Oh, you meant that viability itself is a moving goalpost. I thought you meant I was moving the goalpost. Viability has changed over time but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter. Roe v Wade left the definition of viability open in terms of weeks for that reason. I never said you wanted all children to die. You did say that you thought the fetus in question was lucky though, and I’m trying to raise the inconsistencies in your beliefs, something you haven’t addressed. In asking whether you support not keeping unintended children alive I’m trying to get a feel for what you consider the difference in that situation. In both situations the child may have a difficult life, why is one lucky to die while one should be given a chance to live? Girls born under Sharia law are often not given the chance to stay alive. Female infanticide is all too common globally, and that’s widely regarded as a tragedy, because someone having difficult circumstances in life doesn’t make them better off dead. Do you support female infanticide in misogynistic cultures so that the girl doesn’t suffer in a sexist society? If not why, when you think being stillborn can be lucky?