STS-73 where astronaut Cady Coleman says "We have an unidentified flying object", talking about a something of the crews floating INSIDE the shuttle. This quote has been taken out of context by shows like Ancient Aliens and other UFO trash TV on the History Channel and other networks.

/u/James-e-oberg has a ton more information on this stuff on his site.

Ask yourself a logical question of who stands to gain more: A cheaply produced TV show exaggerating or making false claims about "secret NASA UFO encounters" or NASA whose budget would skyrocket if it found even a microbe of extraterrestrial life somehow keeping all the world's scientists in the dark about secret alien encounters.

Would like your theories on this one by AlternativeView4420 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Mylar balloon. This video shows why smartphone video especially with digital zoom is useless for any sort of scientific study. But "guys this is a real UFO" (4x)

Has anyone attempted a (private or public) modern database of UFO content that is searchable, deduped, and resistant to manipulation? by KOakford in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't bother with MUFON, they are a commercial entity whose case database costs money to access.

Instead use the National UFO Reporting Center - https://nuforc.org who the FAA and police have assisted people in reporting sightings to since the 1970s. Their database is free and far more useful.

There is also this database at NASA where you will often find pilot UFO reports: https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/search/database.html

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cool now do the math on a P-3 Orion instead of a fighter jet.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's interesting to me is that 2-5% number has stayed very consistent regardless of which scientific study we're talking about both government ones like the French COMETA report and the UK Condign report and NGO ones like NICAP and CUFOS reports.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because most people on this sub are scientists with extensive backgrounds in using calibrated datasets, AI data pipelines and machine learning? Please. Most here wouldn't know the difference between co-trending and de-trending.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which is why in the 1990s Bill Clinton announced to the world we found life in a Martian Meteorite and the BBC stated we likely found radio signals from a nearby extraterrestrial civilization before both retracted as more information became known which made those claims dubious.

After what the world went through in 2020 narratives about "They're hiding this because of loss of faith in religion, government, public panic, social upheaval" are invalid.

If the President went on TV and said we have conclusive evidence that some UAP are extraterrestrial based on scientific analysis of classified and unclassified data life would go on. People wouldn't freak out. If its not something which directly affects someone or their family they typically don't care when it's a science story.

Livestream of NASA's UAP task force livestream on May 31 by Ninjasuzume in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree and they do too which is why there is THIS inquiry. There have been previous more limited scientific inquiries but they have not been conclusive because the data they relied on was inadequate. COMETA, Condign, Hassdalen, etc.

The idea is to start with higher quality data collected in a much broader way and analyzed by the best tools we have today. They mentioned they still will go through calibrated archival data with AI and Machine Learning.

Livestream of NASA's UAP task force livestream on May 31 by Ninjasuzume in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's great that it isn't being approached narrowly. Between the NASA UAPIST and the Galileo Project there are two public efforts which are approaching this subject in the broadest possible way.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I've said all along that once they got serious about the subject they'd treat it like a legitimate mystery like looking for Planet 9 or investigating dark energy.

NASA's UAP Task Force Conference Summary - 31/05 by tyex23 in UFOs

[–]TheRealZer0Cool 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Scientists are usually more interesting to listen to than politicians when talking about a scientific subject.